J. B. Snow Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
JAMA. 2022 Dec 13;328(22):2242-2251. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21893.
Some weight loss and exercise programs that have been successful in academic center-based trials have not been evaluated in community settings.
To determine whether adaptation of a diet and exercise intervention to community settings resulted in a statistically significant reduction in pain, compared with an attention control group, at 18-month follow-up.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Assessor-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted in community settings in urban and rural counties in North Carolina. Patients were men and women aged 50 years or older with knee osteoarthritis and overweight or obesity (body mass index ≥27). Enrollment (N = 823) occurred between May 2016 and August 2019, with follow-up ending in April 2021.
Patients were randomly assigned to either a diet and exercise intervention (n = 414) or an attention control (n = 409) group for 18 months.
The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) knee pain score (range, 0 [none] to 20 [severe]; minimum clinically important difference, 1.6) over 18 months, tested using a repeated-measures mixed linear model with adjustments for covariates. There were 7 secondary outcomes including body weight.
Among the 823 randomized patients (mean age, 64.6 years; 637 [77%] women), 658 (80%) completed the trial. At 18-month follow-up, the adjusted mean WOMAC pain score was 5.0 in the diet and exercise group (n = 329) compared with 5.5 in the attention control group (n = 316) (adjusted difference, -0.6; 95% CI, -1.0 to -0.1; P = .02). Of 7 secondary outcomes, 5 were significantly better in the intervention group compared with control. The mean change in unadjusted 18-month body weight for patients with available data was -7.7 kg (8%) in the diet and exercise group (n = 289) and -1.7 kg (2%) in the attention control group (n = 273) (mean difference, -6.0 kg; 95% CI, -7.3 kg to -4.7 kg). There were 169 serious adverse events; none were definitely related to the study. There were 729 adverse events; 32 (4%) were definitely related to the study, including 10 body injuries (9 in diet and exercise; 1 in attention control), 7 muscle strains (6 in diet and exercise; 1 in attention control), and 6 trip/fall events (all 6 in diet and exercise).
Among patients with knee osteoarthritis and overweight or obesity, diet and exercise compared with an attention control led to a statistically significant but small difference in knee pain over 18 months. The magnitude of the difference in pain between groups is of uncertain clinical importance.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02577549.
一些在学术中心试验中成功的减肥和运动项目尚未在社区环境中进行评估。
确定在社区环境中对饮食和运动干预进行调整是否会导致疼痛在 18 个月随访时与对照组相比具有统计学意义的降低。
设计、地点和参与者:在北卡罗来纳州城乡县的社区环境中进行的评估员盲法随机临床试验。患者为年龄在 50 岁及以上、患有膝骨关节炎且超重或肥胖(体重指数≥27)的男性和女性。招募(N=823)于 2016 年 5 月至 2019 年 8 月进行,随访于 2021 年 4 月结束。
患者被随机分配到饮食和运动干预组(n=414)或对照组(n=409),进行 18 个月的干预。
主要结果是在 18 个月时使用重复测量混合线性模型,调整协变量后,Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)膝关节疼痛评分(范围,0[无]至 20[严重];最小临床重要差异,1.6)在饮食和运动组(n=329)与对照组(n=316)之间的差异,次要结果包括体重。
在 823 名随机患者中(平均年龄 64.6 岁;637[77%]名女性),658 名(80%)完成了试验。在 18 个月的随访中,饮食和运动组的 WOMAC 疼痛评分平均为 5.0(n=329),对照组为 5.5(n=316)(调整差异,-0.6;95%CI,-1.0 至-0.1;P=0.02)。在 7 项次要结果中,有 5 项在干预组与对照组相比有显著改善。有可用数据的患者在未经调整的 18 个月体重变化平均为饮食和运动组 -7.7kg(8%)(n=289),对照组 -1.7kg(2%)(n=273)(平均差异,-6.0kg;95%CI,-7.3kg 至-4.7kg)。共有 169 例严重不良事件;无明确与研究相关。共有 729 例不良事件;32 例(4%)与研究肯定相关,包括 10 例身体损伤(9 例在饮食和运动组,1 例在对照组),7 例肌肉拉伤(6 例在饮食和运动组,1 例在对照组),和 6 起跌倒事件(均在饮食和运动组)。
在患有膝骨关节炎和超重或肥胖的患者中,与对照组相比,饮食和运动在 18 个月内导致膝关节疼痛具有统计学意义但较小的差异。组间疼痛差异的幅度在临床重要性上存在不确定性。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02577549。