• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在克罗恩病患者中,在首次抗 TNF 药物治疗失败后使用乌司奴单抗、维得利珠单抗或第二种抗 TNF 药物的疗效:一项多中心回顾性研究。

Efficacy of ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or a second anti-TNF agent after the failure of a first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease: a multicentre retrospective study.

机构信息

CHU Rennes, University Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France.

CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 1;22(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02583-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12876-022-02583-5
PMID:36457080
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9717550/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No study has performed a face-to-face comparison of biologics after the failure of the first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of biologics in this setting.

METHODS

Patients with CD who were refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, and treated with ustekinumab (UST), vedolizumab (VDZ), or a second anti-TNF drug as a second-line biological agent at 10 French tertiary centres from 2013 to 2019 were retrospectively included in this study.

RESULTS

Among the 203 patients included, 90 (44%) received UST, 42 (21%) received VDZ and 71 (35%) received a second anti-TNF agent. The first anti-TNF agent was discontinued due to a primary nonresponse in 42 (21%) patients. At weeks 14-24, the rates of steroid-free remission were similar between the UST, VDZ and second anti-TNF groups (29%, 38% and 44%, respectively, p = 0.15). With a mean follow-up of 118 weeks, drug survival was shorter for patients who received ustekinumab treatment (p = 0.001). In the case of trough level less than 5 µg/ml, patients treated with a second anti-TNF agent had a higher postinduction remission rate (p = 0.002), and drug survival (p = 0.0005). No other relevant factors were associated with treatment efficacy, including trough levels greater than 5 µg/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

VDZ, UST and a second anti-TNF agent exhibit similar efficacy in the short term, as second-biological line treatment in patients with CD who are refractory to a first anti-TNF agent, but shorter drug maintenance is observed for patients treated with UST.

摘要

背景

尚无研究对克罗恩病(CD)患者中首用抗 TNF 药物失败后的生物制剂进行面对面比较。本研究旨在比较该背景下生物制剂的疗效。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了 2013 年至 2019 年来自 10 家法国三级中心的难治性 CD 患者,这些患者在首用抗 TNF 药物后接受乌司奴单抗(UST)、维得利珠单抗(VDZ)或二线抗 TNF 药物作为二线生物制剂治疗。

结果

203 例患者中,90 例(44%)接受 UST,42 例(21%)接受 VDZ,71 例(35%)接受二线抗 TNF 药物。42 例(21%)患者因原发性无应答而停用首用 TNF 药物。在第 14-24 周,UST、VDZ 和二线抗 TNF 组的无激素缓解率相似(分别为 29%、38%和 44%,p=0.15)。中位随访 118 周时,UST 治疗患者的药物存活率更短(p=0.001)。在谷浓度<5μg/ml 的情况下,接受二线抗 TNF 药物治疗的患者诱导缓解后缓解率更高(p=0.002),药物存活率更高(p=0.0005)。其他与治疗效果相关的因素,包括谷浓度>5μg/ml,与疗效无关。

