Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2022 Dec;23(12):1290-1300. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2022.0741.
"Diagnostic yield," also referred to as the detection rate, is a parameter positioned between diagnostic accuracy and diagnosis-related patient outcomes in research studies that assess diagnostic tests. Unfamiliarity with the term may lead to incorrect usage and delivery of information. Herein, we evaluate the level of proper use of the term "diagnostic yield" and its related parameters in articles published in and ().
Potentially relevant articles published since 2012 in these journals were identified using MEDLINE and PubMed Central databases. The initial search yielded 239 articles. We evaluated whether the correct definition and study setting of "diagnostic yield" or "detection rate" were used and whether the articles also reported companion parameters for false-positive results. We calculated the proportion of articles that correctly used these parameters and evaluated whether the proportion increased with time (2012-2016 vs. 2017-2022).
Among 39 eligible articles (19 from and 20 from ), 17 (43.6%; 11 from and 6 from ) correctly defined "diagnostic yield" or "detection rate." The remaining 22 articles used "diagnostic yield" or "detection rate" with incorrect meanings such as "diagnostic performance" or "sensitivity." The proportion of correctly used diagnostic terms was higher in the studies published in than in those published in (57.9% vs. 30.0%). The proportion improved with time in (33.3% vs. 80.0%), whereas no improvement was observed in over time (33.3% vs. 27.3%). The proportion of studies reporting companion parameters was similar between journals (72.7% vs. 66.7%), and no considerable improvement was observed over time.
Overall, a minority of articles accurately used "diagnostic yield" or "detection rate." Incorrect usage of the terms was more frequent without improvement over time in than in . Therefore, improvements are required in the use and reporting of these parameters.
“诊断收益”,也称为检出率,是评估诊断测试的研究中处于诊断准确性和诊断相关患者结局之间的一个参数。不熟悉该术语可能导致信息的不正确使用和传递。在此,我们评估了在 和 ()中发表的文章中正确使用“诊断收益”及其相关参数的水平。
使用 MEDLINE 和 PubMed Central 数据库确定了自 2012 年以来这些期刊中发表的潜在相关文章。最初的搜索产生了 239 篇文章。我们评估了是否正确使用了“诊断收益”或“检出率”的正确定义和研究设置,以及文章是否还报告了假阳性结果的伴随参数。我们计算了正确使用这些参数的文章比例,并评估了该比例是否随时间增加(2012-2016 年与 2017-2022 年)。
在 39 篇符合条件的文章中( 中的 19 篇和 中的 20 篇),有 17 篇(43.6%; 中的 11 篇和 中的 6 篇)正确定义了“诊断收益”或“检出率”。其余 22 篇文章错误地使用了“诊断收益”或“检出率”等术语,如“诊断性能”或“敏感性”。发表在 中的研究中正确使用诊断术语的比例高于发表在 中的研究(57.9%比 30.0%)。在 中,随着时间的推移,该比例有所提高(33.3%比 80.0%),而在 中,随着时间的推移,该比例没有提高(33.3%比 27.3%)。报告伴随参数的研究比例在两个期刊之间相似(72.7%比 66.7%),并且随着时间的推移没有明显提高。
总体而言,少数文章准确使用了“诊断收益”或“检出率”。在 中,术语的不正确使用更为频繁,且随着时间的推移没有改善,而在 中则不然。因此,需要改进这些参数的使用和报告。