Suppr超能文献

噪声环境下人工耳蜗植入使用者与未保留残余听力者言语神经编码差异。

Differences in neural encoding of speech in noise between cochlear implant users with and without preserved acoustic hearing.

机构信息

Dept. Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, United States.

Dept. Communication Sciences and Disorders, Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ 07043, United States.

出版信息

Hear Res. 2023 Jan;427:108649. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108649. Epub 2022 Nov 13.

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) have evolved to combine residual acoustic hearing with electric hearing. It has been expected that CI users with residual acoustic hearing experience better speech-in-noise perception than CI-only listeners because preserved acoustic cues aid unmasking speech from background noise. This study sought neural substrate of better speech unmasking in CI users with preserved acoustic hearing compared to those with lower degree of acoustic hearing. Cortical evoked responses to speech in multi-talker babble noise were compared between 29 Hybrid (i.e., electric acoustic stimulation or EAS) and 29 electric-only CI users. The amplitude ratio of evoked responses to speech and noise, or internal SNR, was significantly larger in the CI users with EAS. This result indicates that CI users with better residual acoustic hearing exhibit enhanced unmasking of speech from background noise.

摘要

人工耳蜗(CIs)已经发展到将残余的声音与电刺激相结合。人们一直期望具有残余听力的人工耳蜗使用者比仅使用人工耳蜗的使用者具有更好的噪声下言语感知能力,因为保留的声学线索有助于从背景噪声中掩蔽言语。本研究旨在探索具有残余听力的人工耳蜗使用者与听力较低的人工耳蜗使用者相比,在更好的言语掩蔽方面的神经基础。在多说话者背景噪声中,对 29 名混合(即电声刺激或 EAS)和 29 名纯电人工耳蜗使用者的言语皮质诱发电位进行了比较。EAS 组人工耳蜗使用者对言语和噪声的诱发电位幅度比(即内部信噪比)显著增大。这一结果表明,具有较好残余听力的人工耳蜗使用者在从背景噪声中掩蔽言语方面表现出更强的能力。

相似文献

1
2
Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Hear Res. 2017 Jul;350:226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 11.
4
Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
Hear Res. 2018 Sep;367:223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
Ear Hear. 2022 Mar/Apr;43(2):631-645. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001121.
6
Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
Ear Hear. 2017 Sep/Oct;38(5):554-567. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000420.
8
Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
Hear Res. 2020 May;390:107929. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107929. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Neural Correlates of Individual Differences in Speech-in-Noise Performance in a Large Cohort of Cochlear Implant Users.
Ear Hear. 2023;44(5):1107-1120. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001357. Epub 2023 May 5.
4
The Acoustic Change Complex in Response to Frequency Changes and Its Correlation to Cochlear Implant Speech Outcomes.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Oct 21;15:757254. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.757254. eCollection 2021.
5
Pre- and post-target cortical processes predict speech-in-noise performance.
Neuroimage. 2021 Mar;228:117699. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117699. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
6
Speech-in-noise detection is related to auditory working memory precision for frequency.
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 19;10(1):13997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70952-9.
8
Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users.
Ear Hear. 2020 Jul/Aug;41(4):868-882. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000807.
9
Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
Hear Res. 2018 Sep;367:223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.06.016. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
Evidence of a speech evoked electrophysiological release from masking in noise.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Aug;142(2):EL218. doi: 10.1121/1.4998151.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验