Humphries Christopher, Walker Alison
Emergency Department, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Emergency Department, Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust, UK; West Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2023 Jan;93:102465. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2022.102465. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD) is a presentation of behavioural change which may conceal life-threatening illness. Concerns have been raised that it is used as a justification for deaths in custody and within the health and care system, but there is a lack of evidence exploring how the term ABD is applied in the UK.
to establish how UK police officers apply force in ABD compared to other presentations, examine outcome and fatality data, and identify regional variation and potential systemic issues in the application of the term ABD in a UK setting.
retrospective cohort study of 562,280 police use of force (UoF) reports (England and Wales, Apr 2020-Mar 2021).
differences were identified in UoF location, co-existing contributors to UoF, justifications given, patient demographics, methods of restraint, and outcomes. Differences were also identified in UoF reports per capita and identification of ABD between police forces.
while there are limitations to the data set and the paper is hypothesis-generating only, this study found evidence suggestive of variations in reporting practices between police forces, and evidence that identification of ABD appears to be associated with protective aims of UoF and more likely to result in a healthcare-focussed outcome. While the majority of ABD was identified in people perceived to be white men, some demographic criteria were associated with an increased relative risk that ABD was identified as a reason for UoF.
急性行为障碍(ABD)是一种行为变化表现,可能掩盖危及生命的疾病。有人担心它被用作拘留期间以及医疗和护理系统内死亡的正当理由,但缺乏证据探讨“ABD”一词在英国是如何应用的。
确定与其他情况相比,英国警察在处理ABD时如何使用武力,检查结果和死亡数据,并确定在英国背景下应用“ABD”一词时的地区差异和潜在的系统性问题。
对562,280份警察使用武力(UoF)报告进行回顾性队列研究(英格兰和威尔士,2020年4月至2021年3月)。
在使用武力的地点、使用武力的并存因素、给出的理由、患者人口统计学、约束方法和结果方面发现了差异。在人均使用武力报告以及警察部队之间对ABD的认定方面也发现了差异。
虽然数据集存在局限性,且本文仅用于提出假设,但本研究发现有证据表明警察部队之间的报告做法存在差异,并且有证据表明,认定ABD似乎与使用武力的保护目的相关,并且更有可能产生以医疗保健为重点的结果。虽然大多数ABD病例出现在被认为是白人男性的人群中,但一些人口统计学标准与将ABD认定为使用武力原因的相对风险增加有关。