Mao Fangxiang, Sun Yaoyao, Li Yang, Cui Naixue, Cao Fenglin
School of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
Peking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, Beijing 100191, China; NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing 100191, China.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2023 Feb;80:103321. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103321. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) delivered via the Internet become increasingly popular for improving maternal mental health, but the effectiveness of internet-delivered MBIs (iMBIs) is still unclear.
PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. We included studies that were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental study design, and pre-post test design and contained information on the population of interest (women during pregnancy or within one year after delivery), intervention contents (mindfulness components), and intervention delivery formats (internet-based). ROBINS-I and RoB 2 were used to rate the risk of bias in non-RCTs and RCTs, respectively.
Eleven studies composed of six RCTs and five non-RCTs were included. The overall risk of bias was high. IMBIs are effective in improving maternal depression and mindfulness and self-compassion. However, limited by the small number of studies included in the review, effect sizes of iMBIs cannot be estimated. Characteristics of iMBIs (delivery formats, duration, et al.) and studies (study design, measures et al.) were described.
iMBIs are still in the initial stage. Studies with rigorous study design and larger sample size, and determining the optimal delivery formats and duration and intensity of interventions are necessary.
通过互联网提供的基于正念的干预措施(MBIs)在改善孕产妇心理健康方面越来越受欢迎,但互联网提供的MBIs(iMBIs)的有效性仍不明确。
检索了PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase、Scopus、CINAHL和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCTs)、准实验研究设计和前后测试设计的研究,并包含了感兴趣人群(孕期或产后一年内的女性)、干预内容(正念成分)和干预实施形式(基于互联网)的信息。分别使用ROBINS-I和RoB 2对非RCTs和RCTs中的偏倚风险进行评分。
纳入了11项研究,其中包括6项RCTs和5项非RCTs。总体偏倚风险较高。iMBIs在改善孕产妇抑郁、正念和自我同情方面有效。然而,受纳入综述的研究数量较少的限制,无法估计iMBIs的效应大小。描述了iMBIs的特征(实施形式、持续时间等)和研究(研究设计、测量等)。
iMBIs仍处于初始阶段。有必要开展具有严格研究设计和更大样本量的研究,并确定最佳的实施形式、干预持续时间和强度。