Clinical effectiveness of buccally and palatally anchored maxillary molar distalization: The miniscrew-supported 3-dimensional maxillary bimetric distalizing arch vs the Beneslider.

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the dentoalveolar and skeletal changes achieved with a novel miniscrew-supported 3-dimensional maxillary bimetric distalizing arch (3D-MBDA) and the Beneslider. In addition, the study aimed to compare these changes between each other and with an untreated control group.

METHODS

Sixty-five patients with bilateral Class II molar relationship and fully-erupted maxillary second molars were included in the study. Of these patients, 23 received the miniscrew-supported 3D-MBDA (group 1), 21 received the Beneslider (group 2), and 21 served as untreated control subjects (group 3). Lateral cephalometric films and dental casts, taken at the beginning and the end of maxillary molar distalization, were analyzed to study the differences between the groups.

RESULTS

The crown distalization of the first molars was similar between the treatment groups (group 1, 3.1 mm; group 2, 3.3 mm); however, root distalization was significantly more in group 1 (5 mm) when compared with group 2 (1.7 mm). The first molars tipped 6.2° in the mesial direction in group 1 and 8.2° in the distal direction in group 2. The mesiobuccal cusp tip of the first molars extruded for 1.2 mm and increased vertical dimensions in group 2, whereas it intruded for 1.7 mm in group 1. Meanwhile, aforementioned parameters presented insignificant changes throughout the observation period in the control group. Inter-first molar width increased significantly in group 2 (2.7 mm). Distalization time was similar between the groups (group 1, 14 months; group 2, 15 months). The distalization rate was higher in group 2 (0.27 mm/mo) than in group 1 (0.23 mm/mo) measured from the crowns; however, it was similar between the groups (group 1, 0.25 mm/mo; group 2, 0.19 mm/mo) when measured from the trifurcation point.

CONCLUSIONS

The miniscrew-supported 3D-MBDA was more effective in distalizing molar roots and maintaining vertical parameters and dental arch width while tipping the molars mesially. In contrast, the Beneslider distalized molar crowns faster, resulting in significant distal tipping.