结论

在首用抗 TNF 药物失败的 CD 患者中,VDZ、UST 和二线抗 TNF 药物作为二线生物制剂短期疗效相似,但 UST 治疗患者的药物维持时间更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c57/9717550/d17585470f15/12876_2022_2583_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c57/9717550/cef047a95903/12876_2022_2583_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c57/9717550/015f69fddcd6/12876_2022_2583_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c57/9717550/e27e617e8115/12876_2022_2583_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c57/9717550/b5fd80421d22/12876_2022_2583_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c57/9717550/d17585470f15/12876_2022_2583_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c57/9717550/cef047a95903/12876_2022_2583_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c57/9717550/015f69fddcd6/12876_2022_2583_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c57/9717550/e27e617e8115/12876_2022_2583_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c57/9717550/b5fd80421d22/12876_2022_2583_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c57/9717550/d17585470f15/12876_2022_2583_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of ustekinumab, vedolizumab, or a second anti-TNF agent after the failure of a first anti-TNF agent in patients with Crohn's disease: a multicentre retrospective study.在克罗恩病患者中,在首次抗 TNF 药物治疗失败后使用乌司奴单抗、维得利珠单抗或第二种抗 TNF 药物的疗效:一项多中心回顾性研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 1;22(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12876-022-02583-5.
2
Endoscopic Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease After Curative Ileocecal Resection with Early Prophylaxis by Anti-TNF, Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab: A Real-World Multicentre European Study.抗 TNF、Vedolizumab 或 Ustekinumab 早期预防治疗后克罗恩病患者行回肠末端切除术的内镜术后复发:一项真实世界的多中心欧洲研究。
J Crohns Colitis. 2022 Dec 5;16(12):1882-1892. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac100.
3
Effectiveness of swapping to ustekinumab after vedolizumab failure in patients with multi-refractory Crohn's disease.维多珠单抗治疗失败后改用乌司奴单抗治疗多难治性克罗恩病患者的有效性
Dig Liver Dis. 2023 Feb;55(2):230-234. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.06.029. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
4
Ustekinumab is associated with superior treatment persistence but not with higher remission rates vedolizumab in patients with refractory Crohn's disease: results from a multicentre cohort study.在难治性克罗恩病患者中,优特克单抗与更高的治疗持续性相关,但与更高的缓解率无关:一项多中心队列研究的结果。(注:原文中“vedolizumab”前面表述有误,这里按正确理解翻译。完整准确句子应该是“Ustekinumab is associated with superior treatment persistence but not with higher remission rates compared with vedolizumab in patients with refractory Crohn's disease: results from a multicentre cohort study.” 即“在难治性克罗恩病患者中,与维多珠单抗相比,优特克单抗与更高的治疗持续性相关,但与更高的缓解率无关:一项多中心队列研究的结果。” )
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Dec 26;15:17562848221144349. doi: 10.1177/17562848221144349. eCollection 2022.
5
Prior Immunogenicity to Anti-TNF Biologics Is Not Associated with Increased Anti-drug Antibodies to Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab.先前对 TNF 拮抗剂的免疫原性与对维得利珠单抗或乌司奴单抗的抗药物抗体增加无关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jun;67(6):2480-2484. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07046-7. Epub 2021 May 21.
6
Real-world clinical outcomes and healthcare costs in patients with Crohn's disease treated with vedolizumab versus ustekinumab in the United States.在美国,使用维得利珠单抗与乌司奴单抗治疗克罗恩病患者的真实世界临床结局和医疗保健成本。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2024 May;40(5):877-885. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2326585. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Anti-TNF Agent as First-Line Biological Therapy in Luminal Crohn's Disease: A Retrospective Study From 2 Referral Centers.乌司奴单抗与抗 TNF 制剂作为肠病性克罗恩病一线生物治疗药物的疗效比较:来自 2 家转诊中心的回顾性研究。
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2023 Jun 1;29(6):923-931. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izac167.
8
The effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab as third-line biologic therapy in patients with Crohn's disease.优特克单抗和维多珠单抗作为克罗恩病患者三线生物治疗的有效性。
Dig Liver Dis. 2023 Apr;55(4):471-477. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
9
Comparison of Short- and Long-Term Effectiveness between Anti-TNF and Ustekinumab after Vedolizumab Failure as First-Line Therapy in Crohn's Disease: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.维多珠单抗作为克罗恩病一线治疗失败后抗TNF与优特克单抗的短期和长期疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 26;12(7):2503. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072503.
10
Comparative Effectiveness of Biologic Therapies in Preventing Penetrating Complications in Patients With Crohn's Disease.生物治疗预防克罗恩病患者穿透性并发症的比较效果。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Feb;22(2):377-385.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.08.017. Epub 2023 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Ustekinumab versus vedolizumab in patients with Crohn's disease refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.乌司奴单抗与维多珠单抗治疗对抗肿瘤坏死因子难治的克罗恩病患者的疗效比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):2110-2121. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.12141.
2
IFX Is Associated with Higher Rates of 2-Year Mucosal Healing in Biologic-Naïve CD Patients Compared to UST.与优特克单抗相比,英夫利昔单抗与初治克罗恩病患者两年黏膜愈合率较高相关。
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09226-1.
3
Persistence and Efficacy of Ustekinumab in Crohn's Disease After Anti-TNF Failure: An Observational Study.
优特克单抗在抗TNF治疗失败后对克罗恩病的持续疗效及有效性:一项观察性研究
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-08978-0.
4
Superior persistence of ustekinumab compared to anti-TNF in vedolizumab-experienced inflammatory bowel diseases patients: a real-world cohort study.与抗TNF药物相比,优特克单抗在接受维多珠单抗治疗的炎症性肠病患者中具有更高的持久性:一项真实世界队列研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 31;24(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03577-1.
5
Short-term effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in elderly and non-elderly patients with Crohn's disease: a comparative study.优特克单抗和维多珠单抗在老年及非老年克罗恩病患者中的短期有效性和安全性:一项对比研究。
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 19;17:17562848241299752. doi: 10.1177/17562848241299752. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparative real-world outcomes between ustekinumab, infliximab, and adalimumab in bio-naïve and bio-experienced Crohn's disease patients: a retrospective multicenter study.在生物初治和生物经验丰富的克罗恩病患者中,乌司奴单抗、英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗的真实世界疗效比较:一项回顾性多中心研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03403-8.
7
IBD Patients with Primary or Secondary Nonresponse to Ustekinumab Benefit from Dose Escalation or Reinduction.对乌司奴单抗原发性或继发性无反应的炎症性肠病患者可从剂量递增或再诱导中获益。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 9;13(14):3993. doi: 10.3390/jcm13143993.
8
Therapeutic sequencing in inflammatory bowel disease: Determining the optimal position of vedolizumab for long-term Crohn's disease control using real-world evidence.炎症性肠病的治疗序贯策略:利用真实世界证据确定vedolizumab 在长期克罗恩病控制中的最佳位置。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2024 Jun;12(5):574-584. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12563. Epub 2024 May 8.
9
Ustekinumab or Vedolizumab after Failure of Anti-TNF Agents in Crohn's Disease: A Review of Comparative Effectiveness Studies.抗TNF药物治疗克罗恩病失败后使用优特克单抗或维多珠单抗:比较有效性研究综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 10;13(8):2187. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082187.
10
Effectiveness of vedolizumab and ustekinumab as second biologic agent in achieving target outcomes in tumor necrosis factor antagonists experienced patients with inflammatory bowel disease (enroll-ex study).维多珠单抗和优特克单抗作为第二种生物制剂在肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂治疗失败的炎症性肠病患者中实现目标结局的有效性(ENROLL-EX研究)
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Oct 9;14:1243080. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1243080. eCollection 2023.