Poljak B, Agarwal U, Alfirevic Z, Allen S, Canham N, Higgs J, Kaelin Agten A, Khalil A, Roberts D, Mone F, Navaratnam K
Fetal Medicine Unit, Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Harris-Wellbeing Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Mar;61(3):339-345. doi: 10.1002/uog.26141.
First, to determine the uptake of prenatal exome sequencing (pES) and the diagnostic yield of pathogenic (causative) variants in a UK tertiary fetal medicine unit following the introduction of the NHS England Rapid Exome Sequencing Service for fetal anomalies testing (R21 pathway). Second, to identify how the decision to proceed with pES and identification of a causative variant affect perinatal outcomes, specifically late termination of pregnancy (TOP) at or beyond 22 weeks' gestation.
This was a retrospective cohort study of anomalous fetuses referred to the Liverpool Women's Hospital Fetal Medicine Unit between 1 March 2021 and 28 February 2022. pES was performed as part of the R21 pathway. Trio exome sequencing was performed using an Illumina next-generation sequencing platform assessing coding and splice regions of a panel of 974 prenatally relevant genes and 231 expert reviewed genes. Data on demographics, phenotype, pES result and perinatal outcome were extracted and compared. Descriptive statistics and the χ-square or Fisher's exact test were performed using IBM SPSS version 28.0.1.0.
In total, 72 cases were identified and two-thirds of eligible women (n = 48) consented to trio pES. pES was not feasible in one case owing to a low DNA yield and, therefore, was performed in 47 cases. In one-third of cases (n = 24), pES was not proposed or agreed. In 58.3% (14/24) of these cases, this was because invasive testing was declined and, in 41.7% (10/24) of cases, women opted for testing and underwent chromosomal microarray analysis only. The diagnostic yield of pES was 23.4% (11/47). There was no overall difference in the proportion of women who decided to have late TOP in the group in which pES was agreed compared with the group in which pES was not proposed or agreed (25.0% (12/48) vs 25.0% (6/24); P = 1.0). However, the decision to have late TOP was significantly more frequent when a causative variant was detected compared with when pES was uninformative (63.6% (7/11) vs 13.9% (5/36); P < 0.0009). The median turnaround time for results was longer in cases in which a causative variant was identified than in those in which pES was uninformative (22 days (interquartile range (IQR), 19-34) days vs 14 days (IQR, 10-15 days); P < 0.0001).
This study demonstrates the potential impact of identification of a causative variant by pES on decision to have late TOP. As the R21 pathway continues to evolve, we urge clinicians and policymakers to consider introducing earlier screening for anomalies, developing robust guidance for late TOP and ensuring optimized support for couples. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
第一,在英国一家三级胎儿医学单位引入英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)英格兰快速外显子测序服务用于胎儿异常检测(R21途径)后,确定产前外显子测序(pES)的接受情况以及致病( causative)变异的诊断率。第二,确定进行pES的决定以及致病变异的鉴定如何影响围产期结局,特别是妊娠22周及以后的晚期终止妊娠(TOP)。
这是一项对2021年3月1日至2022年2月28日转诊至利物浦妇女医院胎儿医学科的异常胎儿进行的回顾性队列研究。pES作为R21途径的一部分进行。使用Illumina下一代测序平台进行三联体外显子测序,评估一组974个产前相关基因和231个专家评审基因的编码和剪接区域。提取并比较人口统计学、表型、pES结果和围产期结局的数据。使用IBM SPSS 28.0.1.0版进行描述性统计和卡方检验或Fisher精确检验。
共识别出72例病例,三分之二符合条件的女性(n = 48)同意进行三联体pES。由于DNA产量低,1例病例中pES不可行,因此在47例病例中进行了pES。在三分之一的病例(n = 24)中,未提议或未同意进行pES。在这些病例中,58.3%(14/24)是因为拒绝了侵入性检测,41.7%(10/24)的病例中,女性选择了检测并仅进行了染色体微阵列分析。pES的诊断率为23.4%(11/47)。同意进行pES的组与未提议或未同意进行pES的组中决定进行晚期TOP的女性比例没有总体差异(25.0%(12/48)对25.0%(6/24);P = 1.0)。然而,与pES无信息时相比,检测到致病变异时决定进行晚期TOP的频率显著更高(63.6%(7/11)对13.9%(5/36);P < 0.0009)。鉴定出致病变异的病例结果的中位周转时间比pES无信息的病例更长(22天(四分位间距(IQR),19 - 34天)对14天(IQR,10 - 15天);P < 0.0001)。
本研究证明了通过pES鉴定致病变异对晚期TOP决定的潜在影响。随着R21途径的不断发展,我们敦促临床医生和政策制定者考虑引入更早的异常筛查,制定关于晚期TOP的有力指南,并确保为夫妇提供优化的支持。© 2022作者。《妇产科超声》由John Wiley & Sons Ltd代表国际妇产科超声学会出版。