• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fetal hydrops and the Incremental yield of Next-generation sequencing over standard prenatal Diagnostic testing (FIND) study: prospective cohort study and meta-analysis.胎儿水肿与下一代测序对标准产前诊断检测(FIND)的增量收益(FIND)研究:前瞻性队列研究和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):509-518. doi: 10.1002/uog.23652.
2
COngenital heart disease and the Diagnostic yield with Exome sequencing (CODE) study: prospective cohort study and systematic review.先天性心脏病与外显子组测序的诊断收益(CODE)研究:前瞻性队列研究和系统评价。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;57(1):43-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.22072. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
3
Incremental yield of whole-genome sequencing over chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing for congenital anomalies in prenatal period and infancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.全基因组测序相对于染色体微阵列分析和外显子组测序在产前和婴儿期先天性畸形中的增量收益:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jan;63(1):15-23. doi: 10.1002/uog.27491.
4
Diagnostic yield using whole-genome sequencing and in-silico panel of 281 genes associated with non-immune hydrops fetalis in clinical setting.在临床环境中使用全基因组测序和与非免疫性胎儿水肿相关的 281 个基因的计算机综合面板进行诊断的效果。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct;60(4):487-493. doi: 10.1002/uog.24911. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
5
Diagnostic yield of next-generation sequencing in fetuses with isolated increased nuchal translucency: systematic review and meta-analysis.孤立性颈项透明层增厚胎儿中应用下一代测序的诊断效能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;59(1):26-32. doi: 10.1002/uog.23746.
6
RASopathies are the most common set of monogenic syndromes identified by exome sequencing for nonimmune hydrops fetalis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.RAS 病是通过外显子组测序在非免疫性胎儿水肿中确定的最常见的一组单基因综合征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Med Genet A. 2024 May;194(5):e63494. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63494. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
7
Incremental yield of exome sequencing over standard prenatal testing in structurally normal fetuses: systematic review and meta-analysis.结构正常胎儿中外显子组测序相对于标准产前检测的增量收益:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May;65(5):552-559. doi: 10.1002/uog.29195. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
8
Diagnostic yield of exome sequencing in fetuses with multisystem malformations: systematic review and meta-analysis.外显子组测序在多系统畸形胎儿中的诊断效能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;59(6):715-722. doi: 10.1002/uog.24862.
9
Diagnostic yield from prenatal exome sequencing for non-immune hydrops fetalis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.胎儿非免疫性水肿的产前外显子组测序诊断率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Genet. 2023 May;103(5):503-512. doi: 10.1111/cge.14309. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
10
High diagnosis rate for nonimmune hydrops fetalis with prenatal clinical exome from the Hydrops-Yielding Diagnostic Results of Prenatal Sequencing (HYDROPS) Study.产前临床外显子组测序在非免疫性胎儿水肿中的高诊断率:来自产前测序导致胎儿水肿的诊断结果研究(HYDROPS)。
Genet Med. 2021 Jul;23(7):1325-1333. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01121-0. Epub 2021 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of international phenotypic criteria for prenatal exome sequencing: systematic review and comparative diagnostic accuracy study using historical individual participant data.产前外显子组测序国际表型标准的性能:使用历史个体参与者数据的系统评价和比较诊断准确性研究
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1002/uog.29290.
2
Genetic diseases underlying a spectrum of fetal effusions.一系列胎儿积液背后的遗传疾病。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025 May 8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2025.04.072.
3
Fetal Hydrops: Genetic Dissection of an Unspecific Sonographic Finding-A Comprehensive Review.胎儿水肿:一种非特异性超声检查结果的遗传学剖析——全面综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Feb 14;15(4):465. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15040465.
4
Hydrops fetalis due to loss of function of hNav1.4 channel via compound heterozygous variants.由于复合杂合变异导致hNav1.4通道功能丧失引起的胎儿水肿。
J Hum Genet. 2025 Jan;70(1):3-8. doi: 10.1038/s10038-024-01284-z. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
5
Monogenic conditions and central nervous system anomalies: A prospective study, systematic review and meta-analysis.单基因疾病与中枢神经系统异常:一项前瞻性研究、系统综述和荟萃分析。
Prenat Diagn. 2024 Apr;44(4):422-431. doi: 10.1002/pd.6466. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
6
Access to prenatal exome sequencing for fetal malformations: A qualitative landscape analysis in the US.美国胎儿畸形产前外显子组测序的可及性:定性景观分析。
Prenat Diagn. 2023 Oct;43(11):1394-1405. doi: 10.1002/pd.6444. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
A Pain in the Neck: Lessons Learnt from Genetic Testing in Fetuses Detected with Nuchal Fluid Collections, Increased Nuchal Translucency versus Cystic Hygroma-Systematic Review of the Literature, Meta-Analysis and Case Series.棘手难题:从对检测到有颈部积液、颈部透明带增厚或囊状水瘤的胎儿进行基因检测中吸取的教训——文献系统综述、荟萃分析及病例系列研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;13(1):48. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010048.
8
Implementation of Public Funded Genome Sequencing in Evaluation of Fetal Structural Anomalies.公共资助基因组测序在胎儿结构异常评估中的应用。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Nov 10;13(11):2088. doi: 10.3390/genes13112088.
9
Current Perspectives of Prenatal Cell-free DNA Screening in Clinical Management of First-Trimester Septated Cystic Hygroma.孕早期分隔性囊状水囊瘤临床管理中产前游离DNA筛查的现状
Int J Womens Health. 2022 Oct 25;14:1499-1518. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S328201. eCollection 2022.
10
Next Generation Sequencing after Invasive Prenatal Testing in Fetuses with Congenital Malformations: Prenatal or Neonatal Investigation.先天性畸形胎儿有创性产前检测后的下一代测序:产前或新生儿调查。
Genes (Basel). 2022 Aug 24;13(9):1517. doi: 10.3390/genes13091517.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence to Support the Clinical Utility of Prenatal Exome Sequencing in Evaluation of the Fetus with Congenital Anomalies: Scientific Impact Paper No. 64 [February] 2021.支持在胎儿先天性畸形评估中应用产前外显子组测序的临床实用性的证据:科学影响文件第 64 号[2 月]2021 年。
BJOG. 2021 Aug;128(9):e39-e50. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16616. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
The Human Phenotype Ontology in 2021.2021 年人类表型本体论。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 Jan 8;49(D1):D1207-D1217. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1043.
3
A systematic review of monogenic etiologies of nonimmune hydrops fetalis.非免疫性胎儿水肿的单基因病因学系统评价。
Genet Med. 2021 Jan;23(1):3-12. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-00967-0. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Exome Sequencing for Prenatal Diagnosis in Nonimmune Hydrops Fetalis.外显子组测序在非免疫性胎儿水肿产前诊断中的应用。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 29;383(18):1746-1756. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2023643. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
Exome sequencing improves genetic diagnosis of fetal increased nuchal translucency.外显子组测序提高了胎儿颈项透明层增厚的遗传学诊断。
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Oct;40(11):1426-1431. doi: 10.1002/pd.5789. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
6
A prospective study on rapid exome sequencing as a diagnostic test for multiple congenital anomalies on fetal ultrasound.前瞻性研究快速外显子组测序作为胎儿超声多种先天性畸形的诊断检测方法。
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Sep;40(10):1300-1309. doi: 10.1002/pd.5781. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
7
COngenital heart disease and the Diagnostic yield with Exome sequencing (CODE) study: prospective cohort study and systematic review.先天性心脏病与外显子组测序的诊断收益(CODE)研究:前瞻性队列研究和系统评价。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;57(1):43-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.22072. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
8
Rapid whole exome sequencing in pregnancies to identify the underlying genetic cause in fetuses with congenital anomalies detected by ultrasound imaging.超声影像学检查发现胎儿存在先天畸形时,进行快速全外显子组测序以鉴定潜在的遗传病因。
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Jul;40(8):972-983. doi: 10.1002/pd.5717. Epub 2020 May 5.
9
Implementation of exome sequencing in fetal diagnostics-Data and experiences from a tertiary center in Denmark.对胎儿诊断进行外显子组测序的实施——丹麦一家三级中心的数据和经验。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):783-790. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13871.
10
Nonimmune hydrops fetalis: Genetic analysis and clinical outcome.非免疫性胎儿水肿:遗传学分析与临床结局。
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Jun;40(7):803-812. doi: 10.1002/pd.5691. Epub 2020 May 3.

