Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Fourth Clinical College of Peking University, Beijing, China.
Orthop Surg. 2023 Jan;15(1):205-213. doi: 10.1111/os.13577. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
Revision of total hip arthroplasty for patients with severe acetabular bone defects is challenging. This study aims to report the minimum 2 years outcome of the iliac extended fixation technique in patients with Paprosky type III acetabular defects.
Fifty-seven revision total hip arthroplasty patients were retrospectively reviewed who underwent reconstruction with the concept of iliac extended fixation from 2014 to 2017 in our hospital. We proposed a new concept of "iliac extended fixation" in revision total hip arthroplasty as fixation extending superiorly 2 cm beyond the original acetabular rim with porous metal augments, which was further classified into intracavitary and extracavitary fixation. Patients were assessed using the Harris Hip Score and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index Score. Radiographs and patient-reported satisfaction were assessed.
At an average follow-up of 63 months (range 25-88 months), the postoperative Harris Hip Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores were significantly improved at the last follow-up (p < 0.001). The center of rotation was significantly improved (p < 0.05). Fifty-three (93.0%) patients were satisfied with the outcome. The extracavitary iliac extended fixation group had higher rate of osteointegration in zone 1A (the superior lateral zone) than the intracavitary iliac extended fixation group (82.3% vs 55.0%, p = 0.015), and significantly more horizontal screws fixation (5.1 ± 24.7° vs 42.3 ± 36.8°, p < 0.001).
Intracavitary and extracavitary iliac extended fixation with porous metal augments and cementless cups are effective in reconstructing severe superior acetabular bone defects. The difference in screw direction might reflect the different biomechanics of augment fixation.
对于髋臼骨严重缺损的全髋关节翻修手术具有挑战性。本研究旨在报告采用髂骨延长固定技术治疗 Paprosky Ⅲ型髋臼缺损患者的至少 2 年随访结果。
回顾性分析 2014 年至 2017 年我院采用髂骨延长固定理念行翻修全髋关节置换术的 57 例患者。我们在翻修全髋关节置换术中提出了“髂骨延长固定”的新概念,即用多孔金属补片将固定范围向上延伸超过原髋臼边缘 2cm,进一步分为腔内置和腔外固定。采用 Harris 髋关节评分和 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数评分评估患者,影像学和患者满意度评估。
平均随访 63 个月(25-88 个月),末次随访时术后 Harris 髋关节评分和 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数评分均显著改善(p<0.001),旋转中心明显改善(p<0.05)。53 例(93.0%)患者对结果满意。腔外髂骨延长固定组 1A 区(外侧上区)的骨整合率高于腔内髂骨延长固定组(82.3%比 55.0%,p=0.015),水平螺钉固定数量也明显更多(5.1°±24.7°比 42.3°±36.8°,p<0.001)。
多孔金属补片和非骨水泥髋臼杯的腔内和腔外髂骨延长固定对于重建严重的髋臼上骨缺损是有效的。螺钉方向的差异可能反映了补片固定的不同生物力学特性。