King's College London, London, UK.
Groundswell, London, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e6622-e6630. doi: 10.1111/hsc.14111. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
Legal problems can be cause and consequence of ill-health and homelessness, necessitating efforts to integrate responses to these challenges. How to respond to legal issues within the context of health services for people who are homeless is though unclear. Groundswell piloted providing legal support to peer advocates (who have current or past experience of homelessness) and clients currently homeless in addition to their health-focused work. A participatory action-research design evaluated the emerging programme. Groundswell staff, both researchers and those involved in service delivery, co-led the research alongside an external researcher. Qualitative methods were used to understand the experiences of legal support. We interviewed peer advocates and volunteers (n = 8), Groundswell clients (n = 3) and sector stakeholders (n = 3). Interviews were linked to regular reflective recorded meetings (n = 7) where Groundswell staff and researchers discussed the programme and the evaluation. Data were analysed thematically. The findings focus on three themes. First, peer advocates' and clients' legal needs involve an experience of being overwhelmed by system complexity. Second, the legal support to peer advocates aided in brokering and signposting to other legal support, in the context of a supportive organisational culture. Third, support to clients can be effective, although the complexity of legal need undermines potential for sustainable responses. In conclusion, legal support for peer advocates should be developed by Groundswell and considered by other similar agencies. Legal support to people who are currently street homeless requires significant resources and so health-focused third-sector organisations maybe unable to offer effective support. Other modes of integration should be pursued. Findings also have implications for how the third sector relates to the government agencies implicated in the legal challenges facing people who are homeless.
法律问题可能是健康状况不佳和无家可归的原因和后果,因此需要努力整合应对这些挑战的措施。然而,在为无家可归者提供卫生服务的背景下,如何应对法律问题尚不清楚。Groundswell 试点项目在为同行顾问(目前或过去有过无家可归经历)和目前无家可归的客户提供法律支持,除了他们的以健康为重点的工作之外。一项参与式行动研究设计评估了这一新兴项目。Groundswell 的工作人员,包括研究人员和参与服务提供的人员,与外部研究人员一起共同领导研究。采用定性方法来了解法律支持的经验。我们采访了同行顾问和志愿者(n=8)、Groundswell 的客户(n=3)和部门利益相关者(n=3)。采访与定期的反思记录会议(n=7)相关联,在这些会议上,Groundswell 的工作人员和研究人员讨论了该计划和评估。对数据进行了主题分析。研究结果集中在三个主题上。首先,同行顾问和客户的法律需求涉及对系统复杂性的压倒性体验。其次,对同行顾问的法律支持有助于在支持性组织文化背景下进行中介和转介到其他法律支持。第三,对客户的支持可能是有效的,尽管法律需求的复杂性破坏了可持续响应的潜力。总之,Groundswell 应该为同行顾问开发法律支持,并由其他类似机构考虑。对目前街头无家可归者的法律支持需要大量资源,因此以健康为重点的第三部门组织可能无法提供有效的支持。应寻求其他整合模式。研究结果还对第三部门与参与无家可归者面临的法律挑战的政府机构之间的关系产生影响。