Suppr超能文献

多导睡眠图定义的失眠障碍亚型的认知行为疗法的可接受性、耐受性和潜在疗效:一项回顾性队列研究。

Acceptability, tolerability, and potential efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy for Insomnia Disorder subtypes defined by polysomnography: A retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Big Health Ltd, London, UK.

CIRUS, Centre for Sleep and Chronobiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 27;8(1):6664. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25033-3.

Abstract

In this retrospective cohort study, we describe acceptability, tolerability and potential efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in Insomnia Disorder subtypes, derived from polysomnography (PSG): insomnia with normal-sleep duration (I-NSD) and insomnia with short-sleep duration (I-SSD). All research volunteers were offered access to digital CBT, single component sleep restriction therapy and face-to-face group CBT. Follow-up occurred at three months post-treatment using the insomnia severity index (ISI). 96 participants (61 females, mean age of 41 years) were grouped into either normal-sleep (n = 53) or short-sleep (n = 43). CBT was acceptable to 63% of participants (normal-sleep = 31, short-sleep = 29), with 28 completing therapy (tolerability: normal-sleep = 11, short-sleep = 17). For potential efficacy, 39 (normal-sleep = 20, short-sleep = 19) out of 96 participants (41%) completed a follow-up ISI assessment. In this reduced sample, mean (SD) ISI scores decreased across both groups (normal-sleep: 18.0 (4.0) to 10.7 (4.6); short-sleep: 16.5 (5.5) to 11.0 (6.3); both P < 0.01). Those with normal-sleep were more likely to respond (≥6-point ISI reduction) to CBT compared to short-sleep (70%, n = 14/20 vs. 37%, n = 7/19 respectively, P = 0.038). In this cohort, 60 (63%) of participants attempted CBT and of those 28 (47%) completed therapy. Results may be comparable to clinical participants with implications for the successful translation of CBT for insomnia.

摘要

在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们描述了认知行为疗法(CBT)在多导睡眠图(PSG)衍生的失眠障碍亚型中的可接受性、耐受性和潜在疗效:睡眠时间正常的失眠(I-NSD)和睡眠时间短的失眠(I-SSD)。所有研究志愿者都可以获得数字 CBT、单一成分睡眠限制疗法和面对面小组 CBT。治疗后三个月使用失眠严重指数(ISI)进行随访。96 名参与者(61 名女性,平均年龄 41 岁)分为正常睡眠组(n=53)和短睡眠组(n=43)。63%的参与者(正常睡眠组=31,短睡眠组=29)接受了 CBT,28 名参与者完成了治疗(耐受性:正常睡眠组=11,短睡眠组=17)。对于潜在疗效,96 名参与者中的 39 名(正常睡眠组=20,短睡眠组=19)完成了随访 ISI 评估。在这个减少的样本中,两组的平均(SD)ISI 评分均降低(正常睡眠:18.0(4.0)至 10.7(4.6);短睡眠:16.5(5.5)至 11.0(6.3);均 P<0.01)。与短睡眠组相比,正常睡眠组对 CBT 的反应(ISI 降低≥6 分)更有可能(70%,n=14/20 与 37%,n=7/19,P=0.038)。在该队列中,60 名(63%)参与者尝试了 CBT,其中 28 名(47%)完成了治疗。结果可能与接受 CBT 治疗的临床参与者相似,这对成功推广失眠症的 CBT 具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d562/5923902/e35999c8983f/41598_2018_25033_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验