Oliva A, Volpicelli L, Di Bari S, Curtolo A, Borrazzo C, Cogliati Dezza F, Cona A, Agrenzano S, Mularoni A, Trancassini M, Mengoni F, Stefani S, Raponi G, Venditti M
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome 00185, Italy.
Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome 00185, Italy.
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Dec 7;4(6):dlac121. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac121. eCollection 2022 Dec.
The primary outcome of the study was to evaluate the effect on 30 day mortality of the combination ceftazidime/avibactam + fosfomycin in the treatment of bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by KPC-producing (KPC-).
From October 2018 to March 2021, a retrospective, two-centre study was performed on patients with KPC- BSI hospitalized at Sapienza University (Rome) and ISMETT-IRCCS (Palermo) and treated with ceftazidime/avibactam-containing regimens. A matched cohort (1:1) analysis was performed. Cases were patients receiving ceftazidime/avibactam + fosfomycin and controls were patients receiving ceftazidime/avibactam alone or in combination with non-active drugs different from fosfomycin (ceftazidime/avibactam ± other). Patients were matched for age, Charlson comorbidity index, ward of isolation (ICU or non-ICU), source of infection and severity of BSI, expressed as INCREMENT carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) score.
Overall, 221 patients were included in the study. Following the 1:1 match, 122 subjects were retrieved: 61 cases (ceftazidime/avibactam + fosfomycin) and 61 controls (ceftazidime/avibactam ± other). No difference in overall mortality emerged between cases and controls, whereas controls had more non-BSI KPC- infections and a higher number of deaths attributable to secondary infections. Almost half of ceftazidime/avibactam + fosfomycin patients were prescribed fosfomycin without MIC fosfomycin availability. No difference in the outcome emerged after stratification for fosfomycin susceptibility availability and dosage. SARS-CoV-2 infection and ICS ≥ 8 independently predicted 30 day mortality, whereas an appropriate definitive therapy was protective.
Our data show that fosfomycin was used in the treatment of KPC- BSI independently from having its susceptibility testing available. Although no difference was found in 30 day overall mortality, ceftazidime/avibactam + fosfomycin was associated with a lower rate of subsequent KPC- infections and secondary infections than other ceftazidime/avibactam-based regimens.
本研究的主要结果是评估头孢他啶/阿维巴坦联合磷霉素治疗产KPC肠杆菌科细菌(KPC -)引起的血流感染(BSI)对30天死亡率的影响。
2018年10月至2021年3月,对在罗马萨皮恩扎大学和巴勒莫的ISMETT - IRCCS住院并接受含头孢他啶/阿维巴坦方案治疗的KPC - BSI患者进行了一项回顾性、双中心研究。进行了匹配队列(1:1)分析。病例为接受头孢他啶/阿维巴坦联合磷霉素的患者,对照为单独接受头孢他啶/阿维巴坦或与除磷霉素外的非活性药物联合使用(头孢他啶/阿维巴坦±其他)的患者。根据年龄、查尔森合并症指数、隔离病房(重症监护病房或非重症监护病房)、感染源和BSI严重程度(以产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科细菌(CPE)评分增量表示)对患者进行匹配。
总体而言,221名患者纳入研究。按照1:1匹配后,共纳入122名受试者:61例(头孢他啶/阿维巴坦联合磷霉素)和61名对照(头孢他啶/阿维巴坦±其他)。病例组和对照组的总体死亡率无差异,而对照组有更多非BSI的KPC - 感染以及更多归因于继发感染的死亡。几乎一半接受头孢他啶/阿维巴坦联合磷霉素治疗的患者在未获得磷霉素最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的情况下使用了磷霉素。根据磷霉素敏感性和剂量分层后,结果无差异。感染严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)和感染控制评分(ICS)≥8独立预测患者发生30天死亡,而适当的确定性治疗具有保护作用。
我们的数据表明,在未进行磷霉素药敏试验的情况下,磷霉素也被用于治疗KPC - BSI。虽然30天总体死亡率无差异,但与其他基于头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的治疗方案相比,头孢他啶/阿维巴坦联合磷霉素使后续KPC - 感染和继发感染的发生率更低。