Suppr超能文献

孕妇和产后妇女与医护人员就吸烟问题进行互动的体验:定性系统评价。

Pregnant and postnatal women's experiences of interacting with health care providers about their tobacco smoking: a qualitative systematic review.

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.

Memorial University Faculty of Nursing Collaboration for Evidence-Based Nursing and Primary Health Care: A JBI Affiliated Group, St. John's, NL, Canada.

出版信息

JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Jun 1;21(6):1066-1189. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00052.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was twofold: i) to comprehensively identify the best available evidence about the experiences of women who smoked tobacco during pregnancy or postnatally (or both) concerning health care providers' interactions with them about their smoking, when such interactions occurred during contact for prenatal or postnatal health care in any health care setting; and ii) to synthesize the research findings for recommendations to strengthen health care providers' interventions regarding smoking during pregnancy and smoking during the postnatal period.

INTRODUCTION

Maternal tobacco smoking during pregnancy and maternal tobacco smoking postnatally pose serious health risks for the woman, fetus, and offspring, whereas maternal smoking cessation has beneficial health effects. Given the importance of health care providers' interactions with pregnant and postnatal women for smoking cessation care, it is essential to understand women's experiences of such interactions.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Studies considered for this review had qualitative research findings about the experiences of women who smoked tobacco during pregnancy or postnatally (or both) in relation to health care providers' interactions with them about their smoking.

METHODS

The review was conducted using the JBI approach to qualitative systematic reviews. Published studies were sought through 6 academic databases (eg, CINAHL, MEDLINE). Unpublished studies were searched in 6 gray literature sources (eg, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, Google Scholar). Reference lists of retrieved records were also searched. The searches occurred in October and November 2020; no country, language, or date limits were applied. Study selection involved title and abstract screening, full-text examination, and critical appraisal of all studies that met the inclusion criteria for the review. Study characteristics and research findings were extracted from the included studies. Study selection and extraction of findings were conducted by 2 reviewers independently; differences between reviewers were resolved through consensus. The research findings were categorized, and the categories were aggregated into a set of synthesized findings. The synthesized findings were assigned confidence scores. The categories and finalized synthesized findings were agreed upon by all reviewers.

RESULTS

The 57 included studies varied in qualitative research designs and in methodological quality (from mostly low to high). There were approximately 1092 eligible participants, and 250 credible and unequivocal research findings. The research findings yielded 14 categories and 6 synthesized findings with low to very low confidence scores. Some women who smoked tobacco during pregnancy and some women who smoked tobacco postnatally lacked supportive interactions by health care providers regarding their smoking; other women experienced supportive interactions by health care providers. Women were adversely impacted when health care providers' interactions lacked supportiveness, and were beneficially impacted when interactions were supportive. Women varied in openness to health care providers' interactions regarding their smoking, from not being receptive to being accepting, and some women wanted meaningful health care provider interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Although confidence in the synthesized findings is low to very low, the evidence indicates that supportive health care provider interactions may facilitate positive smoking behavior change in pregnancy and postnatally. It is recommended that health care providers implement accepted clinical practice guidelines with women who smoke prenatally or postnatally, using an approach that is person-centered, emotionally supportive, engaging (eg, understanding), and non-authoritarian.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42020178866.

摘要

目的

本次综述有两个目的:i)全面确定有关在怀孕期间或产后(或两者兼有)吸烟的女性的最佳现有证据,涉及卫生保健提供者在任何医疗保健环境中进行产前或产后保健接触时与她们就吸烟问题进行的互动;ii)综合研究结果,为加强卫生保健提供者干预妊娠期间和产后期间吸烟的建议提供依据。

介绍

孕妇吸烟和产妇吸烟对女性、胎儿和后代都构成严重的健康风险,而产妇戒烟则对健康有益。鉴于卫生保健提供者与孕妇和产妇互动对于戒烟护理的重要性,了解妇女对这种互动的体验至关重要。

纳入标准

本次综述考虑了有关在怀孕期间或产后(或两者兼有)吸烟的女性的经验的定性研究结果,涉及卫生保健提供者与她们就吸烟问题进行的互动。

方法

综述使用 JBI 定性系统评价方法进行。通过 6 个学术数据库(如 CINAHL、MEDLINE)检索已发表的研究。在 6 个灰色文献来源(如 ProQuest 论文和论文集、Google Scholar)中搜索未发表的研究。还对检索记录的参考文献进行了搜索。搜索于 2020 年 10 月和 11 月进行;没有对研究进行国家、语言或日期限制。研究选择涉及标题和摘要筛选、全文检查以及对符合综述纳入标准的所有研究进行批判性评估。从纳入的研究中提取研究特征和研究结果。两名评审员独立进行研究选择和结果提取;评审员之间的差异通过协商解决。研究结果进行了分类,并将类别汇总为一组综合研究结果。综合研究结果分配了置信分数。类别和最终综合研究结果得到了所有评审员的认可。

结果

57 项纳入的研究在定性研究设计和方法学质量方面存在差异(从低到高)。大约有 1092 名合格参与者,有 250 条可信且明确的研究结果。研究结果产生了 14 个类别和 6 个置信度得分低到非常低的综合研究结果。一些在怀孕期间吸烟的女性和一些在产后吸烟的女性缺乏卫生保健提供者关于她们吸烟问题的支持性互动;其他女性则得到了卫生保健提供者的支持性互动。当卫生保健提供者的互动缺乏支持性时,女性会受到不利影响,而当互动具有支持性时,女性会受益。女性对卫生保健提供者关于她们吸烟问题的互动的开放性存在差异,从不接受到接受,有些女性希望与卫生保健提供者进行有意义的互动。

结论

尽管综合研究结果的置信度低到非常低,但证据表明,支持性的卫生保健提供者互动可能有助于促进怀孕期间和产后吸烟行为的积极改变。建议卫生保健提供者在产前或产后与吸烟的女性一起实施公认的临床实践指南,采用以患者为中心、情感支持、参与(例如,理解)和非专制的方法。

系统评价注册编号

PROSPERO CRD42020178866。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验