Suppr超能文献

试验方案中报告结果的指南:SPIRIT-结果2022扩展版

Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 Extension.

作者信息

Butcher Nancy J, Monsour Andrea, Mew Emma J, Chan An-Wen, Moher David, Mayo-Wilson Evan, Terwee Caroline B, Chee-A-Tow Alyssandra, Baba Ami, Gavin Frank, Grimshaw Jeremy M, Kelly Lauren E, Saeed Leena, Thabane Lehana, Askie Lisa, Smith Maureen, Farid-Kapadia Mufiza, Williamson Paula R, Szatmari Peter, Tugwell Peter, Golub Robert M, Monga Suneeta, Vohra Sunita, Marlin Susan, Ungar Wendy J, Offringa Martin

机构信息

Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA. 2022 Dec 20;328(23):2345-2356. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21243.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Complete information in a trial protocol regarding study outcomes is crucial for obtaining regulatory approvals, ensuring standardized trial conduct, reducing research waste, and providing transparency of methods to facilitate trial replication, critical appraisal, accurate reporting and interpretation of trial results, and knowledge synthesis. However, recommendations on what outcome-specific information should be included are diverse and inconsistent. To improve reporting practices promoting transparent and reproducible outcome selection, assessment, and analysis, a need for specific and harmonized guidance as to what outcome-specific information should be addressed in clinical trial protocols exists.

OBJECTIVE

To develop harmonized, evidence- and consensus-based standards for describing outcomes in clinical trial protocols through integration with the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 statement.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Using the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) methodological framework, the SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 extension of the SPIRIT 2013 statement was developed by (1) generation and evaluation of candidate outcome reporting items via consultation with experts and a scoping review of existing guidance for reporting trial outcomes (published within the 10 years prior to March 19, 2018) identified through expert solicitation, electronic database searches of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Methodology Register, gray literature searches, and reference list searches; (2) a 3-round international Delphi voting process (November 2018-February 2019) completed by 124 panelists from 22 countries to rate and identify additional items; and (3) an in-person consensus meeting (April 9-10, 2019) attended by 25 panelists to identify essential items for outcome-specific reporting to be addressed in clinical trial protocols.

FINDINGS

The scoping review and consultation with experts identified 108 recommendations relevant to outcome-specific reporting to be addressed in trial protocols, the majority (72%) of which were not included in the SPIRIT 2013 statement. All recommendations were consolidated into 56 items for Delphi voting; after the Delphi survey process, 19 items met criteria for further evaluation at the consensus meeting and possible inclusion in the SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 extension. The discussions during and after the consensus meeting yielded 9 items that elaborate on the SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist items and are related to completely defining and justifying the choice of primary, secondary, and other outcomes (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 12) prospectively in the trial protocol, defining and justifying the target difference between treatment groups for the primary outcome used in the sample size calculations (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 14), describing the responsiveness of the study instruments used to assess the outcome and providing details on the outcome assessors (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 18a), and describing any planned methods to account for multiplicity relating to the analyses or interpretation of the results (SPIRIT 2013 statement checklist item 20a).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 extension of the SPIRIT 2013 statement provides 9 outcome-specific items that should be addressed in all trial protocols and may help increase trial utility, replicability, and transparency and may minimize the risk of selective nonreporting of trial results.

摘要

重要性

试验方案中有关研究结果的完整信息对于获得监管批准、确保试验规范开展、减少研究浪费以及提供方法透明度以促进试验复制、批判性评价、准确报告和解释试验结果以及知识整合至关重要。然而,关于应包含哪些特定结果信息的建议多种多样且不一致。为了改进报告实践,促进透明且可重复的结果选择、评估和分析,需要针对临床试验方案中应涵盖哪些特定结果信息提供具体且统一的指导。

目的

通过与《标准方案条目:干预性试验建议》(SPIRIT)2013声明相结合,制定基于证据和共识的临床试验方案结果描述统一标准。

证据审查

采用提高卫生研究质量和透明度(EQUATOR)方法框架,通过以下方式制定了SPIRIT 2013声明的SPIRIT-结果2022扩展版:(1)通过与专家协商以及对通过专家征集、对MEDLINE和Cochrane方法学注册库进行电子数据库检索、灰色文献检索和参考文献列表检索所确定的现有试验结果报告指南(2018年3月19日之前10年内发表)进行范围审查,生成并评估候选结果报告条目;(2)由来自22个国家的124名小组成员完成三轮国际德尔菲投票过程(2018年11月至?2019年2月),以对条目进行评分并确定其他条目;(3)25名小组成员参加的面对面共识会议(2019年4月9 - 10日),以确定临床试验方案中应涉及的特定结果报告的基本条目。

研究结果

范围审查和与专家的协商确定了108条与试验方案中特定结果报告相关的建议,其中大多数(72%)未包含在SPIRIT 2013声明中。所有建议被整合为56个条目进行德尔菲投票;在德尔菲调查过程之后,19个条目符合在共识会议上进一步评估并可能纳入SPIRIT-结果2022扩展版的标准。共识会议期间及之后的讨论产生了9个条目,这些条目详细阐述了SPIRIT 2013声明清单条目,并且与在试验方案中前瞻性地完全定义和证明主要、次要及其他结果的选择(SPIRIT 2013声明清单条目12)、定义并证明样本量计算中使用的主要结果的治疗组之间的目标差异(SPIRIT 2013声明清单条目14)、描述用于评估结果的研究工具的反应性并提供结果评估者的详细信息(SPIRIT 2013声明清单条目18a)以及描述任何计划用于处理与结果分析或解释相关的多重性的方法(SPIRIT 2013声明清单条目20a)有关。

结论与意义

SPIRIT 2013声明的此SPIRIT-结果2022扩展版提供了9个特定结果条目,所有试验方案均应涉及,这可能有助于提高试验效用、可重复性和透明度,并可能将试验结果选择性不报告的风险降至最低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验