Suppr超能文献

中国人如何看待“躺平”与努力奋斗:回报预期的调节作用。

How do Chinese people evaluate "Tang-Ping" (lying flat) and effort-making: The moderation effect of return expectation.

作者信息

Hsu Han-Yu

机构信息

School of Social Development, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 16;13:871439. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871439. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

"Tang-Ping" (TP), referring to "lying flat" literally, has been a buzzword in China web media since 2021. As the opponent of effort-making (EM) behaviors which have both instrumental and purpose values in Confucian culture, TP has a negative moral implication in China and has been criticized by the state-owned media. Meanwhile, the meaning of TP also contains a negative form of resistance toward social and organizational inequality, which may be acceptable under unfair circumstances. This study employed the imagined-scenario method to investigate the public's moral evaluations of TP and EM behaviors under conditions of different return expectations. An online questionnaire with 2 (TP vs. EM) by 2 (low vs. high return expectation) between-participants designed scenarios were employed, along with the measurements of obligation belief of effort (OBE) and improvement belief of effort (IBE) scales ( = 210). The results found that (1) TP behaviors were evaluated as morally wrong in general, while EM behaviors were morally right; (2) the return expectation of the scenario moderated the behavior type's effect on moral evaluation, that EM behaviors were evaluated positively regardless of return expectation, while TP behaviors became acceptable with a neutral score under the low return expectation; (3) both OBE and IBE correlated positively with evaluations of EM while negatively with evaluations of TP. The theoretical and practical implications were discussed.

摘要

“躺平”(TP),字面意思是“平躺”,自2021年以来一直是中国网络媒体上的一个流行语。作为儒家文化中具有工具性和目的性价值的努力行为(EM)的对立面,“躺平”在中国具有负面的道德含义,并受到了国有媒体的批评。同时,“躺平”的含义还包含对社会和组织不平等的一种消极形式的抵抗,在不公平的情况下可能是可以接受的。本研究采用想象情景法,调查了在不同回报预期条件下公众对“躺平”和努力行为的道德评价。采用了一个在线问卷,其中包括2(“躺平”与努力行为)×2(低回报预期与高回报预期)的组间设计情景,同时测量了努力义务信念(OBE)和努力改善信念(IBE)量表(N = 210)。结果发现:(1)总体而言,“躺平”行为被评价为道德错误,而努力行为在道德上是正确的;(2)情景的回报预期调节了行为类型对道德评价的影响,即无论回报预期如何,努力行为都得到积极评价,而在低回报预期下,“躺平”行为以中性分数变得可以接受;(3)努力义务信念和努力改善信念与对努力行为的评价呈正相关,与对“躺平”行为的评价呈负相关。讨论了其理论和实践意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4498/9709313/c87d191073bb/fpsyg-13-871439-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验