IRISSO, UMR CNRS-INRAE 7170-1427, Paris-Dauphine University, PSL, Paris, France.
Laboratory for Interdisciplinary Evaluation of Public Policies (LIEPP), Sciences Po,Paris, France.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2023 Aug 1;62(8):2707-2715. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac675.
Develop and validate a thorough exposure questionnaire to comprehensively explore crystalline silica (SiO2) exposure in the general population (gender-specific, occupational and non-occupational) and in patients with autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic sclerosis (SSc)).
Lifetime exposures to SiO2 in occupational and non-occupational settings were assessed using a thorough exposure questionnaire. The questionnaire was applied to a general population panel (n = 2911) sampled from the French rolling census, and to unselected patients with SSc (n = 100) and RA (n = 97). Global (GES), occupational (OES) and non-occupational (NOES) exposure scores were assessed in SSc and RA patients, and compared with up to four controls from the general population, matched by age group, sex and tobacco consumption.
Patients had higher GES than their matched controls (SSc: P = 0.001; RA: P < 0.0001) due to higher OES (P < 0.0001 for SSc and RA). Men had higher GES than women (SSc: P < 0.0001; RA: P = 0.002) due to higher OES (P < 0.0001 for SSc and RA). The NOES did not differ between men and women. In SSc patients: Men had higher GES than controls (P < 0.0001). Men and women with SSc had higher OES than controls (P < 0.0001). In RA patients: GES and OES were higher in both men (P = 0.00521; P < 0.0001) and women (P < 0.0001; P < 0.0001) than in their respective controls. Women had higher NOES than controls (P = 0.045).
The lifetime SiO2 exposure gap between RA and SSc patients and controls was substantially due to occupational exposure. In both diseases, men had higher exposure scores than women.
开发和验证一份全面的暴露问卷,以全面探讨普通人群(按性别、职业和非职业划分)和自身免疫性疾病患者(类风湿关节炎(RA)、系统性硬皮病(SSc))中的结晶二氧化硅(SiO2)暴露情况。
使用全面的暴露问卷评估职业和非职业环境中的终生 SiO2 暴露情况。该问卷应用于从法国滚动普查中抽取的普通人群样本(n=2911)和未经选择的 SSc(n=100)和 RA(n=97)患者。评估 SSc 和 RA 患者的总体(GES)、职业(OES)和非职业(NOES)暴露评分,并与年龄组、性别和吸烟状况相匹配的最多四名普通人群对照进行比较。
由于职业暴露更高(SSc:P<0.0001;RA:P<0.0001),患者的 GES 高于其匹配的对照组(SSc:P=0.001;RA:P<0.0001)。男性的 GES 高于女性(SSc:P<0.0001;RA:P=0.002),原因是职业暴露更高(SSc 和 RA:均 P<0.0001)。男性和女性的 NOES 没有差异。在 SSc 患者中:男性的 GES 高于对照组(P<0.0001)。男性和女性 SSc 患者的 OES 高于对照组(P<0.0001)。在 RA 患者中:男性(P=0.00521;P<0.0001)和女性(P<0.0001;P<0.0001)的 GES 和 OES 均高于各自的对照组。女性的 NOES 高于对照组(P=0.045)。
RA 和 SSc 患者与对照组之间终生 SiO2 暴露差距主要归因于职业暴露。在这两种疾病中,男性的暴露评分均高于女性。