Lorente-Rovira Esther, Grasa Eva, Ochoa Susana, Corripio Iluminada, Peláez Trinidad, López-Carrilero Raquel, Gutiérrez-Gea Ángela, Morano-Guillén María, Villagrán José M, Bartels-Velthuis Agna A, Jenner Jack A, Sanjuán Julio
Hospital Clínico, Valencia, Spain; INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain; CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain.
CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain; Department of Psychiatry, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB-SANT PAU, Hospital Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Spain.
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed). 2022 Oct-Dec;15(4):259-271. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsmen.2020.03.002.
An updated summary of the most used instruments assessing auditory hallucinations in population with psychosis, allows us to underline the scarceness and need of Spanish versions of important instruments. The aim of the study is to examine the psychometric characteristics of two different and complementary instruments for assessing auditory hallucinations, the Spanish version of the Auditory Vocal Hallucination Scale (AVHRS) and the Spanish version of the Positive and Useful Voices Inquiry (PUVI).
A sample of 68 patients from four different centres, with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder presenting with auditory hallucinations were included. Apart from the AVHRS and the PUVI, the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales-Auditory Hallucinations subscale (PSYRATS-AH) and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were also administered to all patients, plus an acceptability questionnaire.
The Spanish version of the AVHRS showed a good internal consistency, a moderate to high inter-rater reliability, a medium to moderate test-retest reliability, and a good convergent and discriminant validity. The Spanish version of the PUVI showed a good internal consistency and a heterogeneous, but in general moderate, test-retest reliability.
The Spanish versions of the AVHRS and the PUVI have good psychometric properties and are well accepted among patients.
对评估精神病患者幻听的最常用工具进行的最新总结,使我们能够强调重要工具的西班牙语版本的稀缺性和需求。本研究的目的是检验两种不同且互补的评估幻听工具的心理测量特征,即西班牙语版的幻听量表(AVHRS)和西班牙语版的积极有益声音问卷(PUVI)。
纳入了来自四个不同中心的68名患者,这些患者根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)被诊断为患有精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍且伴有幻听。除了AVHRS和PUVI外,还对所有患者进行了精神病症状评定量表 - 幻听分量表(PSYRATS - AH)和阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)的评估,以及一份可接受性问卷。
西班牙语版的AVHRS显示出良好的内部一致性、中等至高的评分者间信度、中等至中等的重测信度以及良好的收敛效度和区分效度。西班牙语版的PUVI显示出良好的内部一致性以及异质性但总体中等的重测信度。
西班牙语版的AVHRS和PUVI具有良好的心理测量特性,并且在患者中得到了很好的接受。