• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善瑞士农村地区慢性脊髓损伤患者服务中专科医生与全科医生之间的协作:SCI-Co研究的基线结果

Improving collaboration between specialists and general practitioners in services for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury living in rural areas of Switzerland: Baseline results from the SCI-Co study.

作者信息

Tomaschek Rebecca, Gemperli Armin, Essig Stefan

机构信息

Center for Primary and Community Care, Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 May;47(3):423-431. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2097996. Epub 2022 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1080/10790268.2022.2097996
PMID:36441044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11044760/
Abstract

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: Strategies to combine primary and specialized care are crucial to meet the needs of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) located in rural areas. We explored the collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and SCI specialists who will participate in an intervention study to improve their collaboration.

DESIGN

A questionnaire survey from August to October 2020.

SETTING

Primary Care, Specialized SCI care.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight GPs and 13 SCI specialists.

INTERVENTIONS

Baseline results from the SCI-Co study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

N/A.

RESULTS

Overall, satisfaction ratings for the collaboration between GPs and SCI specialists were high, and all physicians agreed that they work together well. Especially, SCI specialists were satisfied in collaborating with GPs. Despite Switzerland's fragmented primary and secondary care system, only a few physicians reported about issues with delays and waiting lists. While GPs wanted to improve the quality of their referral, most SCI specialists reported being content with it. GPs were also discontent about discharge organization by specialists.

CONCLUSION

Satisfaction with collaboration was high, both in GPs and specialists. Areas for improvement include discharge and referral processes.

摘要

背景/目的:整合初级保健和专科护理的策略对于满足农村地区脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的需求至关重要。我们探讨了全科医生(GPs)与SCI专科医生之间的合作情况,这些医生将参与一项干预研究以改善他们之间的合作。

设计

2020年8月至10月进行问卷调查。

地点

初级保健、专科SCI护理。

参与者

8名全科医生和13名SCI专科医生。

干预措施

SCI-Co研究的基线结果。

结局指标

无。

结果

总体而言,全科医生与SCI专科医生之间合作的满意度较高,所有医生都认为他们合作良好。特别是,SCI专科医生对与全科医生的合作感到满意。尽管瑞士的初级和二级护理系统分散,但只有少数医生报告了延误和候诊名单方面的问题。虽然全科医生希望提高转诊质量,但大多数SCI专科医生表示对此感到满意。全科医生也对专科医生的出院安排不满。

结论

全科医生和专科医生对合作的满意度都很高。需要改进的方面包括出院和转诊流程。

相似文献

1
Improving collaboration between specialists and general practitioners in services for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury living in rural areas of Switzerland: Baseline results from the SCI-Co study.改善瑞士农村地区慢性脊髓损伤患者服务中专科医生与全科医生之间的协作:SCI-Co研究的基线结果
J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 May;47(3):423-431. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2097996. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
2
Role distribution and collaboration between specialists and rural general practitioners in long-term chronic care: a qualitative study in Switzerland.专科医生与农村全科医生在长期慢性病护理中的角色分配和协作:瑞士的一项定性研究。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2022 Dec 20;152:40015. doi: 10.57187/smw.2022.40015.
3
Communication with general practitioners: a survey of spinal cord injury physicians' perspectives.与全科医生的沟通:脊髓损伤医生观点的调查
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019 May 13;5:44. doi: 10.1038/s41394-019-0187-7. eCollection 2019.
4
Motives and preferences of general practitioners for new collaboration models with medical specialists: a qualitative study.全科医生对与医学专家建立新型合作模式的动机和偏好:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jan 5;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-4.
5
Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study.全科医生与高度专科医生在慢性脊髓损伤中的共同责任:一项全国性实用非随机干预研究的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Nov 17;24:100873. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100873. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
Why Do Community-Dwelling Persons with Spinal Cord Injury Visit General Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study of Reasons for Encounter in Swiss General Practice.脊髓损伤的社区居民为何就诊于全科医生:瑞士全科医疗中就诊原因的横断面研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Sep 12;15:2041-2052. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S382087. eCollection 2022.
7
First contact of care for persons with spinal cord injury: a general practitioner or a spinal cord injury specialist?脊髓损伤患者的首次医疗接触:全科医生还是脊髓损伤专家?
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Oct 2;22(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01547-0.
8
Referral to massage therapy in primary health care: a survey of medical general practitioners in rural and regional New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村及地区基层医疗保健中按摩疗法的转诊情况:对医学全科医生的一项调查
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2013 Nov-Dec;36(9):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2013.09.003. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
9
Communication between general practitioners and medical specialists in the referral process: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries.全科医生和转诊过程中的医学专家之间的沟通:34 个国家的横断面调查。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Mar 17;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01124-x.
10
Collaboration with general practitioners: preferences of medical specialists--a qualitative study.与全科医生的合作:医学专家的偏好——一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Dec 4;6:155. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-155.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study.全科医生与高度专科医生在慢性脊髓损伤中的共同责任:一项全国性实用非随机干预研究的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Nov 17;24:100873. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100873. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
First contact of care for persons with spinal cord injury: a general practitioner or a spinal cord injury specialist?脊髓损伤患者的首次医疗接触:全科医生还是脊髓损伤专家?
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Oct 2;22(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01547-0.
3
The patient at the centre: evidence from 17 European integrated care programmes for persons with complex needs.中心的患者:来自 17 个欧洲综合关怀计划为有复杂需求的人的证据。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 30;20(1):1102. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05917-9.
4
Competencies to promote collaboration between primary and secondary care doctors: an integrative review.促进初级保健医生和二级保健医生合作的能力:综合评价。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Sep 2;21(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01234-6.
5
Outpatient and community care for preventing pressure injuries in spinal cord injury. A qualitative study of service users' and providers' experience.门诊和社区护理预防脊髓损伤压力性损伤。服务使用者和提供者经验的定性研究。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Aug;58(8):882-891. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0444-4. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
6
General practitioners referring patients to specialists in tertiary healthcare: a qualitative study.全科医生将患者转诊至三级保健专科医生:一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Dec 1;20(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1053-1.
7
Communication with general practitioners: a survey of spinal cord injury physicians' perspectives.与全科医生的沟通:脊髓损伤医生观点的调查
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019 May 13;5:44. doi: 10.1038/s41394-019-0187-7. eCollection 2019.
8
High-performing physicians are more likely to participate in a research study: findings from a quality improvement study.表现出色的医生更有可能参与研究:一项质量改进研究的结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Aug 7;19(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0809-6.
9
Family practitioners' top medical priorities when managing patients with multimorbidity: a cross-sectional study.家庭医生在管理患有多种疾病的患者时的首要医疗重点:一项横断面研究。
BJGP Open. 2019 Jan 23;3(1):bjgpopen18X101622. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101622. eCollection 2019 Apr.
10
Advancing primary and community care for persons with spinal cord injury: Key findings from a Canadian summit.推进脊髓损伤患者的初级和社区护理:加拿大峰会的主要发现。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Mar;43(2):223-233. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1552643. Epub 2018 Dec 17.