Zhang Yan, Liu Yan, Li Zongxin, Liu Xin, Chen Qingfei, Qin Jingyao, Liao Qilong, Du Rui, Deng Qifei, Xiao Yongmei, Xing Xiumei
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 74 Zhongshan Road 2, Yuexiu District, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 74 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(11):31620-31630. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24414-6. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
Many harmful factors existing simultaneously with noise are reported to induce hearing impairment, such as organic solvents. However, the existing hearing safety limits and current risk assessment for hearing loss rely on single noise exposure. It is urgent to clarify the combined effect of noise and other harmful factors on hearing loss. Petrochemical workers are always exposed to noise and organic solvents, mainly benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylene, and styrene (BTEXS), while the combined effect of their coexposure on hearing remains unclear. Herein we conducted a cross-sectional survey, measuring pure-tone audiometry of 1496 petrochemical workers in southern China. Participants exposed to BTEXS were 569, 524, 156, 452, and 177 respectively. Individual cumulative noise exposure (CNE) levels and BTEXS exposure were assessed. The average CNE was 93.27 ± 4.92 dB(A)·years, and the concentrations of BTEXS were far below the occupational exposure limits of China. Logistic regression analyses showed that CNE was consistently positively associated with hearing loss (HL) and high-frequency hearing loss (HFHL) but not related to speech-frequency hearing loss (SFHL). Compared with participants in the lowest quartile of CNE, those in the highest quartile showed an OR of 5.229 (95% CI: 3.179, 8.598) for HFHL. Two-pollutant model analysis indicated that TEXS exposure was positively associated with HL (OR 1.679, 95%CI 1.086, 2.597), SFHL (OR 2.440, 95%CI 1.255, 4.744), and HFHL (OR 1.475, 95%CI 1.077, 2.020). However, no interactions were observed between CNE and TEXS coexposure on hearing loss. In our study, covariates including smoking and drinking status, body mass index (BMI), ear protection and personal protective equipment, and use of earphone/headphone were adjusted. In conclusion, coexposure to noise and low-level TEXS could induce more severe damage on hearing function than exposure to each alone, especially SFHL. Therefore, petrochemical workers simultaneously exposed to noise and TEXS, even at low-level, should be included in hearing protection programs.
据报道,许多与噪声同时存在的有害因素会导致听力损伤,比如有机溶剂。然而,现有的听力安全限值和当前针对听力损失的风险评估都依赖于单一噪声暴露情况。阐明噪声与其他有害因素对听力损失的联合影响迫在眉睫。石化行业工人经常暴露于噪声和有机溶剂中,主要是苯、甲苯、乙苯、二甲苯和苯乙烯(BTEXS),而它们共同暴露对听力的联合影响仍不清楚。在此,我们进行了一项横断面调查,对中国南方1496名石化行业工人进行了纯音听力测定。暴露于BTEXS的参与者分别有569人、524人、156人、452人和177人。评估了个体累积噪声暴露(CNE)水平和BTEXS暴露情况。平均CNE为93.27±4.92 dB(A)·年,BTEXS的浓度远低于中国的职业接触限值。逻辑回归分析表明,CNE始终与听力损失(HL)和高频听力损失(HFHL)呈正相关,但与言语频率听力损失(SFHL)无关。与CNE处于最低四分位数的参与者相比,最高四分位数的参与者发生HFHL的比值比为5.229(95%置信区间:3.179, 8.598)。双污染物模型分析表明,TEXS暴露与HL(比值比1.679,95%置信区间1.086, 2.597)、SFHL(比值比2.440,95%置信区间1.255, 4.744)和HFHL(比值比1.475,95%置信区间1.077, 2.020)呈正相关。然而,未观察到CNE与TEXS共同暴露对听力损失有相互作用。在我们的研究中,对包括吸烟和饮酒状况、体重指数(BMI)、耳部防护和个人防护装备以及耳机/头戴式耳机使用情况等协变量进行了调整。总之,噪声与低水平TEXS共同暴露比单独暴露于其中任何一种对听力功能造成的损害更严重,尤其是对SFHL。因此,即使是同时暴露于低水平噪声和TEXS的石化行业工人也应纳入听力保护计划。