• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糠酸莫米松鼻喷雾剂与糠酸氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎有效性的比较:一项基于医院的一年期研究

Comparison Between Effectiveness of Topical Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray Versus Topical Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A One Year Hospital Based Study.

作者信息

Harugop Anil S, Havaldar Rajesh R, Patil P H

机构信息

Department of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, J.N. Medical College, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Belagavi, Karnataka India.

出版信息

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):821-825. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01872-3. Epub 2020 May 6.

DOI:10.1007/s12070-020-01872-3
PMID:36452763
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9702125/
Abstract

To compare the effectiveness between topical mometasone furoate nasal spray versus topical fluticasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Randomized control trial was conducted involving 70 patients. One group received topical mometasone furoate nasal spray and the other group received fluticasone furoate nasal spray for 3 weeks. All patients were prescribed oral ciprofloxacin for 3 weeks and were subjectively evaluated using the Lund and Mackay staging system and objectively using nasal endoscopy by the Lund and Kennedy scoring system. There was no inter group significance but all patients improved significantly after the administration of either of the steroid sprays. Following administration of steroid nasal sprays, there was clinically significant improvement in the symptoms and signs of chronic rhinosinusitis, but there was no statistical significance between the two study groups. Thus, steroid nasal sprays significantly improve the symptoms and resolution of signs of chronic rhinosinusitis. The choice of drug still remains uncertain to the clinician. However, long term studies with more sample size is needed to arrive at sound conclusions.

摘要

比较糠酸莫米松鼻喷雾剂与糠酸氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的疗效。进行了一项随机对照试验,纳入70例患者。一组接受糠酸莫米松鼻喷雾剂治疗,另一组接受糠酸氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂治疗,为期3周。所有患者均口服环丙沙星3周,并采用Lund和Mackay分期系统进行主观评估,以及采用Lund和Kennedy评分系统通过鼻内镜进行客观评估。组间无显著差异,但使用任何一种类固醇喷雾剂后所有患者均有显著改善。使用类固醇鼻喷雾剂后,慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的症状和体征有临床显著改善,但两个研究组之间无统计学差异。因此,类固醇鼻喷雾剂可显著改善慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的症状和体征消退情况。临床医生对药物的选择仍不确定。然而,需要进行更多样本量的长期研究才能得出可靠结论。

相似文献

1
Comparison Between Effectiveness of Topical Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray Versus Topical Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A One Year Hospital Based Study.糠酸莫米松鼻喷雾剂与糠酸氟替卡松鼻喷雾剂治疗慢性鼻-鼻窦炎有效性的比较:一项基于医院的一年期研究
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Oct;74(Suppl 2):821-825. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01872-3. Epub 2020 May 6.
2
Comparison of once daily mometasone furoate (Nasonex) and fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal sprays for the treatment of perennial rhinitis. 194-079 Study Group.糠酸莫米松(内舒拿)每日一次与丙酸氟替卡松水性鼻喷雾剂治疗常年性鼻炎的比较。194 - 079研究组。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Oct;79(4):370-8. doi: 10.1016/s1081-1206(10)63030-x.
3
Comparison of once daily mometasone furoate (Nasonex) and fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal sprays for the treatment of perennial rhinitis. The 194-079 Study Group.糠酸莫米松(内舒拿)每日一次与丙酸氟替卡松水性鼻喷雾剂治疗常年性鼻炎的比较。194 - 079研究组。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Sep;79(3):237-45.
4
Randomized clinical trial to evaluate mometasone lavage vs spray for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps who have not undergone sinus surgery.一项评估莫米松灌洗与喷雾用于未经鼻窦手术的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎伴鼻息肉患者的随机临床试验。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Aug;10(8):936-943. doi: 10.1002/alr.22586. Epub 2020 May 29.
5
Randomized, double-masked comparison of olopatadine ophthalmic solution, mometasone furoate monohydrate nasal spray, and fexofenadine hydrochloride tablets using the conjunctival and nasal allergen challenge models.使用结膜和鼻腔过敏原激发模型对奥洛他定滴眼液、糠酸莫米松一水合物鼻喷雾剂和盐酸非索非那定片进行随机、双盲比较。
Clin Ther. 2003 Aug;25(8):2245-67. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(03)80217-5.
6
Comparison of efficacy of mometasone furoate versus clarithromycin in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps in Chinese adults.糠酸莫米松与克拉霉素治疗中国成年非鼻息肉慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的疗效比较。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):e203-7. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3728.
7
Efficacy of mometasone furoate and fluticasone furoate on persistent allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.糠酸莫米松和糠酸氟替卡松对持续性变应性鼻结膜炎的疗效。
Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2013 Fall;4(3):e120-6. doi: 10.2500/ar.2013.4.0065.
8
Preference evaluation and perceived sensory comparison of fluticasone furoate and mometasone furoate intranasal sprays in allergic rhinitis.糠酸氟替卡松和糠酸莫米松鼻喷雾剂在变应性鼻炎中的偏好评估及感知的感觉比较
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016 Jun;43(3):292-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
9
Subjective and objective assessments in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: effects of therapy with mometasone furoate nasal spray.季节性变应性鼻炎患者的主观和客观评估:糠酸莫米松鼻喷雾剂的治疗效果
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998 Jul;102(1):39-49. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70053-3.
10
Efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and tolerability of mometasone furoate, levocabastine, and disodium cromoglycate nasal sprays in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.糠酸莫米松、左卡巴斯汀和色甘酸钠鼻喷雾剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎的疗效、成本效益及耐受性
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Sep;95(3):272-82. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61225-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Rhinotopic therapy for refractory chronic rhinosinusitis: a study of 20 cases.难治性慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的鼻局部治疗:20例研究
Ear Nose Throat J. 2014 Apr-May;93(4-5):E48-54.
2
Treatment options for chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的治疗选择。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011 Mar;8(1):132-40. doi: 10.1513/pats.201003-028RN.
3
Maximal medical therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的最大程度药物治疗
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;38(6):1301-10, x. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2005.07.003.
4
Adult chronic rhinosinusitis: definitions, diagnosis, epidemiology, and pathophysiology.成人慢性鼻-鼻窦炎:定义、诊断、流行病学及病理生理学
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Sep;129(3 Suppl):S1-32. doi: 10.1016/s0194-5998(03)01397-4.