Aktan-Erciyes Aslı, Göksun Tilbe
Kadir Has University, Turkey.
Koç University, Turkey.
J Child Lang. 2023 Jan;50(1):177-197. doi: 10.1017/S0305000921000805. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
How does parental causal input relate to children's later comprehension of causal verbs? Causal constructions in verbs differ across languages. Turkish has both lexical and morphological causatives. We asked whether (1) parental causal language input varied for different types of play (guided vs. free play), (2) early parental causal language input predicted children's causal verb understanding. Twenty-nine infants participated at three timepoints. Parents used lexical causatives more than morphological ones for guided-play for both timepoints, but for free-play, the same difference was only found at Time 2. For Time 3, children were tested on a verb comprehension and a vocabulary task. Morphological causative input, but not lexical causative input, during free-play predicted children's causal verb comprehension. For guided-play, the same relation did not hold. Findings suggest a role of specific types of causal input on children's understanding of causal verbs that are received in certain play contexts.
父母的因果性语言输入与儿童后期对因果动词的理解有怎样的关系?动词中的因果结构在不同语言中存在差异。土耳其语既有词汇性使役动词,也有形态性使役动词。我们研究了以下两个问题:(1)父母的因果性语言输入在不同类型的游戏(引导式游戏与自由游戏)中是否存在差异;(2)早期父母的因果性语言输入能否预测儿童对因果动词的理解。29名婴儿在三个时间点参与了研究。在两个时间点上,父母在引导式游戏中使用词汇性使役动词的频率都高于形态性使役动词,但在自由游戏中,只有在时间点2才发现同样的差异。在时间点3,对儿童进行了动词理解和词汇任务测试。自由游戏期间的形态性使役动词输入,而非词汇性使役动词输入,能够预测儿童对因果动词的理解。对于引导式游戏,这种关系并不成立。研究结果表明,特定类型的因果性输入在儿童对特定游戏情境中所接触到的因果动词的理解中发挥着作用。