Sephien Andrew, Ghobrial Mike, Reljic Tea, Prida Xavier, Nerella Nishant, Kumar Ambuj
Department of Internal Medicine, HCA Healthcare/USF Morsani GME Consortium: HCA Florida Citrus Hospital, Inverness, FL, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florida-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 15;377:79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.11.052. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to have benefit in patients with heart failure (HF). Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRs and MAs) of randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing SGLT2i to placebo have been performed. However, there is uncertainty in the quality of the evidence and associated efficacy. We performed an overview of SRs and MAs of RCTs to summarize the evidence related to the efficacy of SGLT2i for the management of HF.
A comprehensive search of three databases (the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and PubMed) was conducted until February 21, 2021. All SRs of RCTs evaluating the efficacy of SGLT2i in patients with HF were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Methodological quality was evaluated using the AMSTAR-2 assessment tool. The overall quality of evidence was summarized using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. The initial search yielded 3431 references, of which, eight SRs and MAs met the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality ranged from critically low to high. The overall quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Most of the SRs and MAs showed benefits in all-cause mortality, HF-related hospitalizations, and KCCQ score change.
SGLT2i are possibly beneficial in patients with HF, however, none of the SRs and MAs compared the efficacy between different types of SGLT2i. Furthermore, this paper emphasizes the need for consistent reproducible conduct and reporting of SRs to generate high-quality evidence and facilitate clinical decision-making.
钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2i)已被证明对心力衰竭(HF)患者有益。已开展了多项比较SGLT2i与安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析(SRs和MAs)。然而,证据质量及相关疗效存在不确定性。我们对RCT的SRs和MAs进行了概述,以总结与SGLT2i治疗HF疗效相关的证据。
截至2021年2月21日,对三个数据库(Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE和PubMed)进行了全面检索。所有评估SGLT2i对HF患者疗效的RCT的SRs均符合纳入标准。主要结局为全因死亡率。使用AMSTAR-2评估工具评估方法学质量。采用推荐分级评估、制定和评价方法总结证据的总体质量。初步检索得到3431篇参考文献,其中8篇SRs和MAs符合纳入标准。方法学质量从极低到高不等。证据的总体质量从非常低到中等不等。大多数SRs和MAs显示在全因死亡率、HF相关住院率和堪萨斯城心肌病问卷(KCCQ)评分变化方面有获益。
SGLT2i可能对HF患者有益,然而,没有一项SRs和MAs比较不同类型SGLT2i之间的疗效。此外,本文强调需要以一致、可重复的方式开展和报告SRs,以产生高质量证据并促进临床决策。