• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃肠道出血的输血实践 - 三级医疗单中心分析。

Transfusion Practices in Gastrointestinal Bleeding - a Tertiary Care Single-Centre Analysis.

机构信息

Transfusion Medicine Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, 218728Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296221087219. doi: 10.1177/10760296221087219.

DOI:10.1177/10760296221087219
PMID:36503291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9749046/
Abstract

Acute upper or lower Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a clinical emergency in which transfusion can be lifesaving. An individualized and restrictive transfusion strategy is recommended. This study aims to analyze and evaluate GIB transfusion practices during one year in a large tertiary hospital in Lisbon, Portugal. All patients with GIB and transfusion support during 2014 were identified and clinical data collected and statistically treated. There were 1005 GIB transfusion episodes, in a total of 494 patients. Upper GIB was more common. The median haemoglobin concentration that triggered RBC transfusion was 7,6 g/dL with a median of 2 RBC per episode. In 21,9% of episodes, RBC were used in combination with other therapies, in 70,8%, only RBC were administered and in 7,3% RBC were not used at all. In the subgroup of patients receiving FC and/or PCC there were higher median of blood products transfused: RBC (3 17 units), FFP (3 units), PC (1 unit). In a large percentage of the transfusion episodes for GIB, only RBC were used whereas only 7,3% of the GIB didn't require RBC transfusion. Patients requiring FC and/or PCC, needed more allogenic components. We observed, in accordance with the latest clinical practice guidelines and the published literature, a restrictive transfusion approach in our clinical practice.

摘要

急性上或下胃肠道出血(GIB)是一种临床急症,输血可以救命。推荐采用个体化和限制性输血策略。本研究旨在分析和评估葡萄牙里斯本一家大型三级医院一年内的 GIB 输血实践。确定了 2014 年所有 GIB 伴输血支持的患者,并收集了临床数据并进行了统计学处理。共有 1005 例 GIB 输血发作,共涉及 494 名患者。上 GIB 更为常见。触发 RBC 输血的血红蛋白浓度中位数为 7.6 g/dL,每例平均输 2 个 RBC。在 21.9%的病例中,RBC 与其他疗法联合使用,在 70.8%的病例中,仅给予 RBC,在 7.3%的病例中,根本未使用 RBC。在接受 FC 和/或 PCC 的患者亚组中,输注的血液制品中位数更高:RBC(317 单位)、FFP(3 单位)、PC(1 单位)。在 GIB 输血的大部分病例中,仅使用 RBC,而只有 7.3%的 GIB 不需要 RBC 输血。需要 FC 和/或 PCC 的患者需要更多同种异体成分。我们观察到,与最新的临床实践指南和已发表的文献一致,我们的临床实践中采用了限制性输血方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a201/9749046/5aeb48a96cd5/10.1177_10760296221087219-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a201/9749046/5aeb48a96cd5/10.1177_10760296221087219-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a201/9749046/5aeb48a96cd5/10.1177_10760296221087219-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Transfusion Practices in Gastrointestinal Bleeding - a Tertiary Care Single-Centre Analysis.胃肠道出血的输血实践 - 三级医疗单中心分析。
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2022 Jan-Dec;28:10760296221087219. doi: 10.1177/10760296221087219.
2
Restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (TRIGGER): a pragmatic, open-label, cluster randomised feasibility trial.限制与自由输血用于急性上消化道出血(TRIGGER):一项实用、开放标签、整群随机可行性试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jul 11;386(9989):137-44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61999-1. Epub 2015 May 5.
3
Determinants of empiric transfusion in gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.急诊科胃肠道出血经验性输血的决定因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 May;38(5):962-965. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.12.026. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
4
Potential benefits of restrictive transfusion in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.限制输血对上消化道出血的潜在益处:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 12;13(1):17301. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44271-8.
5
Benefits and harms of red blood cell transfusions in patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中感染性休克患者红细胞输血的益处与危害
Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).
6
Clinical coding data algorithm to categorize type of gastrointestinal bleeding as a primary reason for massive transfusion: results from the Australian and New Zealand Massive Transfusion Registry.临床编码数据算法将胃肠道出血类型归类为大量输血的主要原因:来自澳大利亚和新西兰大量输血登记处的结果。
Vox Sang. 2019 Nov;114(8):853-860. doi: 10.1111/vox.12840. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
7
Red blood cell transfusions for emergency department patients with gastrointestinal bleeding within an integrated health system.在综合卫生系统中,为急诊科胃肠道出血的患者输注红细胞。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr;38(4):746-753. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.019. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
8
Red blood cell transfusion is associated with further bleeding and fresh-frozen plasma with mortality in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.在非静脉曲张性上消化道出血中,输注红细胞与进一步出血相关,而输注新鲜冰冻血浆则与死亡率相关。
Transfusion. 2016 Apr;56(4):816-26. doi: 10.1111/trf.13446. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
9
Blood transfusion practices in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: response to a landmark study.上消化道出血的输血实践:对一项具有里程碑意义的研究的回应。
J Investig Med. 2020 Apr;68(4):882-887. doi: 10.1136/jim-2019-001199. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
10
Outcomes following restrictive or liberal red blood cell transfusion in patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding.胃肠道下出血患者限制性或宽松性红细胞输血的结果。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Apr;49(7):919-925. doi: 10.1111/apt.15158. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Impact of Red Blood Cell Transfusion Location on Gastrointestinal Bleeding Outcomes: Emergency Department vs. Inpatient Unit.红细胞输注地点对胃肠道出血结局的临床影响:急诊科与住院病房的比较
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;13(14):1656. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141656.

本文引用的文献

1
Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion.输血阈值指导红细胞输血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
2
The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fifth edition.欧洲创伤后大出血及凝血功能障碍管理指南:第五版。
Crit Care. 2019 Mar 27;23(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2347-3.
3
Change of transfusion and treatment paradigm in major trauma patients.严重创伤患者的输血和治疗模式的改变。
Anaesthesia. 2017 Nov;72(11):1317-1326. doi: 10.1111/anae.13920. Epub 2017 May 23.
4
Management of severe perioperative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology: First update 2016.严重围手术期出血的管理:欧洲麻醉学会指南:2016年首次更新
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Jun;34(6):332-395. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000630.
5
AAGBI guidelines: the use of blood components and their alternatives 2016.AAGBI 指南:血液成分及其替代品的使用 2016 年版。
Anaesthesia. 2016 Jul;71(7):829-42. doi: 10.1111/anae.13489. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
6
Blood transfusion: summary of NICE guidance.输血:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南总结
BMJ. 2015 Nov 18;351:h5832. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5832.
7
Multidisciplinary consensus document on the management of massive haemorrhage (HEMOMAS document).关于大量出血管理的多学科共识文件(HEMOMAS文件)。
Med Intensiva. 2015 Nov;39(8):483-504. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
8
A practical guideline for the haematological management of major haemorrhage.大出血血液学管理实用指南。
Br J Haematol. 2015 Sep;170(6):788-803. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13580. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
9
Interventional Algorithms for the Control of Coagulopathic Bleeding in Surgical, Trauma, and Postpartum Settings: Recommendations From the Share Network Group.手术、创伤及产后环境中控制凝血病性出血的介入算法:共享网络小组的建议
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2016 Mar;22(2):121-37. doi: 10.1177/1076029614559773. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
10
[The 2013 Seville Consensus Document on alternatives to allogenic blood transfusion. An update on the Seville Document].[2013年关于异体输血替代方法的塞维利亚共识文件。塞维利亚文件的更新]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2013 May;60(5):263.e1-263.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.12.003. Epub 2013 Feb 13.