Suppr超能文献

巴西医疗中心 1 型糖尿病患者的瞬态血糖监测系统:一项短期前瞻性研究的真实世界数据。

Flash glucose monitoring system in patients with type 1 diabetes in healthcare center in Brazil: real world data from a short-term prospective study.

机构信息

Departamento de Clínica Médica, Unidade de Diabetes, Hospital Universitário do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil,

Departamento de Clínica Médica, Unidade de Diabetes, Hospital Universitário do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

出版信息

Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Mar 30;67(3):289-297. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000540. Epub 2022 Dec 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the alternate use of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) with self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG), in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two weeks of open FGM (P2), both preceded (P1) and followed by 2 weeks (P3) of SMBG with a blinded FGM system. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was calculated by (|FGMi - SMBGi|) / SMBGi, where it was a paired data sample.

RESULTS

In total, 34 patients were evaluated. Time in range (TIR) did not change between P1 and P2. In 12 patients (35.3%), TIR increased from 40% at P1 to 52% at P2 ( = 0.002) and in 22 (64.7%), TIR decreased or did not change. FGM use resulted in decreased % time spent in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) (6.5% 5.0%; = 0.005), increased % time spent in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL) (44.5% to 51%; = 0.046) with no significant change in % TIR. The proportion of patients who reached sensor-estimated glycated hemoglobin (eA1c) < 7% decreased from 23.5% at P1 to 12.9% at P2, = 0.028. For the whole sample, the MARD between the two methods was 15.5% (95% CI 14.5-16.6%). For normal glucose range, hyperglycemic levels and hypoglycemic levels MARD were 16.0% (95% CI 15.0-17.0%), 13.3% (95% CI 11.5-15.2%) and 23.4% [95% CI 20.5-26.3%)], respectively.

CONCLUSION

FGM after usual SMBG decreased the % time spent in hypoglycemia concomitant with an undesired increase in % time spent in hyperglycemia. Lower accuracy of FGM regarding hypoglycemia levels could result in overcorrection of hypoglycemia.

摘要

目的

评估在 1 型糖尿病(T1D)患者中交替使用即时血糖监测(FGM)与自我血糖监测(SMBG)。

材料与方法

为期两周的开放式 FGM(P2),在此之前(P1)和之后均使用盲法 FGM 系统进行两周 SMBG(P3)。平均绝对相对差异(MARD)通过(|FGMi-SMBGi|)/SMBGi 计算,其中它是一个配对数据样本。

结果

共评估了 34 名患者。在 P1 和 P2 之间,时间在目标范围内(TIR)没有变化。在 12 名患者(35.3%)中,TIR 从 P1 的 40%增加到 P2 的 52%(=0.002),而在 22 名患者(64.7%)中,TIR 减少或没有变化。FGM 的使用导致低血糖时间(<70mg/dL)百分比降低(6.5%降至 5.0%;=0.005),高血糖时间(>180mg/dL)百分比增加(44.5%升至 51%;=0.046),但 TIR 百分比无显著变化。达到传感器估计糖化血红蛋白(eA1c)<7%的患者比例从 P1 的 23.5%降至 P2 的 12.9%,=0.028。对于整个样本,两种方法之间的 MARD 为 15.5%(95%CI 14.5-16.6%)。对于正常血糖范围、高血糖水平和低血糖水平,MARD 分别为 16.0%(95%CI 15.0-17.0%)、13.3%(95%CI 11.5-15.2%)和 23.4%(95%CI 20.5-26.3%)。

结论

在常规 SMBG 之后使用 FGM 会降低低血糖时间的百分比,同时伴随不期望的高血糖时间百分比增加。FGM 在低血糖水平的准确性较低可能导致低血糖过度纠正。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验