Department of Psychiatry & Laboratory of Psychiatric Research (ULB 266), Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Psychology & Laboratory of Psychiatric Research (ULB 266), Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 18;19(22):15264. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215264.
Alexithymia and anhedonia are associated with psychiatric disorders, such as depression and anxiety. The COVID-19 pandemic lead to a significant deterioration in the mental health of the population. It is therefore important to examine the effects of lockdown on alexithymia and anhedonia and their relationships with anxiety and depression. We compared the scores and characteristics of 286 patients divided into two groups: one before lockdown (group 1, = 127), the other during the progressive lockdown release (group 2, = 159). The groups were homogeneous in terms of age, sex ratio, socio-professional categories, and somatic and psychiatric comorbidities. The groups were compared on the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) measuring alexithymia, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) measuring depression, the anhedonia subscale of the BDI-II measuring state-anhedonia and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) measuring state and trait anxiety. The ratio of alexithymic subjects in group 1 is 22.83% to 33.33% in group 2 (-value = 0.034). This suggests a significant increase in the number of alexithymic patients after lockdown. We did not observe any difference in the proportion of depressed and anxious subjects before or after lockdown. Among the different scales, higher scores were only found on the cognitive factor of alexithymia on group 2 comparatively to group 1. This study indicates an increase in the proportion of alexithymic subjects following lockdown. Unexpectedly, this was unrelated to depression, anxiety or anhedonia levels, which remained stable. Further studies are needed to confirm this result and to evaluate precisely which factors related to the lockdown context are responsible for such an increase.
述情障碍和快感缺失与精神障碍有关,如抑郁和焦虑。COVID-19 大流行导致人们的心理健康显著恶化。因此,检查封锁对述情障碍和快感缺失的影响及其与焦虑和抑郁的关系非常重要。我们比较了 286 名患者分为两组的评分和特征:一组在封锁前(第 1 组,n=127),另一组在逐步解除封锁期间(第 2 组,n=159)。两组在年龄、性别比例、社会职业类别以及躯体和精神共病方面具有同质性。两组在多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS-20)测量述情障碍、贝克抑郁量表(BDI-II)测量抑郁、BDI-II 的快感缺失子量表测量状态快感缺失和状态特质焦虑量表(STAI)测量状态和特质焦虑方面进行了比较。第 1 组的述情障碍患者比例为 22.83%至 33.33%,第 2 组为 33.33%(x2 值=0.034)。这表明封锁后述情障碍患者的数量显著增加。我们没有观察到封锁前后抑郁和焦虑患者比例的差异。在不同的量表中,只有第 2 组的述情障碍认知因子的评分高于第 1 组。这项研究表明封锁后述情障碍患者的比例增加。出乎意料的是,这与抑郁、焦虑或快感缺失水平无关,这些水平保持稳定。需要进一步的研究来证实这一结果,并准确评估与封锁背景相关的哪些因素导致了这种增加。