Department of Somnology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Japan Somnology Center, Institute of Neuropsychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2023 Mar 1;19(3):519-528. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10378.
Patients with chronic insomnia may respond differently to therapeutic modalities. This study examined differences in response of individuals with 2 insomnia phenotypes-short sleep duration (I-SSD; < 6 hours) and normal sleep duration (I-NSD; ≥ 6 hours) determined by polysomnography-to treatment with lemborexant and zolpidem tartrate extended-release 6.25 mg (zolpidem ER), compared with placebo.
Study E2006-G000-304 (Study 304; SUNRISE-1; NCT02783729) was a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo, and active comparator-controlled, parallel-group study comparing lemborexant 5 and 10 mg in individuals aged ≥ 55 years with insomnia disorder. In this analysis, changes in subjective (self-reported) variables based on sleep diaries and objective variables based on polysomnographs were assessed after 1-month administration of study drugs. Data from participants with I-SSD and I-NSD were compared.
In the I-SSD subgroup, both lemborexant doses provided significant benefit for sleep-onset latency (SOL), total sleep time (TST), and wake after sleep onset (WASO) vs placebo; zolpidem ER also provided significant benefit for TST and WASO, but not SOL, on both measures vs placebo. In the I-NSD subgroup, lemborexant and zolpidem ER provided significant benefit for TST and WASO vs placebo objectively but not subjectively; both doses of lemborexant provided significant benefit for SOL vs placebo subjectively, but not objectively.
Both drugs, but lemborexant more consistently, showed subjective and objective benefits compared with placebo in participants with insomnia with objective short sleep duration. However, neither lemborexant nor zolpidem provided consistent benefits for participants with normal sleep duration on sleep-onset and sleep maintenance variables.
Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Lemborexant in Subjects 55 Years and Older With Insomnia Disorder (SUNRISE 1); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02783729; Identifier: NCT02783729.
Inoue Y, Nishida M, Kubota N, et al. Comparison of the treatment effectiveness between lemborexant and zolpidem tartrate extended-release for insomnia disorder subtypes defined based on polysomnographic findings. . 2023;19(3):519-528.
慢性失眠患者对治疗方法的反应可能不同。本研究通过多导睡眠图检查,比较了两种失眠表型(短睡眠持续时间(I-SSD;<6 小时)和正常睡眠持续时间(I-NSD;≥6 小时))的个体对仑贝格佐匹克隆和唑吡坦 tartrate 延长释放 6.25mg(唑吡坦 ER)治疗的反应差异,与安慰剂相比。
研究 E2006-G000-304(研究 304;SUNRISE-1;NCT02783729)是一项全球性、随机、双盲、安慰剂和阳性对照对照、平行组研究,比较了仑贝格佐匹克隆 5mg 和 10mg 在年龄≥55 岁的失眠障碍患者中的疗效。在这项分析中,在服用研究药物 1 个月后,根据睡眠日记评估主观(自我报告)变量和基于多导睡眠图的客观变量的变化。比较了 I-SSD 和 I-NSD 患者的数据。
在 I-SSD 亚组中,仑贝格佐匹克隆两种剂量均显著改善睡眠潜伏期(SOL)、总睡眠时间(TST)和睡眠后觉醒时间(WASO),与安慰剂相比;唑吡坦 ER 也显著改善 TST 和 WASO,但与安慰剂相比,SOL 无显著改善。在 I-NSD 亚组中,仑贝格佐匹克隆和唑吡坦 ER 在客观和主观上均显著改善 TST 和 WASO,但在主观上无显著改善;仑贝格佐匹克隆两种剂量在主观上均显著改善 SOL,而客观上无显著改善。
与安慰剂相比,两种药物,尤其是仑贝格佐匹克隆,在客观上有睡眠持续时间较短的失眠患者中显示出主观和客观的益处。然而,仑贝格佐匹克隆和唑吡坦 ER 均未在睡眠起始和睡眠维持变量上对正常睡眠持续时间的患者提供一致的益处。
注册处:ClinicalTrials.gov;名称:仑贝格佐匹克隆治疗 55 岁及以上失眠障碍患者的疗效和安全性研究(SUNRISE 1);网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT02783729;标识符:NCT02783729。
Inoue Y, Nishida M, Kubota N, et al. Comparison of the treatment effectiveness between lemborexant and zolpidem tartrate extended-release for insomnia disorder subtypes defined based on polysomnographic findings.. 2023;19(3):519-528.