• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支气管腔内线圈系统与标准医疗管理治疗严重肺气肿患者的比较。

Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Karl-Landsteiner-Institute for Lung Research and Pulmonary Oncology, Klinik Floridsdorf, Floridsdorf, Austria.

出版信息

Respiration. 2021;100(8):804-810. doi: 10.1159/000515744. Epub 2021 May 7.

DOI:10.1159/000515744
PMID:33965944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8491498/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial coils is a new treatment for patients with severe emphysema. To date, the benefits have been modest and have been suggested to be much larger in patients with severe hyperinflation and nonmulti-comorbidity.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endobronchial coil treatment in a randomized multicenter clinical trial using optimized patient selection.

METHOD

Patients with severe emphysema on HRCT scan with severe hyperinflation (residual volume [RV] ≥200% predicted and RV/total lung capacity [TLC] >55%) were randomized to coil treatment or control. Primary outcome measures were differences in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at 6 months.

RESULTS

Due to premature study termination, a total of 120 patients (age 63 ± 7 years, FEV1 29 ± 7% predicted, RV 251 ± 41% predicted, RV/TLC 67 ± 6%, and SGRQ 58 ± 13 points), instead of 210 patients, were randomized. At study termination, 91 patients (57 coil and 34 control) had 6-month results available. Analyses showed significantly greater improvements in favor of the coil group. The increase in FEV1 was greater in the coil group than that in the control group by + 10.3 [+4.7 to +16.0] % and in SGRQ by -10.6 [-15.9 to -5.4] points. At study termination, there were 5 (6.8%) deaths in the coil cohort reported.

CONCLUSION

Despite early study termination, coil treatment compared to control results in a significant improvement in the lung function and quality of life benefits for up to 6 months in patients with emphysema and severe hyperinflation. These improvements were of clinical importance but were associated with a higher likelihood of serious adverse events.

摘要

背景

支气管镜肺减容术使用支气管内线圈是一种治疗严重肺气肿患者的新方法。迄今为止,其疗效有限,并且在严重过度充气和非多合并症患者中效果更大。

目的

我们旨在通过优化患者选择,在一项随机多中心临床试验中评估支气管内线圈治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

对 HRCT 扫描显示严重肺气肿、严重过度充气(残气量[RV]≥200%预测值且 RV/总肺容量[TLC]>55%)的患者进行随机分组,接受线圈治疗或对照组治疗。主要终点测量指标为治疗 6 个月时用力呼气量 1 秒率(FEV1)和圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)总评分的差异。

结果

由于研究提前终止,共有 120 名患者(年龄 63±7 岁,FEV1 预测值 29±7%,RV 预测值 251±41%,RV/TLC 67±6%,和 SGRQ 58±13 分),而不是 210 名患者被随机分组。研究终止时,91 名患者(线圈组 57 名,对照组 34 名)有 6 个月的结果。分析表明,线圈组明显更有利于改善。与对照组相比,线圈组的 FEV1 增加了+10.3[+4.7 至+16.0]%,SGRQ 减少了-10.6[-15.9 至-5.4]分。研究终止时,线圈组有 5 名(6.8%)患者死亡。

结论

尽管研究提前终止,但与对照组相比,线圈治疗在 6 个月内可显著改善肺气肿和严重过度充气患者的肺功能和生活质量,这些改善具有临床意义,但与严重不良事件的发生几率较高相关。