胎儿水肿与下一代测序对标准产前诊断检测(FIND)的增量收益(FIND)研究:前瞻性队列研究和荟萃分析。

Fetal hydrops and the Incremental yield of Next-generation sequencing over standard prenatal Diagnostic testing (FIND) study: prospective cohort study and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.

Fetal Medicine Centre, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Oct;58(4):509-518. doi: 10.1002/uog.23652.

DOI:10.1002/uog.23652
PMID:33847422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8487902/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incremental yield of exome sequencing (ES) over chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) or karyotyping in prenatally diagnosed non-immune hydrops fetalis (NIHF).

METHODS

A prospective cohort study (comprising an extended group of the Prenatal Assessment of Genomes and Exomes (PAGE) study) was performed which included 28 cases of prenatally diagnosed NIHF undergoing trio ES following negative CMA or karyotyping. These cases were combined with data from a systematic review of the literature. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched electronically (January 2000 to October 2020) for studies reporting on the incremental yield of ES over CMA or karyotyping in fetuses with prenatally detected NIHF. Inclusion criteria for the systematic review were: (i) at least two cases of NIHF undergoing sequencing; (ii) testing initiated based on prenatal ultrasound-based phenotype; and (iii) negative CMA or karyotyping result. The incremental diagnostic yield of ES was assessed in: (i) all cases of NIHF; (ii) isolated NIHF; (iii) NIHF associated with an additional fetal structural anomaly; and (iv) NIHF according to severity (i.e. two vs three or more cavities affected).

