Comparative Analysis of a Locally Resampling MR Elastography Reconstruction Algorithm in Liver Fibrosis.

BACKGROUND

In magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), the precision of the observed mechanical depends on the ratio between mechanical wavelength and spatial resolution. Since the mechanical wavelength may vary with actuation frequency, between patients and depending on position, a unique spatial resolution may not always generate an optimal ratio for multifrequency acquisitions, in patients with varying degrees of disease or in mechanically heterogeneous organs.

PURPOSE

To describe an MRE reconstruction algorithm that adjusts the ratio between shear wavelength and pixel size, by locally resampling the matrix of shear displacement, and to assess its performance relative to existing reconstructions in different use cases.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

POPULATION

Four phantoms, 20 healthy volunteers (5 men, median age 34, range 20-56) and 46 patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (37 men, median age 63, range 33-83).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3 T; gradient-echo elastography sequence with 40 Hz, 60 Hz, and 80 Hz frequencies.

ASSESSMENT

For each algorithm, phantoms stiffness were compared against their nominal values, repeatability was calculated in healthy volunteers, and diagnostic performance in detecting advanced liver fibrosis was assessed in 46 patients.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Linear regression was used to evaluate the agreement between stiffness values and phantoms stiffnesses. Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate repeatability in volunteers. The ability to diagnose advanced fibrosis was assessed by receiver operating curve analysis (with Youden index thresholds). Significance was considered at P value of 0.05.

RESULTS

From the linear regression, the slope closest to 1 is provided by MARS (40 Hz) and k-MDEV (60H, 80 Hz). Repeatability index was best with MDEV (23%) and lowest with k-MDEV (53%). The best performance in detecting advanced fibrosis was provided by MARS at 40 Hz (area under the operating curve, AUC = 0.88), k-MDEV and MARS at 60 Hz (AUC = 0.91), and multimodel direct inversion (MMDI) and MARS at 80 Hz (AUC = 0.90).

DATA CONCLUSION

MARS shows the best diagnostic performance to detect advanced fibrosis and the second-best results in phantoms after k-MDEV.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

TECHNICAL EFFICACY

Stage 2.