Suppr超能文献

明确、审慎且针对具体情境的伦理分析在卫生技术评估中的价值:来自南非试点的一种新方法的证据

The Value of Explicit, Deliberative, and Context-Specified Ethics Analysis for Health Technology Assessment: Evidence From a Novel Approach Piloted in South Africa.

作者信息

Krubiner Carleigh B, Tugendhaft Aviva, DiStefano Michael J, Barsdorf Nicola W, Merritt Maria W, Goldstein Susan J, Mosam Atiya, Potgieter Sunita, Hofman Karen J, Faden Ruth R

机构信息

Center for Global Development, Washington, DC, USA; Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC)/Wits Centre for Health Economics and Decision Science - PRICELESS, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

Value Health Reg Issues. 2023 Mar;34:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2022.10.003. Epub 2022 Nov 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This article explores the perceived value, including associated strengths and challenges, of using a context-specified ethics framework to guide deliberative health technology appraisals.

METHODS

The South African Values and Ethics for Universal Health Coverage (SAVE-UHC) approach, piloted in South Africa, consisted of 2 phases: (1) convening a national multistakeholder working group to develop a provisional ethics framework and (2) testing the provisional ethics framework through simulated health technology assessment appraisal committee meetings (SACs). Three SACs each reviewed 2 case studies of sample health interventions using the framework. Participants completed postappraisal questionnaires and engaged in focus group discussions.

RESULTS

The SACs involved 27 participants across 3 provinces. Findings from the postappraisal questionnaires demonstrated general support for the SAVE-UHC approach and content of the framework, high levels of satisfaction with the recommendations produced, and general sentiment that participants were able to actively contribute to appraisals. Qualitative data showed participants perceived using a context-specified ethics framework in deliberative decision making: (1) supported wider consideration of and deliberation about morally relevant features of the health coverage decisions, thereby contributing to quality of appraisals; (2) could improve transparency; and (3) offered benefits to those directly involved in the priority-setting process. Participants also identified some challenges and concerns associated with the approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAVE-UHC approach presents a novel way to develop and pilot a locally contextualized, explicit ethics framework for health priority setting. This work highlights how the combination of a context-specified ethics framework and structured deliberative appraisals can contribute to the quality of health technology appraisals and transparency of health priority setting.

摘要

目标

本文探讨使用针对具体情境的伦理框架来指导审议性卫生技术评估的感知价值,包括相关优势和挑战。

方法

在南非试行的“南非全民健康覆盖的价值观与伦理”(SAVE-UHC)方法包括两个阶段:(1)召集全国多利益相关方工作组制定临时伦理框架;(2)通过模拟卫生技术评估评审委员会会议(SACs)对临时伦理框架进行测试。三个SAC分别使用该框架审查了2个卫生干预措施案例研究。参与者完成评估后问卷并参与焦点小组讨论。

结果

SAC涉及3个省份的27名参与者。评估后问卷的结果表明,总体上支持SAVE-UHC方法和框架内容,对所产生的建议满意度较高,并且普遍认为参与者能够积极为评估做出贡献。定性数据显示,参与者认为在审议决策中使用针对具体情境的伦理框架:(1)支持更广泛地考虑和审议卫生覆盖决策中与道德相关的特征,从而提高评估质量;(2)可以提高透明度;(3)对直接参与优先事项设定过程的人员有益。参与者还指出了与该方法相关的一些挑战和担忧。

结论

SAVE-UHC方法为制定和试行针对当地情况的、明确的卫生优先事项设定伦理框架提供了一种新颖的方式。这项工作突出了针对具体情境的伦理框架与结构化审议评估相结合如何能够提高卫生技术评估的质量以及卫生优先事项设定的透明度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验