PhD student, Dentistry Biomaterials Laboratory (Biomma), School of Dentistry, Federal University of Maranhão (UFMA), São Luís, MA, Brazil.
Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University Ceuma, (UNICEUMA) São Luís, MA, Brazil.
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Jan;129(1):229.e1-229.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.11.007. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
Little is known regarding the use of preheated composite resins to bond indirect restorations and its impact on mechanical properties when compared with resin cements.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the chemical and physical properties and bond strength to enamel and ceramics of preheated composite resins and resin cements.
Two composite resins, the microhybrid Filtek Z250XT and the nanoparticulate Z350XT were tested, and 2 commercially available resin cements, the dual-polymerized Rely-X ARC and the light-polymerized Rely-X Veneer were used as controls. A device (HotSet) was used to preheat the composite resins to 69 °C before light-polymerization. The following properties were tested: flexural strength, modulus of elasticity, fracture toughness, microshear bond strength to enamel and ceramics, degree of conversion, flow, sorption and solubility, and color stability. Statistical analysis was done with ANOVA and Holm-Sidak for multiple comparisons (α=.05).
Preheating had no significant effect on the degree of conversion, flexural strength, fracture toughness, solubility, or microshear bond strength to the enamel of the tested composite resins (P>.05). However, preheating increased the sorption and reduced the microshear bond strength to the ceramic (P<.05). The flowability of the composite resins increased with heating but showed lower values when compared with both resin cements (P<.05). Color stability was more affected in the preheated composite resins than in the resin cements.
The preheating process resulted in little to no benefit in the evaluated properties for the composite resins. Resin cements appear to be the best option for cementing indirect restorations.
与树脂水门汀相比,对于用于黏接间接修复体的预热型复合树脂的使用及其对机械性能的影响,我们知之甚少。
本体外研究的目的是比较预热型复合树脂和树脂水门汀的化学和物理性能以及与釉质和陶瓷的黏接强度。
测试了两种复合树脂,即微混合Filtek Z250XT 和纳米颗粒 Z350XT,以及两种市售的树脂水门汀,即双固化 Rely-X ARC 和自酸蚀 Rely-X Veneer,作为对照。使用一种设备(HotSet)将复合树脂预热至 69°C 后再进行光聚合。测试了以下性能:弯曲强度、弹性模量、断裂韧性、与釉质和陶瓷的微剪切黏接强度、转化率、流动性、溶胀和溶解度以及颜色稳定性。使用方差分析和多重比较的 Holm-Sidak 检验进行统计分析(α=.05)。
预热对测试的复合树脂的转化率、弯曲强度、断裂韧性、溶解度或与釉质的微剪切黏接强度没有显著影响(P>.05)。然而,预热增加了复合树脂对陶瓷的溶胀,降低了其与陶瓷的微剪切黏接强度(P<.05)。复合树脂的流动性随加热而增加,但与两种树脂水门汀相比,其值较低(P<.05)。预热后的复合树脂比树脂水门汀更容易出现颜色稳定性问题。
预热过程对复合树脂的评估性能几乎没有益处。树脂水门汀似乎是黏接间接修复体的最佳选择。