Brock Kris L, Zolkoske Jamie, Cummings Alycia, Ogiela Diane A
Idaho State University, Meridian.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Dec 12;65(12):4741-4760. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00022. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
The graphic symbol is the foundation of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) for many preliterate individuals; however, research has focused primarily on static graphic symbol sequences despite mainstream commercial technologies such as animation. The goal of this study was to compare static and animated symbol sequences across receptive communication outcome measures and psycholinguistic features (e.g., word frequency).
A counterbalanced, 2 × 2 × 2 mixed design was used to investigate the effects of symbol format (animated and static), first condition (animated or static), and first experimental task (identification or labeling) on identification accuracy and labeling accuracy of graphic symbol sequences (five symbols) in 24 children with typical development ages 7 and 8 years old. Additionally, three 2 × 2 repeated-measures analyses of variance were conducted using symbol format (animated and static) and (a) word frequency (low, high), (b) imageability (low, high), and (c) concreteness (low, high).
In addition to superior identification and labeling accuracy of animated sequences, a significant interaction between symbol format and the first condition was observed for both experimental tasks. When the animation format was the first condition, then the children's performance improved in the subsequent static condition. Finally, word frequency, imageability, and concreteness ratings for all verbs and prepositions had significant effects on labeling accuracy of verbs and prepositions. Significant interactions between symbol format and psycholinguistic features were also found. For example, highly imageable, animated verbs were labeled with greater accuracy when compared with all other variables.
Animation technology appears to alleviate some of the burden associated with word- and sentence-level outcomes in children with typical development. Moreover, animation appears to reduce the effects of psycholinguistic features such as word frequency and imageability by increasing the transparency of the symbol. Given the increase in research in this area, speech-language pathologists may consider adopting animated graphic symbols on a case-by-case basis as a tool to augment the learning of word classes in which movement is integral to comprehension.
对于许多尚未识字的个体而言,图形符号是辅助和替代沟通(AAC)的基础;然而,尽管有动画等主流商业技术,但研究主要集中在静态图形符号序列上。本研究的目的是在接受性沟通结果测量和心理语言学特征(如词频)方面比较静态和动画符号序列。
采用平衡的2×2×2混合设计,研究符号形式(动画和静态)、第一种条件(动画或静态)和第一个实验任务(识别或标注)对24名7至8岁发育正常儿童图形符号序列(五个符号)识别准确性和标注准确性的影响。此外,使用符号形式(动画和静态)以及(a)词频(低、高)、(b)可意象性(低、高)和(c)具体性(低、高)进行了三项2×2重复测量方差分析。
除了动画序列具有更高的识别和标注准确性外,在两项实验任务中均观察到符号形式与第一种条件之间存在显著交互作用。当动画形式为第一种条件时,儿童在随后的静态条件下表现有所改善。最后,所有动词和介词的词频、可意象性和具体性评级对动词和介词的标注准确性有显著影响。还发现符号形式与心理语言学特征之间存在显著交互作用。例如,与所有其他变量相比,高度可意象的动画动词标注准确性更高。
动画技术似乎减轻了发育正常儿童在单词和句子层面结果方面的一些负担。此外,动画似乎通过提高符号的透明度来减少词频和可意象性等心理语言学特征的影响。鉴于该领域研究的增加,言语语言病理学家可考虑根据具体情况采用动画图形符号作为一种工具,以增强对其中动作对于理解至关重要的词类的学习。