• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达芬奇机器人辅助与传统胸腔镜支气管袖状肺叶切除术的效果比较。

Effect of da Vinci robot-assisted versus traditional thoracoscopic bronchial sleeve lobectomy.

机构信息

First Department of Thoracic Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.

Department of Respiratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2023 Oct;46(10):4191-4195. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.11.029. Epub 2022 Nov 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.11.029
PMID:36456441
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the short-term effect of Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) bronchial sleeve lobectomy, so as to summarize its safety and effectiveness.

METHODS

It was a retrospective single-center study with the inclusion of 22 cases receiving RATS lobectomy and 49 cases of traditional thoracoscopic surgery. Further comparison was performed focusing on the baseline characteristics and perioperative performance of the two groups.

RESULTS

Compared with the traditional thoracoscopic surgery group, RATS group had more advantages in the number of lymph nodes dissected (P = 0.003), shorter postoperative length of stay in the hospital (P = 0.040), shorter drainage time (P = 0.022), reduced drainage volume (P = 0.001). Moreover, this study found for the first time that there was a shortening in the operation of sleeve lobectomy by using Da Vinci robot-assisted surgical system (P = 0.001). The operation cost of RATS group is more expensive (96000 ± 9100.782 vs 63000 ± 5102.563 yuan; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the traditional thoracoscopic bronchial sleeve lobectomy, RATS lobectomy shows advantages of higher operating sensitivity, shorter operation time, faster postoperative recovery, and more lymph nodes dissected. Collectively, RATS bronchial sleeve lobectomy is safe and effective in operation.

摘要

目的

分析达芬奇机器人辅助胸腔镜(RATS)支气管袖状切除术的近期疗效,总结其安全性和有效性。

方法

回顾性单中心研究纳入 22 例行 RATS 肺叶切除术和 49 例行传统胸腔镜手术的患者。进一步比较两组患者的基线特征和围手术期表现。

结果

与传统胸腔镜手术组相比,RATS 组在淋巴结清扫数量(P=0.003)、术后住院时间(P=0.040)、引流时间(P=0.022)、引流量(P=0.001)方面更具优势。此外,本研究首次发现达芬奇机器人辅助手术系统可缩短袖状切除术的手术时间(P=0.001)。RATS 组的手术费用更昂贵(96000±9100.782 元比 63000±5102.563 元;P<0.001)。

结论

与传统的胸腔镜支气管袖状肺叶切除术相比,RATS 肺叶切除术具有操作敏感性更高、手术时间更短、术后恢复更快、淋巴结清扫更多的优势。总的来说,RATS 支气管袖状切除术在手术操作中是安全有效的。

相似文献

1
Effect of da Vinci robot-assisted versus traditional thoracoscopic bronchial sleeve lobectomy.达芬奇机器人辅助与传统胸腔镜支气管袖状肺叶切除术的效果比较。
Asian J Surg. 2023 Oct;46(10):4191-4195. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.11.029. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
2
[A Paired Case Controlled Study Comparing the Short-term Outcomes of Da Vinci RATS and VATS Approach for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].一项比较达芬奇机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)与传统胸腔镜手术(VATS)治疗非小细胞肺癌短期疗效的配对病例对照研究
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 20;21(3):206-211. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.03.18.
3
Effect of da Vinci robot versus thoracoscopic surgery on lung function and oxidative stress levels in NSCLC patients: a propensity score-matched study.达芬奇机器人手术与胸腔镜手术对非小细胞肺癌患者肺功能和氧化应激水平的影响:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):706-712. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10577-x. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) Compare with Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for Lung Lobectomy in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)与电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)用于非小细胞肺癌患者肺叶切除的疗效及安全性比较
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2019;22(3):169-178. doi: 10.2174/1386207322666190411113040.
5
Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with thoracotomy in bronchial sleeve lobectomy for centrally located non-small cell lung cancer.视频辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸手术治疗中央型非小细胞肺癌支气管袖状肺叶切除术的比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):403-413.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.01.105. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
6
A comparison of three-port and four-port Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: a retrospective study.三孔与四孔达芬奇机器人辅助胸腔镜肺癌根治术的比较:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jun 26;19(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02920-7.
7
[To Explore Clinical Value of Single-port Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery 
in Elderly Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Lobectomy, Segmentectomy 
and Lobectomy vs Segmentectomy].[探讨单孔电视胸腔镜手术在老年非小细胞肺癌患者中的临床价值:肺叶切除术、肺段切除术及肺叶切除术与肺段切除术的比较]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2018 Apr 20;21(4):287-295. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.04.11.
8
Comparison of Sleeve Lobectomy for Lung Cancer Using Mini-Thoracotomy and an Optimized Robot-Assisted Technique.经微型胸腔镜与改良机器人辅助技术行肺段切除术治疗肺癌的对比研究。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:15330338211051547. doi: 10.1177/15330338211051547.
9
Two-incision approach for video-assisted thoracoscopic sleeve lobectomy treating the central lung cancer.两切口入路电视辅助胸腔镜袖式肺叶切除术治疗中央型肺癌
Indian J Cancer. 2015 Feb;51 Suppl 2:e18-20. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.152001.
10
[Comparison of thoracoscopic anatomical partial-lobectomy and thoracoscopic lobectomy on the patients with pT1aN0M0 peripheral non-small cell lung cancer].[胸腔镜下解剖性肺段切除术与胸腔镜下肺叶切除术治疗pT1aN0M0期周围型非小细胞肺癌的疗效比较]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Oct 1;53(10):727-30.

引用本文的文献

1
Complex uniportal robotic-assisted sleeve resections under spontaneous ventilation and with double lumen intubation: a case series and a narrative review of the literature.自主通气下双腔气管插管的复杂单孔机器人辅助袖状切除术:病例系列及文献综述
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 31;14(8):3170-3182. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2025-498. Epub 2025 Aug 13.
2
Comparison of robot-assisted and video-assisted thoracic sleeve lobectomy in non-small cell lung cancer: insights from a high-volume center.机器人辅助与电视辅助胸腔袖式肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的比较:来自大型医疗中心的见解
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Apr 30;17(4):2174-2185. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1810. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
3
Single-center retrospective study on the clinical application of multi-arm robotic-assisted uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery.
多臂机器人辅助单孔胸腔镜手术临床应用的单中心回顾性研究
J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 16;19(1):117. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02256-x.
4
Cost-effectiveness and postoperative outcomes of spontaneous mechanical ventilation during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a retrospective study.电视辅助胸腔镜手术中自主机械通气的成本效益及术后结局:一项回顾性研究
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Oct 31;16(10):6888-6898. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-869. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
5
Robot-assisted minimally invasive bronchial resection with primary anastomosis for schwannoma arising from left main bronchus: a case report.机器人辅助微创支气管切除术并一期吻合治疗起源于左主支气管的神经鞘瘤:一例报告
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024 Mar 29;13(3):654-665. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-819. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
6
Analyzing robotic surgery impact on recovery quality & emotions.分析机器人手术对恢复质量和情绪的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 17;10(1):e23905. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23905. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.