Núcleo de Investigación en Salud, Actividad Física y Deporte ISAFYD, Universidad de Las Américas, Viña del Mar 2531098, Chile.
Facultad de Ciencias, Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Magíster en Nutrición para la Actividad Física y el Deporte, Universidad Mayor, Santiago 8580745, Chile.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 16;19(22):15063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215063.
The objectives of this study were: (a) to determine asymmetries, both lower limb (LL) and upper limb (UL), in Chilean older adults, and (b) to relate asymmetries to FA in both LL and UL. Forty-one older adults voluntarily participated in this study (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: age 72.0 ± 8.0 years, LL asymmetries 13.78 ± 14.87%, UL asymmetries 10.70 ± 8.85%, FA 40.35 ± 16.26 points). The variables were: (1) asymmetries of LL and UL, assessed through a force platform and handgrip, respectively; (2) FA, assessed through the Latin American Group for Maturity (GDLAM) and the GDLAM index of autonomy (GI) protocol. The relationship between the variables was performed through Spearman's correlation. The analysis showed that 39% of the participants presented asymmetries above 15% in the LL. Likewise, this 39% of older adults presented a lower FA than their peers with asymmetries below 15% in the LL (≤15%: 35.64 ± 12.26 points vs. >15%: 47.69 ± 19.23 points, = 0.003). The analysis showed a small correlation between LL and GI asymmetries ( = 0.27, = 0.07) and a small but negative correlation between UL and GI ( = -0.21). The mean values of asymmetries of both LL and UL are within 'normal' parameters. However, several older adults were identified as being at risk. In parallel, older adults who presented a higher level of asymmetries in LL showed a lower level of FA.
(a)确定智利老年人下肢(LL)和上肢(UL)的不对称性;(b)将不对称性与 LL 和 UL 的 FA 相关联。41 名老年人自愿参加了这项研究(平均年龄±标准差[SD]:72.0±8.0 岁,LL 不对称性 13.78±14.87%,UL 不对称性 10.70±8.85%,FA 40.35±16.26 分)。变量为:(1)通过力平台和握力分别评估 LL 和 UL 的不对称性;(2)通过拉丁美洲成熟组(GDLAM)和 GDLAM 自主指数(GI)协议评估 FA。通过 Spearman 相关分析研究变量之间的关系。分析表明,39%的参与者的 LL 出现了超过 15%的不对称性。同样,这 39%的老年人的 FA 低于 LL 不对称性低于 15%的同龄人(≤15%:35.64±12.26 分;>15%:47.69±19.23 分,=0.003)。分析表明,LL 和 GI 不对称性之间存在小的相关性(=0.27,=0.07),UL 和 GI 之间存在小但负相关(=−0.21)。LL 和 UL 的不对称性平均值在“正常”范围内。然而,有几个老年人被认为存在风险。同时,LL 出现较高不对称性的老年人 FA 水平较低。