Marley Sarah A, Siani Alessandro, Sims Stuart
Scotland's Rural College (SRUC) Aberdeen UK.
School of Biological Sciences University of Portsmouth Portsmouth UK.
Ecol Evol. 2022 Dec 8;12(12):e9593. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9593. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Student engagement can have a positive influence on student success. Many methods exist for fostering engagement but tend to be generic and require tailoring to specific contexts, subjects, and students. In the case of undergraduate science students, practical classes are a popular tool for increasing engagement. However, despite strong potential for improvement via links with "real life" research projects (RLRPs), few academic staff incorporate research participation with teaching activities. This is potentially due to poor time availability and low opinions of students' ability to collect reliable data. This study aims to examine whether involvement with RLRPs can generate reliable scientific data and also act as a motivational tool for engaging tertiary science students. A preexisting core activity for first-year biology and marine biology students was modified to include a short RLRP component. Student-based data collection and a questionnaire about experiences were used to examine the reliability of student-collected data and student perceptions of RLRPs. Results indicated that error rate in student-collected data was minimal. Irrespective of participating in a "normal" practical class or a class with a RLRP component, students collected equally accurate data. However, when the topic aligned specifically with their degree subject, student accuracy was higher. All students surveyed reported high motivation with the idea of RLRP participation, placing high importance on this from an educational and employability perspective. Yet, students were not confident about participating in RLRPs until they had engaged with one, suggesting that introducing such projects into taught sessions early-on may encourage students to seek further opportunities in the future. In conclusion, incorporating RLRPs into the curriculum of undergraduate science courses has considerable potential benefits for both students and academic staff.
学生参与度对学生的学业成功具有积极影响。促进学生参与的方法有很多,但往往较为通用,需要根据具体情境、学科和学生进行调整。对于本科理科学生而言,实践课程是提高参与度的常用工具。然而,尽管通过与“现实生活”研究项目(RLRPs)建立联系有很大的改进潜力,但很少有学术人员将研究参与纳入教学活动。这可能是由于时间有限以及对学生收集可靠数据能力的评价较低。本研究旨在探讨参与RLRPs是否能产生可靠的科学数据,以及是否能作为一种激励工具来吸引高等理科学生。对一年级生物学和海洋生物学学生预先存在的核心活动进行了修改,纳入了一个简短的RLRP部分。采用基于学生的数据收集和一份关于经历的问卷来检验学生收集数据的可靠性以及学生对RLRPs的看法。结果表明,学生收集数据的错误率极低。无论参加“常规”实践课程还是包含RLRP部分的课程,学生收集的数据准确性相同。然而,当主题与他们的学位科目具体相关时,学生的准确性更高。所有接受调查的学生都表示对参与RLRPs的想法积极性很高,从教育和就业能力的角度来看,他们非常重视这一点。然而,学生在参与RLRPs之前对参与此类项目并不自信,这表明在早期教学环节中引入此类项目可能会鼓励学生在未来寻求更多机会。总之,将RLRPs纳入本科理科课程对学生和学术人员都有相当大的潜在益处。