Ghalehnoei Hossein, Hormati Ahmad, Mohammad Alizadeh Amir Houshang, Ahmadpour Sajjad, Abedi Seyed Hassan
Department of Medical Biotechnology, Molecular, and Cell Biology Research Center, School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Diseases Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Caspian J Intern Med. 2022 Fall;13(4):728-734. doi: 10.22088/cjim.13.4.728.
Pancreatitis is one of the most crucial complications following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The purpose of the current study was to investigate patient-related post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) risk factors in two groups of patients: prophylactic pancreatic stent and rectal indomethacin.
Two different prophylactic modalities were planned and complications were assessed based on the defined inclusion criteria. In this study, the patients were evaluated for the procedure and patient-related risk factors in post-ERCP pancreatitis in the recipient groups of the prophylactic pancreatic stent and rectal indomethacin.
Pancreatitis was confirmed in 27 of all 170 selected patients after ERCP. By univariate analysis, two variables were significant with the development of PEP. Regarding the patient-related risk factors, unique subjects with common bile duct (CBD) dilated 10mm were more exposed to an increased chance of PEP (P=0. 015); meanwhile, other factors did not correlate with the increased possibility of PEP in both groups. The only procedure-related risk factor for PEP was the deep cannulation of the pancreatic duct in both groups during the procedure with an incremental significant incidence of pancreatitis (P=0.005). Comparison of prophylactic pancreatic stent and rectal indomethacin showed no effects in term of post ERCP pancreatitis reduction. Additionally, there was no significant difference between these two strategies in the rate of PEP.
Prophylactic pancreatic duct stents and administration of rectal indomethacin cannot have particular approaches for reducing the possible occurrence of PEP. The increase in time of deep cannulation and the presence of CBD dilation <10mm could be considered as important risk factors.
胰腺炎是内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)后最关键的并发症之一。本研究的目的是调查两组患者中与患者相关的ERCP术后胰腺炎(PEP)危险因素:预防性胰管支架置入和直肠给予吲哚美辛。
计划采用两种不同的预防方式,并根据既定的纳入标准评估并发症。在本研究中,对接受预防性胰管支架置入和直肠给予吲哚美辛的患者组进行了ERCP术后胰腺炎的手术及与患者相关的危险因素评估。
在所有170例选定的患者中,有27例在ERCP术后被确诊为胰腺炎。单因素分析显示,有两个变量与PEP的发生显著相关。关于与患者相关的危险因素,胆总管(CBD)扩张10mm的个体发生PEP的几率更高(P = 0.015);同时,两组中的其他因素与PEP发生可能性增加均无相关性。PEP唯一与手术相关的危险因素是两组在手术过程中胰管深插管,胰腺炎发生率显著增加(P = 0.005)。预防性胰管支架置入与直肠给予吲哚美辛的比较显示,在降低ERCP术后胰腺炎方面无效果。此外,这两种策略在PEP发生率上无显著差异。
预防性胰管支架置入和直肠给予吲哚美辛并不能特别有效地降低PEP的可能发生率。胰管深插管时间增加和CBD扩张<10mm可被视为重要危险因素。