American Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2023 Jun;44(5):1057-1067. doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-03070-0. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
The evolving breadth and complexity of the contemporary pediatric cardiology specialty requires regular, systematic analysis of the practice to ensure that training and certification requirements address the demands of real-world clinical experience. We report the process of the American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) for conducting such a practice analysis and revising the test content outline (TCO) for the pediatric cardiology subspecialty certification exam. A panel of 15 pediatric cardiologists conducted seven 2-h virtual meetings, during which they identified 37 unique tasks that represent the work a pediatric cardiologist may reasonably expect to perform within the first 5 years after training. These tasks were grouped into nine performance domains, similar to the entrustable professional activities (EPA), previously endorsed by the ABP in collaboration with the pediatric cardiology education community, and which represent the critical activities of the profession. The panel then enumerated the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary to perform each task. These deliberations resulted in two work products: a practice analysis document (PAD) and subspecialty board TCO based on testable knowledge, skills, and abilities. Survey assessments of the panel's work were then distributed to pediatric cardiology fellowship program directors and to practicing pediatric cardiologists for their input, which largely aligned with the panel's recommendations. Survey responses were considered in the final revisions of the PAD and TCO. This approach to practice analysis proved to be an efficient process for describing the work performed by today's pediatric cardiologists and the knowledge, skills, and abilities needed to competently perform that work.
当代儿科心脏病学专业的广度和复杂性不断发展,这就要求对该专业进行定期、系统的分析,以确保培训和认证要求能够满足实际临床经验的需求。我们报告了美国儿科学会(ABP)进行此类实践分析的过程,并修订了儿科心脏病学专业认证考试的测试内容大纲(TCO)。一个由 15 名儿科心脏病专家组成的小组进行了七次为期 2 小时的虚拟会议,在此期间,他们确定了 37 项独特的任务,这些任务代表了儿科心脏病专家在培训后 5 年内可能合理期望执行的工作。这些任务被分为九个绩效领域,类似于 ABP 与儿科心脏病学教育界合作之前认可的可委托专业活动(EPA),并代表该专业的关键活动。专家组随后列举了执行每项任务所需的知识、技能和能力。这些审议产生了两个工作成果:实践分析文件(PAD)和基于可测试知识、技能和能力的专业委员会 TCO。然后,向儿科心脏病学研究员项目主任和执业儿科心脏病专家分发了对小组工作的调查评估,以征求他们的意见,这些意见在很大程度上与小组的建议一致。在 PAD 和 TCO 的最终修订中考虑了调查回复。这种实践分析方法被证明是一种有效的方法,可以描述当今儿科心脏病专家所做的工作以及胜任该工作所需的知识、技能和能力。