Drug Disposition Department, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Clinical Pharmacology and Quantitative Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, Research & Development, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jun;113(6):1185-1198. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2814. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
Typically, therapeutic proteins (TPs) have a low risk for eliciting meaningful drug interactions (DIs). However, there are select instances where TP drug interactions (TP-DIs) of clinical concern can occur. This white paper discusses the various types of TP-DIs involving mechanisms such as changes in disease state, target-mediated drug disposition, neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), or antidrug antibodies formation. The nature of TP drug interaction being investigated should determine whether the examination is conducted as a standalone TP-DI study in healthy participants, in patients, or assessed via population pharmacokinetic analysis. DIs involving antibody-drug conjugates are discussed briefly, but the primary focus here will be DIs involving cytokine modulation. Cytokine modulation can occur directly by certain TPs, or indirectly due to moderate to severe inflammation, infection, or injury. Disease states that have been shown to result in indirect disease-DIs that are clinically meaningful have been listed (i.e., typically a twofold change in the systemic exposure of a coadministered sensitive cytochrome P450 substrate drug). Type of disease and severity of inflammation should be the primary drivers for risk assessment for disease-DIs. While more clinical inflammatory marker data needs to be collected, the use of two or more clinical inflammatory markers (such as C-reactive protein, albumin, or interleukin 6) may help broadly categorize whether the predicted magnitude of inflammatory disease-DI risk is negligible, weak, or moderate to strong. Based on current knowledge, clinical DI studies are not necessary for all TPs, and should no longer be conducted in certain disease patient populations such as psoriasis, which do not have sufficient systemic inflammation to cause a meaningful indirect disease-DI.
通常情况下,治疗性蛋白(TPs)引发有意义的药物相互作用(DIs)的风险较低。然而,在某些情况下,可能会出现具有临床意义的 TP 药物相互作用(TP-DIs)。本白皮书讨论了涉及疾病状态变化、靶向药物处置、新生儿 Fc 受体(FcRn)或抗药物抗体形成等机制的各种类型的 TP-DIs。正在研究的 TP 药物相互作用的性质应决定是否在健康参与者中进行独立的 TP-DI 研究,还是在患者中进行研究,或通过群体药代动力学分析进行评估。本文简要讨论了涉及抗体药物偶联物的 DIs,但主要重点将是涉及细胞因子调节的 DIs。细胞因子调节可以由某些 TPs 直接引起,也可以由于中度至重度炎症、感染或损伤间接引起。已经列出了已显示导致具有临床意义的间接疾病-DIs 的疾病状态(即,通常是合并给予的敏感细胞色素 P450 底物药物的全身暴露增加两倍)。疾病类型和炎症的严重程度应是疾病-DI 风险评估的主要驱动因素。虽然需要收集更多的临床炎症标志物数据,但使用两个或更多临床炎症标志物(如 C 反应蛋白、白蛋白或白细胞介素 6)可能有助于广泛分类炎症疾病-DI 风险的预测幅度是否可忽略不计、较弱或中度至强。根据目前的知识,并非所有 TPs 都需要进行临床 DI 研究,并且不应再在某些疾病患者人群中进行此类研究,例如银屑病,因为其没有足够的全身炎症来引起有意义的间接疾病-DI。