• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1 级前列腺癌是否应重新归类为“非癌性”?病理学领域的观点。

Should grade group 1 prostate cancer be reclassified as "non-cancer"? A pathology community perspective.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.

Department of Pathology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2023 Feb;41(2):62-64. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.09.028. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.09.028
PMID:36428166
Abstract

Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of Grade Group 1 (GG 1) prostate cancer remains a significant health care problem despite of its improved risk assessment and uptake in conservative management. Removing the cancer label from these non-lethal cancers has been proposed as an expedient way to reduce potential physical, psychological and financial harm to patients. Such a nomenclatural change necessitates a multidisciplinary team effort by clinicians and pathologists. Genitourinary Pathology Society recently conducted a survey of its members, gauging their awareness of this controversy and their position on whether GG 1 prostate cancer should be reclassified. Most respondents (196, 81.7%) opposed removing the cancer label from GG 1 cancer, 33 (13.8%) supported a change in nomenclature, while 11 (4.6%) responded that they were uncertain. Of those who supported the reclassification, 17 (51.5%) supported the change for radical prostatectomy only, 4 (12.1%) for biopsy only, and 12 (36.4%) for both biopsy and radical prostatectomy. This survey results highlight the gap between pathologists and clinicians in whether GG 1 prostate cancer should be labeled as "non-cancer," and calls for continued debates and conversations between pathologists and clinicians, and further studies on the biology, diagnostic reproducibility, and ideal management of GG 1 prostate cancer in order to make a more evidence-based decision for patients.

摘要

尽管对 GG1 前列腺癌的风险评估有所改善,并采用了更保守的管理方法,但这种癌症的过度诊断和过度治疗仍然是一个严重的医疗保健问题。有人提议,将这些非致命性癌症从癌症标签中去除,以减少对患者身体、心理和经济方面的潜在伤害。这种命名上的改变需要临床医生和病理学家的多学科团队努力。泌尿生殖系统病理学学会最近对其成员进行了一项调查,了解他们对这一争议的认识,以及他们对 GG1 前列腺癌是否应重新分类的立场。大多数受访者(196 人,占 81.7%)反对从 GG1 癌症中去除癌症标签,33 人(占 13.8%)支持改变命名,11 人(占 4.6%)表示不确定。在支持重新分类的人中,17 人(占 51.5%)仅支持对根治性前列腺切除术进行分类,4 人(占 12.1%)仅支持对活检进行分类,12 人(占 36.4%)支持对活检和根治性前列腺切除术都进行分类。这项调查结果突出了病理学家和临床医生之间在 GG1 前列腺癌是否应被标记为“非癌性”的问题上存在分歧,并呼吁病理学家和临床医生之间继续进行辩论和对话,进一步研究 GG1 前列腺癌的生物学、诊断可重复性以及理想的管理方法,以便为患者做出更基于证据的决策。

相似文献

1
Should grade group 1 prostate cancer be reclassified as "non-cancer"? A pathology community perspective.1 级前列腺癌是否应重新归类为“非癌性”?病理学领域的观点。
Urol Oncol. 2023 Feb;41(2):62-64. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.09.028. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
2
MRI-Targeted, Systematic, and Combined Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.MRI 靶向、系统和联合活检在前列腺癌诊断中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):917-928. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910038.
3
Renaming Grade Group 1 Prostate "Cancer" From a Pathology Perspective: A Call for Multidisciplinary Discussion.从病理学角度重新命名1级前列腺“癌”:呼吁进行多学科讨论。
Adv Anat Pathol. 2023 Sep 1;30(5):293-300. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000400. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
4
Bioptic intraprostatic chronic inflammation predicts adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in patients with low-grade prostate cancer.活检前列腺内慢性炎症预示着低级别前列腺癌患者根治性前列腺切除术后不良病理。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Oct;38(10):793.e19-793.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.02.025. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
5
Older Age Predicts Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Grade Reclassification to Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Men on Active Surveillance.年龄较大预测主动监测男性活检和根治性前列腺切除术分级向侵袭性前列腺癌的重新分类。
J Urol. 2019 Jan;201(1):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.023.
6
Diagnostic significance of reassessment of prostate biopsy specimens by experienced urological pathologists at a high-volume institution.高容量机构中经验丰富的泌尿科病理学家重新评估前列腺活检标本的诊断意义。
Virchows Arch. 2022 May;480(5):979-987. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03272-0. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
7
Biopsy Core Features are Poor Predictors of Adverse Pathology in Men with Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer.活检核心特征是预测低级别前列腺癌患者不良病理的不良指标。
J Urol. 2018 Apr;199(4):961-968. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
8
Prostate cancer grade migration and facility-level treatment trends for grade group 1 disease.前列腺癌分级迁移与分级分组 1 疾病的医疗机构治疗趋势。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Mar 1;7(2). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad018.
9
Added Value of Concomitant Systematic and Fusion Targeted Biopsies for Grade Group Prediction Based on Radical Prostatectomy Final Pathology on Positive Magnetic Resonance Imaging.基于阳性磁共振成像的根治性前列腺切除术最终病理的系统和融合靶向活检对分级分组预测的附加价值。
J Urol. 2019 Dec;202(6):1182-1187. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000418. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
Trends in disagreement with outside genitourinary pathology diagnoses at an academic center.学术中心中外泌生殖器病理学诊断不一致的趋势。
Pathol Res Pract. 2022 Aug;236:153997. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2022.153997. Epub 2022 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of the diagnostic label for a low-risk prostate lesion: protocol for two online factorial randomised experiments.低危前列腺病变诊断标签的影响:两项在线析因随机对照实验方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 9;14(8):e085947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085947.
2
Putting patients first to redefine prostate cancer classifications.将患者放在首位以重新定义前列腺癌分类。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Nov 8;115(11):1249-1251. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad124.