相似文献

1
Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema.支气管腔内线圈系统与标准医疗管理治疗严重肺气肿患者的比较。
Respiration. 2021;100(8):804-810. doi: 10.1159/000515744. Epub 2021 May 7.
2
Effect of Endobronchial Coils vs Usual Care on Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Severe Emphysema: The RENEW Randomized Clinical Trial.经支气管镜线圈置入与常规治疗对重度肺气肿患者运动耐量的影响:RENEW 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016;315(20):2178-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6261.
3
Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Study of the PneumRx Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema (ELEVATE).随机对照研究方案:PneumRx 支气管内线圈系统与标准医疗管理治疗严重肺气肿患者的对照(ELEVATE)。
Respiration. 2019;98(6):512-520. doi: 10.1159/000502100. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
4
Lung volume reduction coil treatment for patients with severe emphysema: a European multicentre trial.重度肺气肿患者的肺减容线圈治疗:一项欧洲多中心试验。
Thorax. 2014 Nov;69(11):980-6. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205221. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
5
Identifying Responders and Exploring Mechanisms of Action of the Endobronchial Coil Treatment for Emphysema.确定内支气管线圈治疗肺气肿的应答者并探索其作用机制。
Respiration. 2021;100(5):443-451. doi: 10.1159/000514319. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
6
Design of the Endobronchial Valve for Emphysema Palliation Trial (VENT): a non-surgical method of lung volume reduction.用于肺气肿姑息治疗试验的支气管内瓣膜设计(VENT):一种非手术性肺减容方法。
BMC Pulm Med. 2007 Jul 3;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-7-10.
7
Determining Static Hyperinflation in Patients with Severe Emphysema: Relation Between Lung Function Parameters and Patient-Related Outcomes.确定严重肺气肿患者的静态过度充气:肺功能参数与患者相关结局的关系。
Lung. 2020 Aug;198(4):629-636. doi: 10.1007/s00408-020-00368-9. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
8
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction for pulmonary emphysema: preliminary experience with endobronchial occluder.支气管镜肺减容术治疗肺气肿:支气管内封堵器的初步经验。
Respir Care. 2013 Aug;58(8):1351-9. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02218. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
9
Predictors of Response to Endobronchial Coil Therapy in Patients With Advanced Emphysema.预测晚期肺气肿患者对支气管内线圈治疗反应的因素。
Chest. 2019 May;155(5):928-937. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
10
Endobronchial Valve Treatment in Emphysema Patients with a Very Low DLCO.肺气肿患者极低 DLCO 时的支气管内瓣膜治疗。
Respiration. 2020;99(2):163-170. doi: 10.1159/000505428. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Airway Scaffolds for Emphysema-related Hyperinflation: Six-Month Results from the BREATHE Trial.用于肺气肿相关肺过度充气的气道支架:BREATHE试验的六个月结果
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Jul;211(7):1175-1184. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202502-0378OC.
2
Interventional pulmonology for chronic inflammatory airway diseases.慢性炎症性气道疾病的介入肺脏病学
Chin Med J Pulm Crit Care Med. 2024 Sep 17;2(3):171-181. doi: 10.1016/j.pccm.2024.08.001. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Lung Tensioning Device Coil Treatment in Patients with Severe Emphysema: A Prospective Safety and Feasibility Trial (EFFORT).重度肺气肿患者的肺张力装置线圈治疗:一项前瞻性安全性和可行性试验(EFFORT)
Respiration. 2025;104(1):58-68. doi: 10.1159/000541366. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
4
ERJ Advances: interventional bronchoscopy.《欧洲呼吸学杂志进展》:介入性支气管镜检查。
Eur Respir J. 2024 Jul 11;64(1). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01946-2023. Print 2024 Jul.
5
Surgical and bronchoscopic pulmonary function-improving procedures in lung emphysema.肺肺气肿的手术和支气管镜肺功能改善术。
Eur Respir Rev. 2023 Dec 20;32(170). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0004-2023. Print 2023 Dec 31.
6
Safety and Considerations of the Anaesthetic Management during Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Treatments.支气管镜肺减容术麻醉管理的安全性及注意事项。
Respiration. 2023;102(1):55-63. doi: 10.1159/000528044. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
7
Position statement on endoscopic lung volume reduction in South Africa: 2022 update.南非内镜下肺减容术立场声明:2022年更新版
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2022 Jun 20;28(2). doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2022.v28i2.249. eCollection 2022.
8
Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment for Severe Emphysema: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data.支气管镜肺减容线圈治疗严重肺气肿:个体参与者数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Respiration. 2022;101(7):697-705. doi: 10.1159/000524148. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
9
Effect of Endobronchial Coils on Exercise Tolerance and Lung Functions in Patients with Severe Emphysema - A Retrospective Cohort Study of 48 Patients.经支气管线圈置入术对重度肺气肿患者运动耐量和肺功能的影响:48 例患者的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Oct 8;16:2809-2815. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S327048. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Selection for Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction.支气管镜肺减容术的患者选择。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Apr 23;15:871-881. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S240848. eCollection 2020.
2
Endobronchial coils for emphysema: Dual mechanism of action on lobar residual volume reduction.支气管腔内线圈治疗肺气肿:减少肺叶残气量的双重作用机制。
Respirology. 2020 Nov;25(11):1160-1166. doi: 10.1111/resp.13816. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
3
Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Study of the PneumRx Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema (ELEVATE).随机对照研究方案:PneumRx 支气管内线圈系统与标准医疗管理治疗严重肺气肿患者的对照(ELEVATE)。
Respiration. 2019;98(6):512-520. doi: 10.1159/000502100. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
4
Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: An Expert Panel Recommendation - Update 2019.支气管镜肺减容术:专家小组建议-2019 年更新
Respiration. 2019;97(6):548-557. doi: 10.1159/000496122. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
5
Predictors of Response to Endobronchial Coil Therapy in Patients With Advanced Emphysema.预测晚期肺气肿患者对支气管内线圈治疗反应的因素。
Chest. 2019 May;155(5):928-937. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.02.012. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
6
Adoption Patterns of Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction Procedures in Germany and Predicted Procedure Volumes for Other European Countries.德国支气管镜肺减容术的采用模式和其他欧洲国家的预测手术量。
Respiration. 2019;97(1):34-41. doi: 10.1159/000491677. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
7
Effect of Endobronchial Coils vs Usual Care on Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Severe Emphysema: The RENEW Randomized Clinical Trial.经支气管镜线圈置入与常规治疗对重度肺气肿患者运动耐量的影响:RENEW 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016;315(20):2178-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6261.
8
Lung Volume Reduction Coil Treatment vs Usual Care in Patients With Severe Emphysema: The REVOLENS Randomized Clinical Trial.肺减容线圈治疗与常规治疗对重度肺气肿患者的影响:REVOLENS 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jan 12;315(2):175-84. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.17821.
9
The minimal important difference for the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with severe COPD.严重 COPD 患者圣乔治呼吸问卷的最小重要差异。
Eur Respir J. 2015 Dec;46(6):1598-604. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00535-2015. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
10
Bronchoscopic Coil Treatment for Patients with Severe Emphysema: A Meta-Analysis.重度肺气肿患者的支气管镜线圈治疗:一项荟萃分析
Respiration. 2015;90(2):136-45. doi: 10.1159/000431384. Epub 2015 Jun 25.