Lessons learnt from the International Peer Review Week 2022 with the theme - "Research Integrity: Creating and supporting trust in research".
作者信息
Sengupta Sabyasachi
机构信息
Future Vision Eye Care and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
出版信息
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4099-4100. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2920_22.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Lessons learnt from the International Peer Review Week 2022 with the theme - "Research Integrity: Creating and supporting trust in research".从2022年国际同行评审周汲取的经验教训，主题为——“研究诚信：建立并支持对研究的信任”。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;70(12):4099-4100. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2920_22.
2
Peer Review Week 2020: Insights into Building Trust in Peer Review.2020 年同行评审周：深入了解如何建立同行评审信任。
Pak J Biol Sci. 2020 Jan;23(12):1496-1499. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2020.1496.1499.
3
Peer Review Week 2020: Trust in Peer Review.2020年同行评审周：对同行评审的信任。
J Neurosci. 2020 Sep 23;40(39):7378. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2303-20.2020.
4
Trust, Peer Review, and the Pandemic.信任、同行评审与疫情
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2020 Sep;33(9):455-456. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000694252.55935.8d.
5
Addressing harm and establishing trust in peer review: Recommendations for action.应对同行评审中的危害并建立信任：行动建议。
Med Educ. 2022 Mar;56(3):256-259. doi: 10.1111/medu.14732. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Elements of trust in peer review (and our annual thanks).
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Nov;8(11):e1366-e1367. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30416-2. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
7
Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?作者是否应被要求推荐同行评审人？
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Feb;24(1):275-285. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9842-6. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
8
Trust in Peer Review.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Oct;26(10):595-596. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000947.
9
Ghost- and guest-authored pharmaceutical industry-sponsored studies: abuse of academic integrity, the peer review system, and public trust.幽灵和客座作者撰写的制药业赞助研究：学术诚信、同行评审系统和公众信任的滥用。
Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Jul-Aug;47(7-8):1081-3. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R691. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
10
Peer review: maintaining trust in research funding decisions.同行评审：维持对研究资金决策的信任。
Med J Aust. 2015 Feb 2;202(2):65. doi: 10.5694/mja14.01475.
本文引用的文献
1
An editorial perspective on the infamous COVID-19 studies retracted by Lancet and NEJM.《柳叶刀》和《新英格兰医学杂志》撤回的臭名昭著的新冠病毒研究的编辑观点。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul;68(7):1247-1248. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1853_20.
Zotero 插件