Suppr超能文献

在163129项随机对照试验中发现了可疑研究行为的指标。

Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Damen Johanna A, Heus Pauline, Lamberink Herm J, Tijdink Joeri K, Bouter Lex, Glasziou Paul, Moher David, Otte Willem M, Vinkers Christiaan H, Hooft Lotty

机构信息

Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Feb;154:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.11.020. Epub 2022 Dec 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore indicators of the following questionable research practices (QRPs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs): (1) risk of bias in four domains (random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, and blinding of outcome assessment); (2) modifications in primary outcomes that were registered in trial registration records (proxy for selective reporting bias); (3) ratio of the achieved to planned sample sizes; and (4) statistical discrepancy.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

Full texts of all human RCTs published in PubMed in 1996-2017 were automatically identified and information was collected automatically. Potential indicators of QRPs included author-specific, publication-specific, and journal-specific characteristics. Beta, logistic, and linear regression models were used to identify associations between these potential indicators and QRPs.

RESULTS

We included 163,129 RCT publications. The median probability of bias assessed using Robot Reviewer software ranged between 43% and 63% for the four risk of bias domains. A more recent publication year, trial registration, mentioning of CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials-checklist, and a higher journal impact factor were consistently associated with a lower risk of QRPs.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive analysis provides an insight into indicators of QRPs. Researchers should be aware that certain characteristics of the author team and publication are associated with a higher risk of QRPs.

摘要

目的

探讨随机对照试验(RCT)中以下可疑研究行为(QRP)的指标:(1)四个领域的偏倚风险(随机序列生成、分配隐藏、参与者和人员的盲法以及结果评估的盲法);(2)对试验注册记录中登记的主要结局的修改(选择性报告偏倚的代理指标);(3)实际样本量与计划样本量的比例;(4)统计差异。

研究设计与背景

自动识别1996 - 2017年发表于PubMed的所有人类RCT全文,并自动收集信息。QRP的潜在指标包括作者特定、发表特定和期刊特定特征。使用贝塔、逻辑和线性回归模型来识别这些潜在指标与QRP之间的关联。

结果

我们纳入了163,129篇RCT出版物。使用机器人评审软件评估的四个偏倚风险领域的偏倚中位数概率在43%至63%之间。更近的发表年份、试验注册、提及《报告试验的统一标准》清单以及更高的期刊影响因子始终与较低的QRP风险相关。

结论

这项综合分析提供了对QRP指标的见解。研究人员应意识到作者团队和发表的某些特征与较高的QRP风险相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验