Correro Anthony N, Hinrichs Kate L M, Krishnan Mira C, Cottingham Maria Easter, Trittschuh Emily H, Parmenter Brett A, Kang Jinkyung, Stelmokas Julija
Mental Health Service, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Clin Neuropsychol. 2025 Apr;39(3):543-585. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2022.2148379. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
: We sought to describe the LGBTQ + related education, training, and clinical practice of independently licensed neuropsychologists in the United States and to identify factors that predict affirmative neuropsychological practices. We hypothesized that LGBTQ + identity, female gender, more recent training, and extent of LGBTQ + education/training would predict use of LGBTQ + practice guidelines. : A workgroup of clinical psychologists with experience in LGBTQ + psychology and neuropsychology developed a survey to identify personal and professional factors that predict affirmative neuropsychological testing practices. The survey was distributed through professional organizations and listservs between August and September 2021 with 118 responses meeting inclusionary criteria. : The majority of participants identified as heterosexual (70.3%) and cisgender (97.5%), and most (48-63%) received LGBTQ + training post-licensure. Between 19% and 32% of participants reported never completing LGBTQ + specific education. Consistent with our hypotheses, factors predicting affirmative clinical practice behaviors were LGBTQ + education/training, and personal background (sexual minority status, female/feminine gender, and years since degree). Other significant factors included prior experience with LGBTQ + patients and primary patient population (child vs. adult). Qualitative responses indicated varying values, attitudes, and knowledge regarding collection of LGBTQ + information and modification of clinical practice. : Neuropsychologists underutilize affirming practices as evidenced by low rates of querying pronouns, knowing whether LGBTQ + health information is available at their institutions, and adjusting evaluation and feedback approaches. We provide specific training and education recommendations to increase knowledge and skills and to address beliefs about LGBTQ + health that can serve to promote affirmative neuropsychological practice.
我们试图描述美国独立执业的神经心理学家与 LGBTQ + 相关的教育、培训和临床实践,并确定预测积极神经心理学实践的因素。我们假设 LGBTQ + 身份、女性性别、更近的培训以及 LGBTQ + 教育/培训的程度将预测 LGBTQ + 实践指南的使用情况。
一个在 LGBTQ + 心理学和神经心理学方面有经验的临床心理学家工作小组开发了一项调查,以确定预测积极神经心理学测试实践的个人和专业因素。该调查于2021年8月至9月通过专业组织和邮件列表进行分发,共有118份回复符合纳入标准。
大多数参与者认定为异性恋(70.3%)和顺性别者(97.5%),并且大多数人(48 - 63%)在获得执照后接受过LGBTQ + 培训。19%至32%的参与者报告从未完成过LGBTQ + 专项教育。与我们的假设一致,预测积极临床实践行为的因素是LGBTQ + 教育/培训以及个人背景(性少数群体身份、女性/女性气质性别以及获得学位后的年数)。其他重要因素包括此前与LGBTQ + 患者的接触经历以及主要患者群体(儿童与成人)。定性回复表明,在收集LGBTQ + 信息和调整临床实践方面存在不同的价值观、态度和知识。
神经心理学家对肯定性实践的利用不足,这体现在询问代词的比例较低、不知道其所在机构是否有LGBTQ + 健康信息以及调整评估和反馈方法等方面。我们提供了具体的培训和教育建议,以增加知识和技能,并解决有关LGBTQ + 健康的观念问题,从而促进积极的神经心理学实践。