Suppr超能文献

北欧重症监护中液体超负荷评估与治疗调查

Nordic survey on assessment and treatment of fluid overload in intensive care.

作者信息

Zeuthen Emilie, Wichmann Sine, Schønemann-Lund Martin, Järvisalo Mikko J, Rubenson-Wahlin Rebecka, Sigurðsson Martin I, Holen Erling, Bestle Morten H

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, North Zealand, Denmark.

Perioperative Services, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 25;9:1067162. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1067162. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fluid overload in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with higher mortality. There are few randomized controlled trials to guide physicians in treating patients with fluid overload in the ICU, and no guidelines exist. We aimed to elucidate how ICU physicians from Nordic countries define, assess, and treat fluid overload in the ICU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed an online questionnaire with 18 questions. The questions were pre-tested and revised by specialists in intensive care medicine. Through a network of national coordinators. The survey was distributed to a wide range of Nordic ICU physicians. The distribution started on January 5th, 2022 and ended on May 6th, 2022.

RESULTS

We received a total of 1,066 responses from Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden, and Iceland. When assessing fluid status, respondents applied clinical parameters such as clinical examination findings, cumulative fluid balance, body weight, and urine output more frequently than cardiac/lung ultrasound, radiological appearances, and cardiac output monitoring. A large proportion of the respondents agreed that a 5% increase or more in body weight from baseline supported the diagnosis of fluid overload. The preferred de-resuscitation strategy was diuretics (91%), followed by minimization of maintenance (76%) and resuscitation fluids (71%). The majority declared that despite mild hypotension, mild hypernatremia, and ongoing vasopressor, they would not withhold treatment of fluid overload and would continue diuretics. The respondents were divided when it came to treating fluid overload with loop diuretics in patients receiving noradrenaline. Around 1% would not administer noradrenaline and diuretics simultaneously and 35% did not have a fixed upper limit for the dosage. The remaining respondents 63% reported different upper limits of noradrenaline infusion (0.05-0.50 mcg/kg/min) when administering loop diuretics.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported practices among Nordic ICU physicians when assessing, diagnosing, and treating fluid overload reveals variability in the practice. A 5% increase in body weight was considered a minimum to support the diagnosis of fluid overload. Clinical examination findings were preferred for assessing, diagnosing and treating fluid overload, and diuretics were the preferred treatment modality.

摘要

引言

重症监护病房(ICU)患者的液体超负荷与更高的死亡率相关。几乎没有随机对照试验来指导医生治疗ICU中的液体超负荷患者,也没有相关指南。我们旨在阐明北欧国家的ICU医生如何定义、评估和治疗ICU中的液体超负荷。

材料与方法

我们设计了一份包含18个问题的在线问卷。这些问题经过重症医学专家的预测试和修订。通过国家协调员网络,该调查被分发给广泛的北欧ICU医生。调查于2022年1月5日开始,2022年5月6日结束。

结果

我们共收到来自丹麦、挪威、芬兰、瑞典和冰岛的1066份回复。在评估液体状态时,受访者比使用心脏/肺部超声、影像学表现和心输出量监测更频繁地应用临床参数,如临床检查结果、累积液体平衡、体重和尿量。很大一部分受访者同意,体重较基线增加5%或更多支持液体超负荷的诊断。首选的脱复苏策略是利尿剂(91%),其次是尽量减少维持液(76%)和复苏液(71%)。大多数人宣称,尽管存在轻度低血压、轻度高钠血症和正在使用血管升压药,但他们不会停止液体超负荷的治疗,而是会继续使用利尿剂。在接受去甲肾上腺素的患者中使用袢利尿剂治疗液体超负荷时,受访者存在分歧。约1%的人不会同时给予去甲肾上腺素和利尿剂,35%的人没有固定的剂量上限。其余63%的受访者报告在使用袢利尿剂时去甲肾上腺素输注的上限不同(0.05 - 0.50微克/千克/分钟)。

结论

北欧ICU医生在评估、诊断和治疗液体超负荷时的自我报告做法显示出实践中的差异。体重增加5%被认为是支持液体超负荷诊断的最低标准。临床检查结果是评估诊断和治疗液体超负荷的首选方法,利尿剂是首选的治疗方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f41/9732460/9a45c0ff1f2a/fmed-09-1067162-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验