Suppr超能文献

为重病患者做出治疗选择的人群中的遗产观念:一项范围审查的方案

Conceptions of Legacy Among People Making Treatment Choices for Serious Illness: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

作者信息

Figueroa Gray Marlaine, Banegas Matthew P, Henrikson Nora B

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States.

Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Dec 9;11(12):e40791. doi: 10.2196/40791.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Legacy-what one leaves behind and how one hopes to be remembered after death-is an unexplored and important dimension of decision-making for people facing serious illnesses. A preliminary literature review suggests that patients facing serious illness consider legacy when making medical decisions, for example, forgoing expensive treatment with limited or unknown clinical benefit to preserve one's inheritance for their children. To date, very little is known about the conceptual foundations of legacy. No conceptual frameworks exist that provide a comprehensive understanding of how legacy considerations relate to patient choices about their medical care.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this scoping review is to understand the extent and type of research addressing the concept of legacy by people facing serious illness to inform a conceptual framework of legacy and patient treatment choices.

METHODS

This protocol follows the guidelines put forth by Levac et al, which expands the framework introduced by Arksey and O'Malley, as well as the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer's manual. This scoping review will explore several electronic databases including PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and others and will include legacy-specific gray literature, including dissertation research available via ProQuest. An initial search will be conducted in English-language literature from 1990 to the present with selected keywords to identify relevant articles and refine the search strategy. After the search strategy has been finalized, 2 independent reviewers will undertake a 2-part study selection process. In the first step, reviewers will screen article titles and abstracts to identify the eligibility of each article based on predetermined exclusion or inclusion criteria. A third senior reviewer will arbitrate discrepancies regarding inclusions or exclusions. During the second step, the full texts will be screened by 2 reviewers, and only relevant articles will be kept. Relevant study data will be extracted, collated, and charted to summarize the key findings related to the construct of legacy.

RESULTS

This study will identify how people facing serious illness define legacy, and how their thinking about legacy impacts the choices they make about their medical treatments. We will note gaps in the literature base. The findings of this study will inform a conceptual model that outlines how ideas about legacy impact the patient's treatment choices. The results of this study will be submitted to an indexed journal.

CONCLUSIONS

Very little is known about the role of legacy in the treatment decisions of patients across the continuum of serious illness. In particular, no comprehensive conceptual model exists that would provide an understanding of how legacy is considered by people making decisions about their care during serious illness. This study will be among the first to construct a conceptual model detailing how considerations of legacy impact medical decision-making for people facing or living with serious illnesses.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/40791.

摘要

背景

遗产——一个人留下的东西以及人们希望死后如何被铭记——是面临严重疾病的人在做决策时一个未被探索但很重要的方面。初步的文献综述表明,面临严重疾病的患者在做医疗决策时会考虑遗产因素,例如,放弃临床益处有限或未知的昂贵治疗,以便为子女保留遗产。迄今为止,人们对遗产的概念基础知之甚少。不存在能全面理解遗产考量与患者医疗护理选择之间关系的概念框架。

目的

本范围综述的目的是了解针对面临严重疾病的人对遗产概念进行研究的范围和类型,以为遗产概念框架及患者治疗选择提供参考。

方法

本方案遵循Levac等人提出的指南,该指南扩展了Arksey和O'Malley引入的框架以及乔安娜·布里格斯研究所评审手册。本范围综述将探索多个电子数据库,包括PubMed、Medline、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、PsycINFO等,还将纳入特定于遗产的灰色文献,包括通过ProQuest获取的博士论文研究。将从1990年至今的英文文献中使用选定的关键词进行初步搜索,以识别相关文章并完善搜索策略。在搜索策略最终确定后,两名独立评审员将进行两部分的研究筛选过程。第一步,评审员将筛选文章标题和摘要,根据预先确定的排除或纳入标准确定每篇文章的合格性。第三名资深评审员将对纳入或排除的差异进行仲裁。第二步,由两名评审员筛选全文,仅保留相关文章。将提取、整理和制表相关研究数据,以总结与遗产概念相关的关键发现。

结果

本研究将确定面临严重疾病的人如何定义遗产,以及他们对遗产的思考如何影响他们对医疗治疗的选择。我们将指出文献基础中的空白。本研究的结果将为一个概念模型提供参考,该模型概述了遗产观念如何影响患者的治疗选择。本研究的结果将提交给一本索引期刊。

结论

对于遗产在严重疾病患者治疗决策中的作用,人们知之甚少。特别是,不存在能全面理解在严重疾病期间做护理决策的人如何考虑遗产的概念模型。本研究将是首批构建详细说明遗产考量如何影响面临严重疾病或患有严重疾病的人医疗决策的概念模型的研究之一。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/40791

相似文献

3
Personal legacy and treatment choices for serious illness: a scoping review.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2302-e2315. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004439.

引用本文的文献

1
Legacy in End-of-Life Care: A Concept Analysis.
Nurs Rep. 2024 Sep 14;14(3):2385-2397. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14030177.
2
Personal legacy and treatment choices for serious illness: a scoping review.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2302-e2315. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004439.

本文引用的文献

1
Improved Parent-Child Communication following a RCT Evaluating a Legacy Intervention for Children with Advanced Cancer.
Prog Palliat Care. 2021;29(3):130-139. doi: 10.1080/09699260.2020.1826778. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
3
Legacy perceptions and interventions for adults and children receiving palliative care: A systematic review.
Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;35(3):529-551. doi: 10.1177/0269216321989565. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
4
Memorialisation during COVID-19: implications for the bereaved, service providers and policy makers.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2020 Dec 15;14:2632352420980456. doi: 10.1177/2632352420980456. eCollection 2020.
6
Defining Legacy: The Perceptions of Pediatric Health Care Providers.
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2020 Oct;59(11):1004-1010. doi: 10.1177/0009922820940808. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
7
Healing the Hearts of Bereaved Parents: Impact of Legacy Artwork on Grief in Pediatric Oncology.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Oct;60(4):790-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
8
Patients' priorities in a reminiscence and legacy intervention in palliative care.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2019 Dec 19;13:2632352419892629. doi: 10.1177/2632352419892629. eCollection 2019.
9
The Evolving Landscape: Funerals, Cemeteries, Memorialization, and Bereavement Support.
Omega (Westport). 2021 Dec;84(2):596-616. doi: 10.1177/0030222820904877. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
10
Legacies and Relationships: Diverse Social Networks and BRCA1/2 Risk Management Decisions and Actions.
J Fam Nurs. 2019 Feb;25(1):28-53. doi: 10.1177/1074840718815844. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验