Aliaga-Del Castillo Aron, Silva Aline Oliveira da, Maranhão Olga Benário Vieira, Barros Sérgio Estelita, Niederberger Ana, Bellini-Pereira Silvio Augusto, Garib Daniela, Janson Guilherme
Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Mar;163(3):389-397. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.12.024. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
Class II malocclusion treatment efficiency with maxillary premolar extractions has been reported. However, no study evaluated the root resorption associated with this protocol. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the degree of root resorption of the maxillary incisors in Class II malocclusion treatment with and without maxillary premolar extractions.
The sample consisted of 56 patients with complete Class II malocclusion, divided into 2 groups. Group 1 comprised 28 patients (10 female, 18 male) treated with maxillary first premolar extractions, and group 2 was composed of 28 patients (16 female, 12 male) treated without extractions. The groups were matched regarding initial age, treatment time, crowding, initial malocclusion severity, finishing quality, initial overjet, and overbite. Periapical radiographs of the maxillary incisors were used to assess the degree of root resorption using a scoring system. In addition, treatment changes involving maxillary incisors were evaluated in lateral headfilms. Intergroup comparisons were performed with t, Mann-Whitney U, and chi-square tests (P <0.05).
Overjet, overbite, inclination, vertical positional changes, and vertical and horizontal apical displacements of maxillary incisors were similar between groups. There was no statistically significant difference between groups regarding root resorption of maxillary incisors. Root resorption degree ranged from mild to moderate in both groups.
Treating complete Class II malocclusion with 2 maxillary premolar extractions resulted in a similar root resorption as treating without maxillary premolar extractions. An individualized evaluation of root resorption predisposing factors should be performed for each patient.
已有报道关于拔除上颌前磨牙治疗安氏II类错牙合的效率。然而,尚无研究评估该治疗方案相关的牙根吸收情况。因此,本研究旨在比较拔除与不拔除上颌前磨牙治疗安氏II类错牙合时上颌切牙的牙根吸收程度。
样本包括56例安氏II类错牙合完全病例,分为2组。第1组由28例患者(10例女性,18例男性)组成,接受上颌第一前磨牙拔除治疗,第2组由28例患者(16例女性,12例男性)组成,未接受拔牙治疗。两组在初始年龄、治疗时间、牙列拥挤度、初始错牙合严重程度、矫治完成质量、初始覆盖及覆牙合方面进行匹配。使用根尖片通过评分系统评估上颌切牙的牙根吸收程度。此外,在头颅侧位片上评估上颌切牙的治疗变化。采用t检验、曼-惠特尼U检验和卡方检验进行组间比较(P<0.05)。
两组上颌切牙的覆盖、覆牙合、倾斜度、垂直位置变化以及垂直和水平根尖位移相似。两组在上颌切牙牙根吸收方面无统计学显著差异。两组的牙根吸收程度均为轻度至中度。
拔除两颗上颌前磨牙治疗安氏II类错牙合完全病例与不拔除上颌前磨牙治疗导致的牙根吸收相似。应对每位患者进行牙根吸收易感因素的个体化评估。