Big Health Ltd, London, UK.
CIRUS, Centre for Sleep and Chronobiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 27;8(1):6664. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25033-3.
In this retrospective cohort study, we describe acceptability, tolerability and potential efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in Insomnia Disorder subtypes, derived from polysomnography (PSG): insomnia with normal-sleep duration (I-NSD) and insomnia with short-sleep duration (I-SSD). All research volunteers were offered access to digital CBT, single component sleep restriction therapy and face-to-face group CBT. Follow-up occurred at three months post-treatment using the insomnia severity index (ISI). 96 participants (61 females, mean age of 41 years) were grouped into either normal-sleep (n = 53) or short-sleep (n = 43). CBT was acceptable to 63% of participants (normal-sleep = 31, short-sleep = 29), with 28 completing therapy (tolerability: normal-sleep = 11, short-sleep = 17). For potential efficacy, 39 (normal-sleep = 20, short-sleep = 19) out of 96 participants (41%) completed a follow-up ISI assessment. In this reduced sample, mean (SD) ISI scores decreased across both groups (normal-sleep: 18.0 (4.0) to 10.7 (4.6); short-sleep: 16.5 (5.5) to 11.0 (6.3); both P < 0.01). Those with normal-sleep were more likely to respond (≥6-point ISI reduction) to CBT compared to short-sleep (70%, n = 14/20 vs. 37%, n = 7/19 respectively, P = 0.038). In this cohort, 60 (63%) of participants attempted CBT and of those 28 (47%) completed therapy. Results may be comparable to clinical participants with implications for the successful translation of CBT for insomnia.
在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们描述了认知行为疗法(CBT)在多导睡眠图(PSG)衍生的失眠障碍亚型中的可接受性、耐受性和潜在疗效:睡眠时间正常的失眠(I-NSD)和睡眠时间短的失眠(I-SSD)。所有研究志愿者都可以获得数字 CBT、单一成分睡眠限制疗法和面对面小组 CBT。治疗后三个月使用失眠严重指数(ISI)进行随访。96 名参与者(61 名女性,平均年龄 41 岁)分为正常睡眠组(n=53)和短睡眠组(n=43)。63%的参与者(正常睡眠组=31,短睡眠组=29)接受了 CBT,28 名参与者完成了治疗(耐受性:正常睡眠组=11,短睡眠组=17)。对于潜在疗效,96 名参与者中的 39 名(正常睡眠组=20,短睡眠组=19)完成了随访 ISI 评估。在这个减少的样本中,两组的平均(SD)ISI 评分均降低(正常睡眠:18.0(4.0)至 10.7(4.6);短睡眠:16.5(5.5)至 11.0(6.3);均 P<0.01)。与短睡眠组相比,正常睡眠组对 CBT 的反应(ISI 降低≥6 分)更有可能(70%,n=14/20 与 37%,n=7/19,P=0.038)。在该队列中,60 名(63%)参与者尝试了 CBT,其中 28 名(47%)完成了治疗。结果可能与接受 CBT 治疗的临床参与者相似,这对成功推广失眠症的 CBT 具有启示意义。