Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
University of Saskatchewan, College of Medicine, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Crit Care Med. 2023 Jan 1;51(1):127-135. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005720. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
To evaluate the impact of direct discharge home (DDH) from ICUs compared with ward transfer on safety outcomes of readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and mortality.
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from inception until March 28, 2022.
Randomized and nonrandomized studies of DDH patients compared with ward transfer were eligible.
We screened and extracted studies independently and in duplicate. We assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. A random-effects meta-analysis model and heterogeneity assessment was performed using pooled data (inverse variance) for propensity-matched and unadjusted cohorts. We assessed the overall certainty of evidence for each outcome using the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.
Of 10,228 citations identified, we included six studies. Of these, three high-quality studies, which enrolled 49,376 patients in propensity-matched cohorts, could be pooled using meta-analysis. For DDH from ICU, compared with ward transfers, there was no difference in the risk of ED visits at 30-day (22.4% vs 22.7%; relative risk [RR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.95-1.02; p = 0.39; low certainty); hospital readmissions at 30-day (9.8% vs 9.6%; RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.91-1.15; p = 0.71; very low-to-low certainty); or 90-day mortality (2.8% vs 2.6%; RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.95-1.18; p = 0.29; very low-to-low certainty). There were no important differences in the unmatched cohorts or across subgroup analyses.
Very low-to-low certainty evidence from observational studies suggests that DDH from ICU may have no difference in safety outcomes compared with ward transfer of selected ICU patients. In the future, this research question could be further examined by randomized control trials to provide higher certainty data.
评估 ICU 直接出院(DDH)与病房转科相比对再入院、急诊就诊和死亡率的安全结局的影响。
我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库和 Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature,检索时间截至 2022 年 3 月 28 日。
符合条件的研究为 DDH 患者与病房转科的随机和非随机研究。
我们独立地对研究进行筛选和提取,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(Newcastle-Ottawa Scale)评估观察性研究的偏倚风险。使用倾向匹配和未调整队列的汇总数据(逆方差)进行随机效应荟萃分析模型和异质性评估。我们使用推荐评估、制定与评价(Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation)方法评估每个结局的证据总体确定性。
在 10228 条引文识别中,我们纳入了 6 项研究。其中,3 项高质量研究,纳入了 49376 名患者的倾向匹配队列,可以进行荟萃分析。对于 ICU 的 DDH,与病房转科相比,30 天内急诊就诊的风险无差异(22.4%比 22.7%;相对风险 [RR],0.99;95%置信区间 [CI],0.95-1.02;p=0.39;低确定性);30 天内住院再入院的风险无差异(9.8%比 9.6%;RR,1.02;95%CI,0.91-1.15;p=0.71;极低到低确定性);或 90 天死亡率无差异(2.8%比 2.6%;RR,1.06;95%CI,0.95-1.18;p=0.29;极低到低确定性)。未匹配队列或亚组分析中无重要差异。
来自观察性研究的极低到低确定性证据表明,与 ICU 患者的病房转科相比,ICU 的 DDH 可能在安全结局方面没有差异。未来,这一研究问题可以通过随机对照试验进一步研究,以提供更高确定性的数据。