Chang Kun-Chia, Chen Hsin-Pao, Huang Shih-Wei, Chen Jung-Sheng, Potenza Marc N, Pakpour Amir H, Lin Chung-Ying
Department of General Psychiatry, Jianan Psychiatric Center, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Psychiatry, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 Dec 2;13:20406223221140393. doi: 10.1177/20406223221140393. eCollection 2022.
Substance use is an important issue worldwide and people with substance use disorders (SUDs) have been reported to have high levels of psychological distress and self-stigma. Therefore, psychological distress and self-stigma in people with SUDs are considerable.
The present study used a longitudinal design to examine whether treatment-as-usual approaches in Taiwan improve psychological distress and self-stigma among people with three types of SUDs (heroin, amphetamine, and alcohol use disorders).
A 9-month longitudinal design involving four assessments spaced 3 months apart.
Convenience sampling was used to recruit people with heroin ( = 112), amphetamine ( = 151), and alcohol ( = 56) use disorders from outpatient psychiatric center in Southern Taiwan. Psychological distress was assessed using the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS-21), and self-stigma was assessed using the Self-Stigma Scale-Short (SSS-S). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were constructed to understand between-group differences in psychological distress and self-stigma over time.
Patients with heroin and amphetamine use disorders had lower levels of psychological distress as compared with those with alcohol use disorder. Levels of psychological distress were lower at Time 2 to Time 4 as compared with Time 1. Patients with heroin and amphetamine use disorders had higher levels of self-stigma as compared with those with alcohol use disorder. Self-stigma levels remained stable over time. The dropout rate of receiving treatment-as-usual approach in the 9-month study was 60%.
Treatment as usual for SUDs among outpatients in Taiwan may decrease psychological distress but not self-stigma. However, such effects need to be further examined given the high drop-out rates and absence of a control condition. The findings suggest that self-stigma may warrant additional treatment for patients with SUDs.
物质使用是一个全球性的重要问题,据报道,患有物质使用障碍(SUDs)的人心理困扰和自我污名化程度较高。因此,SUDs患者的心理困扰和自我污名化问题较为严重。
本研究采用纵向设计,以检验台湾地区常规治疗方法是否能改善三种类型SUDs(海洛因、苯丙胺和酒精使用障碍)患者的心理困扰和自我污名化。
为期9个月的纵向设计,包括四次评估,间隔3个月。
采用便利抽样法,从台湾南部的门诊精神科中心招募患有海洛因(n = 1,12)、苯丙胺(n = 151)和酒精(n = 56)使用障碍的患者。使用抑郁、焦虑、压力量表(DASS-21)评估心理困扰,使用自我污名简短量表(SSS-S)评估自我污名化。构建广义估计方程(GEE)模型,以了解不同时间心理困扰和自我污名化的组间差异。
与酒精使用障碍患者相比,海洛因和苯丙胺使用障碍患者的心理困扰水平较低。与第1次评估相比,第2次至第4次评估时心理困扰水平较低。与酒精使用障碍患者相比,海洛因和苯丙胺使用障碍患者的自我污名化水平较高。自我污名化水平随时间保持稳定。在为期9个月的研究中,接受常规治疗方法的患者脱落率为60%。
台湾地区门诊SUDs患者的常规治疗可能会减轻心理困扰,但不会减轻自我污名化。然而,鉴于高脱落率和缺乏对照条件,这些效果需要进一步研究。研究结果表明,自我污名化可能需要对SUDs患者进行额外治疗。