RESULTS

In the extended PAGE study cohort, the additional diagnostic yield of ES over CMA or karyotyping was 25.0% (7/28) in all NIHF cases, 21.4% (3/14) in those with isolated NIHF and 28.6% (4/14) in those with non-isolated NIHF. In the meta-analysis, the pooled incremental yield based on 21 studies (306 cases) was 29% (95% CI, 24-34%; P < 0.00001; I  = 0%) in all NIHF, 21% (95% CI, 13-30%; P < 0.00001; I  = 0%) in isolated NIHF and 39% (95% CI, 30-49%; P < 0.00001; I  = 1%) in NIHF associated with an additional fetal structural anomaly. In the latter group, congenital limb contractures were the most prevalent additional structural anomaly associated with a causative pathogenic variant, occurring in 17.3% (19/110) of cases. The incremental yield did not differ significantly according to hydrops severity. The most common genetic disorders identified were RASopathies, occurring in 30.3% (27/89) of cases with a causative pathogenic variant, most frequently due to a PTPN11 variant (44.4%; 12/27). The predominant inheritance pattern in causative pathogenic variants was autosomal dominant in monoallelic disease genes (57.3%; 51/89), with most being de novo (86.3%; 44/51).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of prenatal next-generation sequencing in both isolated and non-isolated NIHF should be considered in the development of clinical pathways. Given the wide range of potential syndromic diagnoses and heterogeneity in the prenatal phenotype of NIHF, exome or whole-genome sequencing may prove to be a more appropriate testing approach than a targeted gene panel testing strategy. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

摘要

目的

确定外显子组测序(ES)相对于染色体微阵列分析(CMA)或核型分析在产前诊断非免疫性胎儿水肿(NIHF)中的增量收益。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性队列研究(包括产前基因组和外显子组评估(PAGE)研究的扩展组),其中包括 28 例经阴性 CMA 或核型分析后进行三体外显子组 ES 检测的产前诊断 NIHF 病例。这些病例与文献系统评价中的数据相结合。电子检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库(2000 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月),以获取关于产前检测到 NIHF 的胎儿中 ES 相对于 CMA 或核型分析的增量收益的研究报告。系统评价的纳入标准为:(i)至少有 2 例 NIHF 进行测序;(ii)根据产前超声表型启动检测;(iii)CMA 或核型结果为阴性。评估 ES 的增量诊断收益的标准为:(i)所有 NIHF 病例;(ii)孤立性 NIHF;(iii)与额外胎儿结构异常相关的 NIHF;以及(iv)根据严重程度的 NIHF(即,受影响的腔隙为 2 个 vs 3 个或更多)。

结果

在扩展的 PAGE 研究队列中,ES 相对于 CMA 或核型分析的额外诊断收益在所有 NIHF 病例中为 25.0%(28 例中的 7 例),在孤立性 NIHF 中为 21.4%(14 例中的 3 例),在非孤立性 NIHF 中为 28.6%(14 例中的 4 例)。在荟萃分析中,基于 21 项研究(306 例)的汇总增量收益为 29%(95%CI,24-34%;P<0.00001;I=0%),在所有 NIHF 中为 21%(95%CI,13-30%;P<0.00001;I=0%),在孤立性 NIHF 中为 39%(95%CI,30-49%;P<0.00001;I=1%),在与额外胎儿结构异常相关的 NIHF 中为 39%。在后一组中,先天性肢体挛缩是最常见的与致病变异相关的额外结构异常,在 110 例有致病变异的病例中发生了 17.3%(19/110)。根据水肿严重程度,增量收益没有显著差异。最常见的确定遗传疾病是 RAS 相关疾病,在 89 例有致病变异的病例中发生率为 30.3%(27/89),最常见的是由于 PTPN11 变异(44.4%;12/27)。致病变异的主要遗传模式为常染色体显性遗传,在单等位基因疾病基因中为 57.3%(89 例中的 51 例),大多数为新生(86.3%;44/51)。

结论

在制定临床路径时,应考虑在孤立性和非孤立性 NIHF 中使用产前下一代测序。鉴于 NIHF 的潜在综合征诊断范围广泛,且产前表型存在异质性,外显子组或全基因组测序可能比靶向基因panel 检测策略更适合作为检测方法。© 2021 作者。约翰威立父子出版公司出版的《超声妇产科杂志》由国际妇产科超声学会代表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edf/8487902/b2a6402159fe/nihms-1695948-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edf/8487902/75afe42a57d7/nihms-1695948-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edf/8487902/3a66e0f8b7bf/nihms-1695948-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edf/8487902/b2a6402159fe/nihms-1695948-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edf/8487902/75afe42a57d7/nihms-1695948-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edf/8487902/3a66e0f8b7bf/nihms-1695948-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9edf/8487902/b2a6402159fe/nihms-1695948-f0003.jpg