Giambuzzi Ilaria, Bonalumi Giorgia, Ballan Giulia, Messi Pietro, Bonomi Alice, Maggiore Analia, Esposito Giampiero, Di Mauro Michele, Alamanni Francesco, Zanobini Marco
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, 20137 Milan, Italy.
I.R.C.C.S. Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, 20157 Milan, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 30;11(23):7104. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237104.
Redo surgeries are becoming more common because of an increased rate of bioprosthesis implantation. We performed a retrospective study on patients who underwent redo replacement of an aortic and/or mitral bioprosthesis between 2005 and 2018 to evaluate intra-hospital mortality and morbidity. Univariate analysis was performed on the propensity score variables to determine predictors of mortality. A total of 180 patients were enrolled in the study: Group A (replacement of aortic bioprosthesis) with 136 patients (75.56%) and group B (replacement of mitral bioprosthesis ± aortic bioprosthesis) with 44 patients (24.44%). NYHA class ≥ 3 and female sex were significantly more common in group B. Cardiopulmonary-bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time in group A and group B were, respectively, 154.95 ± 74.35 and 190.25 ± 77.44 (p = 0.0005) and 115.99 ± 53.54 and 144.91 ± 52.53 (p = 0.0004). Overall mortality was 8.89%. After propensity score adjustment, Group B was confirmed to have an increased risk of death (OR 3.32 CI 95% 1.02−10.88 p < 0.0001), gastrointestinal complications (OR 7.784 CI 95% 1.005−60.282 p < 0.0002) and pulmonary complications (OR 2.381 CI 95% 1.038−5.46 p < 0.0001). At the univariate analysis, endocarditis, cardiopulmonary-bypass and aortic cross clamping time, NYHA class ≥ 3 and urgency setting were significantly associated to death. Intra-hospital outcomes were acceptable regarding mortality and complications. Patients who need redo surgery on mitral bioprosthesis have an increased risk of post-operative pulmonary and gastrointestinal complications and mortality. Therefore the choice of mitral bioprosthesis at time of first surgery should be carefully evaluated.
由于生物假体植入率的增加,再次手术变得越来越普遍。我们对2005年至2018年间接受主动脉和/或二尖瓣生物假体再次置换的患者进行了一项回顾性研究,以评估院内死亡率和发病率。对倾向评分变量进行单因素分析,以确定死亡率的预测因素。共有180例患者纳入研究:A组(主动脉生物假体置换)136例(75.56%),B组(二尖瓣生物假体置换±主动脉生物假体置换)44例(24.44%)。B组中纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级≥3级和女性更为常见。A组和B组的体外循环时间和主动脉阻断时间分别为154.95±74.35和190.25±77.44(p=0.0005)以及115.99±53.54和144.91±52.53(p=0.0004)。总体死亡率为8.89%。经过倾向评分调整后,证实B组死亡风险增加(比值比[OR]3.32,95%置信区间[CI]1.02 -