Suppr超能文献

支气管镜肺减容术麻醉管理的安全性及注意事项。

Safety and Considerations of the Anaesthetic Management during Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Treatments.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Respiration. 2023;102(1):55-63. doi: 10.1159/000528044. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different bronchoscopic lung volume reduction approaches are available for a select group of patients with advanced COPD. General anaesthesia is the recommended method of sedation during these procedures. However, this patient population is at an increased risk of anaesthetic complications, and the best approach to general anaesthesia and mechanical ventilation is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to describe the anaesthetic management techniques used during bronchoscopic lung volume reduction procedures and to investigate the number of anaesthesia-related events.

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected from all endobronchial valve and lung volume reduction coil procedures performed between January 2018 and March 2020 in our hospital. Primary outcomes measures were anaesthetic technique including airway management; ventilation mode and settings; and the incidence of anaesthesia-related events, classified as catastrophic, severe, significant, or moderate.

RESULTS

202 procedures were included. One procedure was performed under procedural sedation, 198 (98%) under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation, and 3 (1.5%) under general anaesthesia with laryngeal mask airway. Volume-controlled ventilation was used in 64% of the procedures and pressure-controlled in 36%. Patients were ventilated with a median respiration rate of 9.9 (IQR: 9.6-10.6) breaths per minute, mean tidal volume of 5.8 ± 1.4 mL/kg, and median inspiratory to expiratory (I:E) ratio of 1:2.8 (IQR: 1:2.1-1:3.2). No catastrophic anaesthesia-related events were observed. Hypotension was the most observed anaesthesia-related event.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the presence of advanced COPD, general anaesthesia and mechanical ventilation are well tolerated by patients undergoing endobronchial valve or lung volume reduction coil treatment. This is presumably strongly linked to the strict selection criteria. Other important considerations are using a low respiratory rate, low tidal volume, and high I:E ratio.

摘要

背景

对于一组患有晚期 COPD 的特定患者,有多种支气管镜肺减容方法。全身麻醉是这些手术中镇静的推荐方法。然而,这类患者人群存在麻醉并发症的风险增加,全身麻醉和机械通气的最佳方法尚不清楚。

目的

本研究旨在描述支气管镜肺减容术中使用的麻醉管理技术,并调查麻醉相关事件的数量。

方法

从 2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月在我院进行的所有支气管内瓣膜和肺减容线圈手术中回顾性收集数据。主要结局指标为包括气道管理在内的麻醉技术;通气模式和设置;以及麻醉相关事件的发生率,分为灾难性、严重、显著或中度。

结果

共纳入 202 例手术。1 例在程序镇静下进行,198 例(98%)在全身麻醉下气管插管进行,3 例(1.5%)在全身麻醉下喉罩气道进行。64%的手术采用容量控制通气,36%采用压力控制通气。患者呼吸频率中位数为 9.9(IQR:9.6-10.6)次/分钟,平均潮气量为 5.8±1.4ml/kg,吸气与呼气(I:E)比中位数为 1:2.8(IQR:1:2.1-1:3.2)。未观察到灾难性麻醉相关事件。低血压是最常见的麻醉相关事件。

结论

尽管存在晚期 COPD,但接受支气管内瓣膜或肺减容线圈治疗的患者仍能很好地耐受全身麻醉和机械通气。这很可能与严格的选择标准密切相关。其他重要的考虑因素是使用低呼吸频率、低潮气量和高 I:E 比。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/437d/9843542/53fa9e3b205e/res-0102-0055-g01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验