Suppr超能文献

肿瘤大小和数量之和决定的中期肝细胞癌的术后结果和复发模式。

Postoperative outcomes and recurrence patterns of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma dictated by the sum of tumor size and number.

机构信息

Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 28;28(44):6271-6281. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i44.6271.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The selection criteria for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who would truly benefit from liver resection (LR) remain undefined.

AIM

To identify BCLC-B HCC patients more suitable for LR.

METHODS

We included patients undergoing curative LR for BCLC stage A or B multi-nodular HCC (MNHCC) and stratified BCLC-B patients by the sum of tumor size and number (N + S). Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), recur-rence-to-death survival (RTDS), recurrence patterns, and treatments after recurrence in BCLC-B patients in each subgroup were compared with those in BCLC-A patients.

RESULTS

In total, 143 patients who underwent curative LR for MNHCC with BCLC-A ( = 25) or BCLC-B ( = 118) were retrospectively analyzed. According to the N + S, patients with BCLC-B HCC were divided into two subgroups: BCLC-B1 (N + S ≤ 10, = 83) and BCLC-B2 (N + S > 10, = 35). Compared with BCLC-B2 patients, those with BCLC-B1 had a better OS (5-year OS rate: 67.4% 33.6%; < 0.001), which was comparable to that in BCLC-A patients (5-year OS rate: 67.4% 74.1%; = 0.250), and a better RFS (median RFS: 19 mo 7 mo; < 0.001), which was worse than that in BCLC-A patients (median RFS: 19 mo 48 mo; = 0.022). Further analysis of patients who developed recurrence showed that both BCLC-B1 and BCLC-A patients had better RTDS (median RTDS: Not reached 49 mo; = 0.599), while the RTDS in BCLC-B2 patients was worse (median RTDS: 16 mo not reached, < 0.001; 16 mo 49 mo, = 0.042). The recurrence patterns were similar between BCLC-B1 and BCLC-A patients, but BCLC-B2 patients had a shorter recurrence time and a higher proportion of patients had recurrence with macrovascular invasion and/or extrahepatic metastasis, both of which were independent risk factors for RTDS.

CONCLUSION

BCLC-B HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy with N + S ≤ 10 had mild recurrence patterns and excellent OS similar to those in BCLC-A MNHCC patients, and LR should be considered in these patients.

摘要

背景

巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)中期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中,真正受益于肝切除术(LR)的选择标准仍未确定。

目的

确定更适合 LR 的 BCLC-B HCC 患者。

方法

我们纳入了接受 BCLC 分期 A 或 B 多结节 HCC(MNHCC)根治性 LR 的患者,并根据肿瘤大小和数量之和(N+S)对 BCLC-B 患者进行分层。比较每个亚组中 BCLC-B 患者的总生存期(OS)、无复发生存期(RFS)、复发至死亡生存期(RTDS)、复发模式和复发后的治疗。

结果

共回顾性分析了 143 例接受 MNHCC 根治性 LR 的患者,其中 BCLC-A(=25)或 BCLC-B(=118)。根据 N+S,BCLC-B HCC 患者分为两组:BCLC-B1(N+S≤10,=83)和 BCLC-B2(N+S>10,=35)。与 BCLC-B2 患者相比,BCLC-B1 患者的 OS 更好(5 年 OS 率:67.4% 33.6%;<0.001),与 BCLC-A 患者相当(5 年 OS 率:67.4% 74.1%;=0.250),RFS 更好(中位 RFS:19 个月 7 个月;<0.001),但不如 BCLC-A 患者(中位 RFS:19 个月 48 个月;=0.022)。对发生复发的患者进行进一步分析显示,BCLC-B1 和 BCLC-A 患者均具有更好的 RTDS(中位 RTDS:未达到 49 个月;=0.599),而 BCLC-B2 患者的 RTDS 更差(中位 RTDS:16 个月 未达到,<0.001;16 个月 49 个月,=0.042)。BCLC-B1 和 BCLC-A 患者的复发模式相似,但 BCLC-B2 患者的复发时间更短,且更有发生大血管侵犯和/或肝外转移的比例更高,这两者都是 RTDS 的独立危险因素。

结论

N+S≤10 的 BCLC-B HCC 患者行肝切除术具有轻微的复发模式和与 BCLC-A MNHCC 患者相似的优异 OS,应考虑在这些患者中进行 LR。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e72/9730440/48485b4b8cca/WJG-28-6271-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验